![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
If you think of the factors that affect drag, and therefore top speed, mass doesn't come into it. Unless you are going up or down a hill of course. Well, there's a miniscule variation in bearing drag and rolling resistance due to weight, but whatever... Since aerodynamics is the biggest component of drag, I'd say the variation in riding positions between the bikes is what's causing the difference in top speeds. John Swanson www.bikephysics.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,719
|
Quote:
Why do you hate Cervelo so much? And why do you hate America? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Relevant to what? Speed? Feel? Look? As I said, using that 36% weight reduction as a parameter is probably a worst case scenario. If the OP can't feel a difference, then he won't feel the difference b/n 25lb to 16lb. If he does, then he can go and test ride a physical 16lb bike. In any case, it's a close to zero cost experiment.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 453
|
Saving a good chunk of weight (off bike or rider) can make a noticable difference off climbing performance. I'd like to climb 5% faster.
So the theory that has been driven into cyclists is that even a small difference in weight will make a small difference. You might not notice each small difference but they add up. And thats where our ego and marketing kicks in. Racing or otherwise we want to be able to keep up or push ahead, and every advantage is desired. The marketing departments are always telling you people win on thier products, your competitors/mates have this advantage, you need it too. Plus there is prestige to owning a "quality" bike, jut like owning a "quality" car. For me personally, I'd looooove a high end bike that weights 7.5kg and looks pretty. But the extra it costs to go from mid range solid dependable and resonable looking to high end flashy light weight does not result in enough performance increase for my type of riding. Beides a $10,000 bike crashes just the same as a $3000 bike, maybe even worse! For some people what they percieve in gain is worth the extra money TO THEM, so let them spend it. The rest of us get the trickle down effect of the developement that goes into these over priced items.
__________________
******BLATANT ADVERTISING ALERT****** I have ceramic bearings for: Campy/Fulcrum high end hubs/wheels Shimano hubs and pedals check out my ebay items here |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
|
PhillP: I hear you. But it stands in stark contrast to the ceramic bearing you are selling in your signature line.
![]()
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,572
|
Let's see what has been mentioned already bike weight, rider weight, terrain, aerodynamics.
Anyone mention wattage output to weight/drag ratio?
__________________
Sobriety is over rated! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 857
|
Quote:
I think he should find out for himself but there is SO much more involved and different when considering a bike that weighs this or that and also when comparing to his 25 pound Schwinn. Lots more than just weight but that's all bike makers can measure and point to so less weight becomes better when all it really is lighter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 61
|
Tell you what though, some nice skinny tyres make a whole lot of difference. Coming from my hybrid on 40mm to my roadie on 25mm is like floating down the road.
The main reason low weight is an advantage is that its easier to carry it home when you stick it in a pothole and bend the front wheel (thats my experience anyway )
__________________
Its not what you've got its what you do with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 857
|
Quote:
Doooohhh!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,183
|
Quote:
Yeah, but if you had some solid heavy wheels on, maybe you wouldn't have bent it.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
The higher momentum would have collapsed the concrete barrier instead. ![]()
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
+1 for your statement ".....less weight becomes better when all it really is is lighter". Weight is easy to measure, so it gets measured and compared, while the important (and hard to achieve) parameters of strength and durability tend to be ignored in buy decisions. After all, weight can be shaved off any part of the bike at little or no cost to the manufacturer. Just make the part thinner and bingo, less weight = more sales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|