Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-02.-2008, 11:49 AM   #16
ScienceIsCool
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 326
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
I have a feeling this one will get shot down.
KERBLAM! There ya go...

If you think of the factors that affect drag, and therefore top speed, mass doesn't come into it. Unless you are going up or down a hill of course. Well, there's a miniscule variation in bearing drag and rolling resistance due to weight, but whatever...

Since aerodynamics is the biggest component of drag, I'd say the variation in riding positions between the bikes is what's causing the difference in top speeds.

John Swanson
www.bikephysics.com
ScienceIsCool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 12:19 PM   #17
alienator
Registered User
 
alienator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,719
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScienceIsCool
KERBLAM! There ya go...

If you think of the factors that affect drag, and therefore top speed, mass doesn't come into it. Unless you are going up or down a hill of course. Well, there's a miniscule variation in bearing drag and rolling resistance due to weight, but whatever...

Since aerodynamics is the biggest component of drag, I'd say the variation in riding positions between the bikes is what's causing the difference in top speeds.

John Swanson
www.bikephysics.com


Why do you hate Cervelo so much? And why do you hate America?
alienator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 02:07 PM   #18
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
Doesn't matter. The issue is whether a rider can feel a 36% reduction in the bike's weight. He'll just have to try it.

As for the math. 39lb (25+14) to 25lb is a 36% weight reduction, comparable to 25lb to 16lb. Of course, he can also try a 9lb variation (25lb to 16lb), but that's by absolute weight difference rather than by percentage.
With due respect... the percentage weight reduction of the stand alone bike is irrelevant. It is the nine pounds difference that is relevant.
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 03:53 PM   #19
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
With due respect... the percentage weight reduction of the stand alone bike is irrelevant. It is the nine pounds difference that is relevant.

Relevant to what? Speed? Feel? Look?

As I said, using that 36% weight reduction as a parameter is probably a worst case scenario. If the OP can't feel a difference, then he won't feel the difference b/n 25lb to 16lb. If he does, then he can go and test ride a physical 16lb bike. In any case, it's a close to zero cost experiment.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 08:44 PM   #20
Phill P
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 453
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Saving a good chunk of weight (off bike or rider) can make a noticable difference off climbing performance. I'd like to climb 5% faster.
So the theory that has been driven into cyclists is that even a small difference in weight will make a small difference. You might not notice each small difference but they add up.

And thats where our ego and marketing kicks in. Racing or otherwise we want to be able to keep up or push ahead, and every advantage is desired.
The marketing departments are always telling you people win on thier products, your competitors/mates have this advantage, you need it too.
Plus there is prestige to owning a "quality" bike, jut like owning a "quality" car.

For me personally, I'd looooove a high end bike that weights 7.5kg and looks pretty. But the extra it costs to go from mid range solid dependable and resonable looking to high end flashy light weight does not result in enough performance increase for my type of riding. Beides a $10,000 bike crashes just the same as a $3000 bike, maybe even worse!
For some people what they percieve in gain is worth the extra money TO THEM, so let them spend it. The rest of us get the trickle down effect of the developement that goes into these over priced items.
__________________
******BLATANT ADVERTISING ALERT******
I have ceramic bearings for:
Campy/Fulcrum high end hubs/wheels
Shimano hubs and pedals
check out my ebay items here
Phill P is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 08:53 PM   #21
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

PhillP: I hear you. But it stands in stark contrast to the ceramic bearing you are selling in your signature line.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 10:44 PM   #22
jhuskey
Registered User
 
jhuskey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,572
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Let's see what has been mentioned already bike weight, rider weight, terrain, aerodynamics.
Anyone mention wattage output to weight/drag ratio?
__________________
Sobriety is over rated!
jhuskey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2008, 11:18 PM   #23
Peter@vecchios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 857
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
The OP needs to convince himself. So a simple experiment on his turf would allow him to "get to the bottom of it". So why not? All these physics probably doesn't mean very much for the OP.


I think he should find out for himself but there is SO much more involved and different when considering a bike that weighs this or that and also when comparing to his 25 pound Schwinn. Lots more than just weight but that's all bike makers can measure and point to so less weight becomes better when all it really is lighter.
Peter@vecchios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 05:21 AM   #24
Camilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTE83
This is a bit unscientific because I was in different form for these top speeds, and I don't remember the exact weight of my bikes.

Top Speed in the flats no wind sprint & weight of bike -
2004 Cervelo Soloist Team 32.9 mph 17.4 lbs
2005 Kestrel Talon 31.1 mph 18.6 ? lbs
2002 Giant TCR Aero 2 30.2 mph 18.6 lbs
2005 Giant OCR 1 with 2 Jandd Commuter Panniers 29.8 mph 29? lbs

Haven't tried top speed on my best bike - 2006 CF Cervelo Soloist Team with Zipp 404s and Zero Gravitys!
A "bit" unscientific? Totally irrelevant info, I'd say.
Camilo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 07:42 AM   #25
AngryPenguin
Registered User
 
AngryPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 61
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Tell you what though, some nice skinny tyres make a whole lot of difference. Coming from my hybrid on 40mm to my roadie on 25mm is like floating down the road.

The main reason low weight is an advantage is that its easier to carry it home when you stick it in a pothole and bend the front wheel (thats my experience anyway )
__________________
Its not what you've got its what you do with it.
AngryPenguin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 08:01 AM   #26
Peter@vecchios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 857
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
PhillP: I hear you. But it stands in stark contrast to the ceramic bearing you are selling in your signature line.



Doooohhh!!!
Peter@vecchios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 09:26 AM   #27
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,183
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPenguin
The main reason low weight is an advantage is that its easier to carry it home when you stick it in a pothole and bend the front wheel (thats my experience anyway )

Yeah, but if you had some solid heavy wheels on, maybe you wouldn't have bent it.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 09:59 AM   #28
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artemidorus
Yeah, but if you had some solid heavy wheels on, maybe you wouldn't have bent it.

The higher momentum would have collapsed the concrete barrier instead.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 10:10 AM   #29
dhk2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios
I think he should find out for himself but there is SO much more involved and different when considering a bike that weighs this or that and also when comparing to his 25 pound Schwinn. Lots more than just weight but that's all bike makers can measure and point to so less weight becomes better when all it really is lighter.

+1 for your statement ".....less weight becomes better when all it really is is lighter". Weight is easy to measure, so it gets measured and compared, while the important (and hard to achieve) parameters of strength and durability tend to be ignored in buy decisions. After all, weight can be shaved off any part of the bike at little or no cost to the manufacturer. Just make the part thinner and bingo, less weight = more sales.
dhk2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2008, 10:33 AM   #30
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhk2
+1 for your statement ".....less weight becomes better when all it really is is lighter". Weight is easy to measure, so it gets measured and compared, while the important (and hard to achieve) parameters of strength and durability tend to be ignored in buy decisions. After all, weight can be shaved off any part of the bike at little or no cost to the manufacturer. Just make the part thinner and bingo, less weight = more sales.
I don't think it is just a matter of making a part thinner. Doing just that will make that part a POS, for which nobody would pay for let alone give a premium for. They have to make it durable in addition to making it light for it to be a good sell. But yes, weight is a good marketing ploy, when for the average Joe, it is going to make an insignificant change to the speed on the bike.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet