Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-02.-2008, 02:11 PM   #46
dsschanze
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 79
Send a message via AIM to dsschanze
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

The main difference I notice between my aluminum and carbon bikes are stiffness (and of course components). When getting above 100 rpm on my alumium bike, it starts to really flexy, but my carbon bike doesn't feel flexy at all. I think the biggest advantage to weighing less is accelerations and of course climbing.
__________________
Scott CR-1 Pro
-Garmin Edge 705
-Shimano Ultegra 10

-Mavic Ksyrium Elite
-Fulcrum Racing 3

dsschanze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02.-2008, 06:19 PM   #47
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis44
What I meant to say was if I'd be able to tell the difference between a 16 a 17 lb bike.

You may, but invariably they are different frames and you won't be sure if it's the weight difference or stiffness or other ride characteristics that's playing up for you. But it is true that every bike is different, although often subtle.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02.-2008, 09:31 PM   #48
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis44
What I meant to say was if I'd be able to tell the difference between a 16 a 17 lb bike. The bike I want to get would be 18 lbs, a 7 lb drop. But thanks for all the info. You guys haven't factored in the boost from just feeling fast, that placebo effect. After riding a steel rig for my 1st 3 years cycling, a flashy new paint job, sti shifters (yes that's right i dont have them), and my wheels clicking when i pedal will be enough for me to feel stronger for some time.
Yes, but the placebo effect will not last forever. The first few times you ride your bike, sure, you may go faster because of the joy of having a new toy that seems light. But what happens after you get used to the bike? The biggest factor in your ride is the engine and the aerodynamics, and a lighter bike by itself (other factors remaining the same) is not gonna gain you that much.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 02:15 AM   #49
dhk2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
Yes, but the placebo effect will not last forever. The first few times you ride your bike, sure, you may go faster because of the joy of having a new toy that seems light. But what happens after you get used to the bike? The biggest factor in your ride is the engine and the aerodynamics, and a lighter bike by itself (other factors remaining the same) is not gonna gain you that much.

The placebo effect is known as "New Bike Syndrome" around here. The duration seems to be up to one month for every $1K spent on the new bike, particularly if they are exotic italian brands or custom frames.
dhk2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 03:37 AM   #50
AngryPenguin
Registered User
 
AngryPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 61
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhk2
The placebo effect is known as "New Bike Syndrome" around here. The duration seems to be up to one month for every $1K spent on the new bike, particularly if they are exotic italian brands or custom frames.

Thats not good, I have only got a week left, must get out quick before it becomes hard again
__________________
Its not what you've got its what you do with it.
AngryPenguin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 06:01 AM   #51
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhk2
The placebo effect is known as "New Bike Syndrome" around here. The duration seems to be up to one month for every $1K spent on the new bike, particularly if they are exotic italian brands or custom frames.

There was a heated discussion on another forum where a owner claimed that his new Cervelo is 3.4km/h (initially said 4km/h) faster than his previously well maintained road bike. So it does not have to be Italian. Canadian will do too!
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 06:22 AM   #52
Camilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
There was a heated discussion on another forum where a owner claimed that his new Cervelo is 3.4km/h (initially said 4km/h) faster than his previously well maintained road bike. So it does not have to be Italian. Canadian will do too!
This sort of thing (claimed speed gains) has always just made me chuckle. The example above is at the high end of the spectrum, but we regularly see claims of "1" or "2" mph speed increases by getting a 2 lb lighter bike and/or shedding a quarter pound on wheels. 2 mph is a huge difference and there is no way, in a controlled study (is this possible) that such small differences would do that. Might it make a difference in beating a competitor? Certainly, and if it gives you that few seconds over an hour ride that gets you on the podium, there is no doubt it is worth it (if you can afford it). But to hear a serious recreationalist claim that going from good wheels to really good wheels makes a significant, measurable difference just indicates that people really don't know the difference between good and poor data. Note I'm not saying they're changing from crappy wheels to excellent wheels; I'm talking about the normal sort of "upgrade" we all do when we can afford it: going from a 1800 gm $250 wheelset to a 1500 gm $600 wheelset.

Now, I went from a 25 lb, low grade steel bike from the 90s that didn't fit me well to a 19 lb, fairly recent Ultegra/Dura Ace grade Cannondale from a few years ago with similar change in wheels. But the new bike fits much better as well, and is so much fun to ride that I rode 10X more last summer than I had for many years. I ride 2 mph faster than the previous summer! Must be because of the weight of the bike and wheels, no!
Camilo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 06:34 AM   #53
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

I think part of it is also a mental justification to prevent buyers' remorse. After all, if a person sank a grand or whatever into new equipment, an illusion of faster speed with the new toy will also help justify that expenditure.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 06:43 AM   #54
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Within that thread, the bike in question was a Cervelo Team Soloist. So the arguments were primarily with aero benefits. Hilarious.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 07:27 AM   #55
gemship
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

whoa, harsh crowd on here. Seems like a few of you are quick to dicredit the benefits of a lighter bike. First of all it's hard to argue against the stats and science that justifies a nearly zero increase in speed given a substanstial wieght decrease, say 5 pounds give or take a couple. So I will agree there to a point. That being said I believe the benefits are a bit more than just a placebo effect. In fact it may be fair to look at the bigger picture. For most consumers when upgrading to lighter wieght there's also the upgrade of better groupo/components.I do believe the shifting does tend to get a bit more slicker at the high end for example. Not to mention the thought toward designing for added stiffness and areo.

If you really like bicycling enough to spend time on a forum or wear skin tight clothing then I believe it's perfectly okay to spend some dough on a nicer, racier ride. Perhaps it won't make you faster then again you may use less power to get up that same hill. Or you may find yourself having a easier time keeping up with your friends. Personally I'm looking forward to my new carbon Cervelo. It's going to be 7 pounds lighter than my Raliegh and an upgrade in everyway, that in it self may be the best part. Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix. I suppose folks on here can be negative as far as freedom of speech goes but I can't help to think that your all just jealous because you just too cheap, eskewed by logical reasoning to treat yourself to that so called placebo effect. To all you that think wieght doesn't matter, good luck riding whatever it is you ride and more importantly maintaining that excitement riding brings you. Fear not for if remember you on the day you decide to step up you game with a lighter bike I won't be the type of poster to rub in a double standard.
gemship is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 07:35 AM   #56
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemship
whoa, harsh crowd on here. Seems like a few of you are quick to dicredit the benefits of a lighter bike. First of all it's hard to argue against the stats and science that justifies a nearly zero increase in speed given a substanstial wieght decrease, say 5 pounds give or take a couple. So I will agree there to a point. That being said I believe the benefits are a bit more than just a placebo effect. In fact it may be fair to look at the bigger picture. For most consumers when upgrading to lighter wieght there's also the upgrade of better groupo/components.I do believe the shifting does tend to get a bit more slicker at the high end for example. Not to mention the thought toward designing for added stiffness and areo.

If you really like bicycling enough to spend time on a forum or wear skin tight clothing then I believe it's perfectly okay to spend some dough on a nicer, racier ride. Perhaps it won't make you faster then again you may use less power to get up that same hill. Or you may find yourself having a easier time keeping up with your friends. Personally I'm looking forward to my new carbon Cervelo. It's going to be 7 pounds lighter than my Raliegh and an upgrade in everyway, that in it self may be the best part. Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix. I suppose folks on here can be negative as far as freedom of speech goes but I can't help to think that your all just jealous because you just too cheap, eskewed by logical reasoning to treat yourself to that so called placebo effect. To all you that think wieght doesn't matter, good luck riding whatever it is you ride and more importantly maintaining that excitement riding brings you. Fear not for if remember you on the day you decide to step up you game with a lighter bike I won't be the type of poster to rub in a double standard.
Negative with regards to freedom of speech??? Where did you get that idea from? This forum has almost no moderation, and thus has the maximum freedom of speech.

The point here is that you are quite welcome to get a bike that you think is nice. But then, if you come here and then claim that the use of the new bike suddenly increased your speed by x km/hr just because of the reduced weight, then expect other people to call your bluff. Also, I have no idea how better shifting by itself is going to have any impact on the average speed - unless the original equipment was so bad that you spent 10-15 seconds fiddling with shifting every time you wanted to shift up or down.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 07:39 AM   #57
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemship
...Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix...

Actually, it was the engine and the team that won Paris-Roubaix.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 07:45 AM   #58
Felt_Rider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,356
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemship
I do believe the shifting does tend to get a bit more slicker at the high end for example. Not to mention the thought toward designing for added stiffness and areo.

I find that my DA components shift no better than 105 if I let them get dirty so keep your new bike clean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemship
Personally I'm looking forward to my new carbon Cervelo. It's going to be 7 pounds lighter than my Raliegh and an upgrade in everyway, that in it self may be the best part. Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix. I suppose folks on here can be negative as far as freedom of speech goes but I can't help to think that your all just jealous because you just too cheap, eskewed by logical reasoning to treat yourself to that so called placebo effect. To all you that think wieght doesn't matter, good luck riding whatever it is you ride and more importantly maintaining that excitement riding brings you.

I think it is great that the average joe / josephine can buy the same bikes on the pro tours. I have passed some of those bikes on the way back to the parking lot, but it is still nice to see that they are available for purchase.

(Just kidding with you)
__________________
My Blog
Felt_Rider is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 07:54 AM   #59
gemship
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
Actually, it was the engine and the team that won Paris-Roubaix.


Dam good riders, great team on a top bike. Ahh the prestige behind it, makes me so excited to take stock in my new r3sl. So what if it was the riders the bike is awesome. Just out of curiosity what do you ride?
gemship is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02.-2008, 08:00 AM   #60
dhk2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemship
whoa, harsh crowd on here. Seems like a few of you are quick to dicredit the benefits of a lighter bike. First of all it's hard to argue against the stats and science that justifies a nearly zero increase in speed given a substanstial wieght decrease, say 5 pounds give or take a couple. So I will agree there to a point. That being said I believe the benefits are a bit more than just a placebo effect. In fact it may be fair to look at the bigger picture. For most consumers when upgrading to lighter wieght there's also the upgrade of better groupo/components.I do believe the shifting does tend to get a bit more slicker at the high end for example. Not to mention the thought toward designing for added stiffness and areo.

If you really like bicycling enough to spend time on a forum or wear skin tight clothing then I believe it's perfectly okay to spend some dough on a nicer, racier ride. Perhaps it won't make you faster then again you may use less power to get up that same hill. Or you may find yourself having a easier time keeping up with your friends. Personally I'm looking forward to my new carbon Cervelo. It's going to be 7 pounds lighter than my Raliegh and an upgrade in everyway, that in it self may be the best part. Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix. I suppose folks on here can be negative as far as freedom of speech goes but I can't help to think that your all just jealous because you just too cheap, eskewed by logical reasoning to treat yourself to that so called placebo effect. To all you that think wieght doesn't matter, good luck riding whatever it is you ride and more importantly maintaining that excitement riding brings you. Fear not for if remember you on the day you decide to step up you game with a lighter bike I won't be the type of poster to rub in a double standard.

Believe you're confusing negativity with realism, and missing the fact that many of us who are responding are already riding lightweight, mid-to-high end equipment.

A 7 lb lighter bike is certainly going to make you faster on steep climbs, since speed at a given watt output is almost proportional to total weight for low-speed climbing. Saving say 20 seconds on a steep 10 minute climb is significant to many of us, although the reasons many vary. Expect to see a speed increase of 0.2 mph on your computer, not 2-3 mph, and you won't be disappointed.
dhk2 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet