![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Registered User
|
The main difference I notice between my aluminum and carbon bikes are stiffness (and of course components). When getting above 100 rpm on my alumium bike, it starts to really flexy, but my carbon bike doesn't feel flexy at all. I think the biggest advantage to weighing less is accelerations and of course climbing.
__________________
Scott CR-1 Pro -Garmin Edge 705 -Shimano Ultegra 10 -Mavic Ksyrium Elite -Fulcrum Racing 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
You may, but invariably they are different frames and you won't be sure if it's the weight difference or stiffness or other ride characteristics that's playing up for you. But it is true that every bike is different, although often subtle.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
The placebo effect is known as "New Bike Syndrome" around here. The duration seems to be up to one month for every $1K spent on the new bike, particularly if they are exotic italian brands or custom frames. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
Thats not good, I have only got a week left, must get out quick before it becomes hard again ![]()
__________________
Its not what you've got its what you do with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
There was a heated discussion on another forum where a owner claimed that his new Cervelo is 3.4km/h (initially said 4km/h) faster than his previously well maintained road bike. So it does not have to be Italian. Canadian will do too! ![]()
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Now, I went from a 25 lb, low grade steel bike from the 90s that didn't fit me well to a 19 lb, fairly recent Ultegra/Dura Ace grade Cannondale from a few years ago with similar change in wheels. But the new bike fits much better as well, and is so much fun to ride that I rode 10X more last summer than I had for many years. I ride 2 mph faster than the previous summer! Must be because of the weight of the bike and wheels, no! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
I think part of it is also a mental justification to prevent buyers' remorse. After all, if a person sank a grand or whatever into new equipment, an illusion of faster speed with the new toy will also help justify that expenditure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Registered User
|
Within that thread, the bike in question was a Cervelo Team Soloist. So the arguments were primarily with aero benefits. Hilarious.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
|
whoa, harsh crowd on here. Seems like a few of you are quick to dicredit the benefits of a lighter bike. First of all it's hard to argue against the stats and science that justifies a nearly zero increase in speed given a substanstial wieght decrease, say 5 pounds give or take a couple. So I will agree there to a point. That being said I believe the benefits are a bit more than just a placebo effect. In fact it may be fair to look at the bigger picture. For most consumers when upgrading to lighter wieght there's also the upgrade of better groupo/components.I do believe the shifting does tend to get a bit more slicker at the high end for example. Not to mention the thought toward designing for added stiffness and areo.
If you really like bicycling enough to spend time on a forum or wear skin tight clothing then I believe it's perfectly okay to spend some dough on a nicer, racier ride. Perhaps it won't make you faster then again you may use less power to get up that same hill. Or you may find yourself having a easier time keeping up with your friends. Personally I'm looking forward to my new carbon Cervelo. It's going to be 7 pounds lighter than my Raliegh and an upgrade in everyway, that in it self may be the best part. Plus I think its awesome that one can actually buy the same bike that won Paris Rubaix. I suppose folks on here can be negative as far as freedom of speech goes but I can't help to think that your all just jealous because you just too cheap, eskewed by logical reasoning to treat yourself to that so called placebo effect. To all you that think wieght doesn't matter, good luck riding whatever it is you ride and more importantly maintaining that excitement riding brings you. Fear not for if remember you on the day you decide to step up you game with a lighter bike I won't be the type of poster to rub in a double standard. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
Quote:
The point here is that you are quite welcome to get a bike that you think is nice. But then, if you come here and then claim that the use of the new bike suddenly increased your speed by x km/hr just because of the reduced weight, then expect other people to call your bluff. Also, I have no idea how better shifting by itself is going to have any impact on the average speed - unless the original equipment was so bad that you spent 10-15 seconds fiddling with shifting every time you wanted to shift up or down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Actually, it was the engine and the team that won Paris-Roubaix. ![]()
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,356
|
Quote:
I find that my DA components shift no better than 105 if I let them get dirty so keep your new bike clean. ![]() Quote:
I think it is great that the average joe / josephine can buy the same bikes on the pro tours. I have passed some of those bikes on the way back to the parking lot, but it is still nice to see that they are available for purchase. (Just kidding with you)
__________________
My Blog |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
Dam good riders, great team on a top bike. Ahh the prestige behind it, makes me so excited to take stock in my new r3sl. So what if it was the riders the bike is awesome. Just out of curiosity what do you ride? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
Believe you're confusing negativity with realism, and missing the fact that many of us who are responding are already riding lightweight, mid-to-high end equipment. A 7 lb lighter bike is certainly going to make you faster on steep climbs, since speed at a given watt output is almost proportional to total weight for low-speed climbing. Saving say 20 seconds on a steep 10 minute climb is significant to many of us, although the reasons many vary. Expect to see a speed increase of 0.2 mph on your computer, not 2-3 mph, and you won't be disappointed. |
|
|
|
|