Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


No Tour for Astana

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:14 AM   #151
poulidor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,017
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
The fact remains that ASO had no reason to remove Astana other than their hatred of Bruyneel and their bigotry.
The fact is ASO banned Astana because they have the power !
Bruyneel was the gag of last TDF seeking sponsors, that was a great pleasure and lot of laugh for everyone. What a Wally !
poulidor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:25 AM   #152
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by italiano

Yesterday, Tinkoff , owner tinkoff squad, sayd to one reporter, my friend: “while old guardia as Riis and Bruyneel stay in sport no order will be”

ROFLMAO. Yeah, Oleg Tinkoff is extremely concerned about doping. I haven't had such a good laugh in a long time.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:30 AM   #153
buckybux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 212
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

I think I know where you are making your mistake. You define doping as having a criminal charge, which means no doubt. But, this is a public opinion forum, and the standard here is preponderance. Astana had a history of doping in 2007. The team changed management, but did nothing to start a doping control program. Several riders with prior association with Bruyneel have been convicted of doping; Landis and Hamilton. Sounds to me like it was a logical decision. To ban a team, they don't need criminal, just preponderance and it appears to me that is what they had.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
No it doesn't mean squat. They can't trace the handling, who had the sample, who had access to the samples, where they were kept. And the test proceedures themselves were not followed. The samples would have been better handled and tested by first year chemistry students. The standards are in place for a reason - and that is to insure no mistakes are made and no tampering is done. With the handling of those samples, you cannot make either statement. The results are 100% meaningless, except to the buttheads on this forum who are looking for an excuse. The fact remains that ASO had no reason to remove Astana other than their hatred of Bruyneel and their bigotry.
__________________
He who dies with the most bikes.....Wins
buckybux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:36 AM   #154
poulidor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,017
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

ASO don't need to ban the doped DISCOTANA riders,
they did just not invite them !
poulidor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:47 AM   #155
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckybux
You define doping as having a criminal charge

No, most doping charges don't involve criminal charges. What I'm saying is that the cycling federations, the race organizers, WADA, and the UCI all have an official definition of doping. Under that definition Bruyneel's team has no positives. So are the race organizers going to conform to their own standards and do things in a professional manner, or are they going to make decisions based upon rumor, innuendo and hearsay.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:50 AM   #156
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 9,967
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Hey Tambourlain... while every cyclist in the world is either watching or competing in the Giro and the TdF, Astana can suck on a banana...

The once-Disco-but-now-we-love-Astana fanboys, like yourself, will probably like to use the banana for more pleasurable things...
__________________


Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:50 AM   #157
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by poulidor
The fact is ASO banned Astana because they have the power !

Quote:
Originally Posted by poulidor
ASO don't need to ban the doped DISCOTANA riders,
they did just not invite them !

Are you arguing with yourself now poulidor?
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:52 AM   #158
kennf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 534
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
Ah ...................moderated


I'm confused about the insult. Is an unadulterated piece of shit better or worse than an adulterated piece of shit?

Last edited by limerickman : 25-02.-2008 at 01:39 AM.
kennf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:57 AM   #159
poulidor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,017
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
Are you arguing with yourself now poulidor?
No I am just trying to find a answer which fit your needing !

An other ?

ASTANA won't be on TDF to be unpleasant with all disco fans!
poulidor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:59 AM   #160
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Hey Tambourlain... while every cyclist in the world is either watching or competing in the Giro and the TdF, Astana can suck on a banana...

And every cyclist in the world will know that the races are meaningless, since three of the five best, including the very best, will not be there. This year, if you want to call yourself the best, you will have to go to the Vuelta and win it. So if you think that's a great Giro or a great TdF, then it makes sense that you also think that a banana is an object of pleasure. This years Tour will be contested by three wheel suckers - Menchov, Evans and Valverde. And it will be won by a well doped up Menchov.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 10:59 AM   #161
buckybux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 212
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

But that is the standard they use, if there is any doubt they don't accept the lab test results. That means, a lot of riders are doping, but not getting caught. Astana and Bruyneel are doping, Astana got caught, Bruyneel hasn't yet. The EPO standard is 50% hematocrit, so riders still take EPO, but not too much so they don't exceed the 50%. Just because they don't test positive, does not mean the riders are not doping. It only means they are not being caught.



Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
No, most doping charges don't involve criminal charges. What I'm saying is that the cycling federations, the race organizers, WADA, and the UCI all have an official definition of doping. Under that definition Bruyneel's team has no positives. So are the race organizers going to conform to their own standards and do things in a professional manner, or are they going to make decisions based upon rumor, innuendo and hearsay.
__________________
He who dies with the most bikes.....Wins
buckybux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 11:04 AM   #162
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 9,967
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
And every cyclist in the world will know that the races are meaningless, since three of the five best, including the very best, will not be there. This year, if you want to call yourself the best, you will have to go to the Vuelta and win it. So if you think that's a great Giro or a great TdF, then it makes sense that you also think that a banana is an object of pleasure. This years Tour will be contested by three wheel suckers - Menchov, Evans and Valverde. And it will be won by a well doped up Menchov.
Levi didn't dope when he joned Disco. He just improved his 50km time trial time from 2006 by 5 mins, through learning the Carmichael-USPS-Disco secrets of high cadence.
__________________



Last edited by Crankyfeet : 24-02.-2008 at 11:32 AM.
Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 11:06 AM   #163
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 9,967
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
And every cyclist in the world will know that the races are meaningless, since three of the five best, including the very best, will not be there. This year, if you want to call yourself the best, you will have to go to the Vuelta and win it. So if you think that's a great Giro or a great TdF, then it makes sense that you also think that a banana is an object of pleasure. This years Tour will be contested by three wheel suckers - Menchov, Evans and Valverde. And it will be won by a well doped up Menchov.
Whatever you say..they'll still be sucking on a banana.... boo hoo....

It disheartens me that you are in such grief at your favorite team's exclusion. Now I am going to be very, very upset that tambourlain is unhappy.
__________________


Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 11:09 AM   #164
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,522
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
No, most doping charges don't involve criminal charges. What I'm saying is that the cycling federations, the race organizers, WADA, and the UCI all have an official definition of doping. Under that definition Bruyneel's team has no positives. So are the race organizers going to conform to their own standards and do things in a professional manner, or are they going to make decisions based upon rumor, innuendo and hearsay.

they know who is doping you muppet.

They know who is flying, ask Mcgee, the riders know who is doing what, it is evident on the road.

You assume that teams that avail themselves of sophisticated methods to beat the tests, should be given carte blanche to dope because of said "definition".

If anything from Balco, to OP has told you, if you wish for a dope free sport, you cannot rely only on direct analysis testing parameters. You need the policing authorites, non-analytical tests and so on, to butress the enforcement.
thunder is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 11:24 AM   #165
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 9,967
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
Ah ...................moderated.
Tambourlain isn't a bigot. He's an ultra-rightwing egalitarian. An oxy-moron...
__________________



Last edited by limerickman : 25-02.-2008 at 01:40 AM.
Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet