![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
|
Keep in mind the the number entered into the computer is 1917 which corresponds to .019168 Piotr had to correct me about a year ago because I took the typo formula from the KK web site.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
|
It is in mph but if you ad a column on the left to an Excel sheet for kph with the formula to convert to mph you could get kph easy enough.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 Last edited by wiredued : 20-02.-2008 at 01:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
I recently had to send my PT hub in for repair and have been using the speed curve for the past couple weeks when I discovered that my hub had been reading about 35w below what the speed *formula* would predict. I remembered some old conversation about that formula, but couldn't remember what came of it since I normally use my power hub. Looks like those extra 35w aren't coming my way after all. ![]() Edit: Hmmmm..... difference is only a couple watts (between the two formulae). Hopefully they'll calibrate my hub while they have it. I wonder if Kinetic uses a rolling resistance on that curve, or if that's purely the power to drive the unit? Could mean another 10-20 watts at the cranks for all the 300w-club hope-to-bes. ![]() Last edited by frenchyge : 20-02.-2008 at 01:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
|
I think it only dropped my FTP by about 4 watts when I made the correction.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 Last edited by wiredued : 20-02.-2008 at 01:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
http://www.shinpoly.co.jp/business/...pe_e/zebra.html I can tell you, for example, that Polar heart rate monitor and cycling watches also use the same method. This technology has been around for decades and is very mature, so I very much doubt is the fundamental issue with the Kurt Kinetic power computer. And, for disclosure's sake, I'm a very happy Kurt Kinetic Road Machine user of a number of years, but I don't own the power computer (I used to use a laminated power curve I prepared in Microsoft Excel using the published formulas). Berend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
|
Hi Ade,
Yes, I'd like to try a few before I go under the knife....assmuning the weather warms up a bit. I've got a business trip to Hong Kong coming up soon though. I'll be away for a couple of weeks with that, so that means 2 more weeks training lost. cheers John |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
|
Hi Ade,
It's all about the mindset, I think. When I started, I found it harder mentally rather than physically to do 20 mins on a TT. Once you get used to the pain you kind of become accustomed to it or are better able to deal with it and see a session through.. That's my take on it , anyway. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 127
|
I hate to discourage you all who are using the KK computer or are doing calculations or using the KK curves to determine your power...BUT, there's no way you're going to get accurate results. There are at least two reasons:
1. The KK machine itself is affected by temperature. As it warms up and cools down, power readings will vary significantly. 2. The power required to turn the KK is greatly influenced by the clamping pressure to the wheel. Further, it's very difficult to get the clamping pressure exactly the same every time you ride. Finally, the KK computer is nothing more than a cheap speedometer and the reading it gives assumes a constant clamping pressure, a standard temperature for the trainer and no wheel slip plus and accurate calibration for wheel size. These conditions are not likely to occur with any predictability. In general, if you want accurate power, get a real power meter. The KK computer can easily be off by 20% or more in the 200 to 300 watt range, and even more than that at lower powers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
They do shift during the warmup and cooldown, but are actually pretty stable (as advertised) in between. See this little experiment that I did with mine: http://www.cyclingforums.com/showpo...16&postcount=56 Quote:
I think the folks that are serious about using their KK computers do a coastdown test before each ride to try to standardize those factors, but you are correct. Most just seem to be looking for something cheap, yet more consistent than HR. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 464
|
Here's something I found re the KK power calibration. This is a comparison against a PT power meter.
It looks surprisingly good to me. http://www.planet-x-bikes.com/triat...age&PAGE_id=189 |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|