Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Kurt Kinetic computer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-02.-2008, 05:08 PM   #16
kant314
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itchy-Tichy
From the KK website:

Remember algebra? Good. The formula for the Cyclone and the Road Machine turns out to be a cubic function. If we let S stand for “speed” in miles per hour, and P stand for “power” in watts, the formulas are as follows:

Kinetic Cyclone:
P = (6.481090) * S + (0.020106) * S3

Kinetic Road Machine:
P = (5.244820) * S + (0.01968) * S3

For example, to calculate how much power is produced at a speed of 16.1mph while riding the Kinetic Road Machine, plug 16.1 in for “S.”

P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.01968) * (16.1)3

P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.01968) * (16.1) * (16.1) * (16.1)

P = 84.4416 + 82.13017

Power = 166.571 watts
so what you're trying to say is that the formula is for MPH.
__________________

kant314 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 11:24 PM   #17
wiredued
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Keep in mind the the number entered into the computer is 1917 which corresponds to .019168 Piotr had to correct me about a year ago because I took the typo formula from the KK web site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itchy-Tichy
From the KK website:

Remember algebra? Good. The formula for the Cyclone and the Road Machine turns out to be a cubic function. If we let S stand for “speed” in miles per hour, and P stand for “power” in watts, the formulas are as follows:

Kinetic Cyclone:
P = (6.481090) * S + (0.020106) * S3

Kinetic Road Machine:
P = (5.244820) * S + (0.01968) * S3

For example, to calculate how much power is produced at a speed of 16.1mph while riding the Kinetic Road Machine, plug 16.1 in for “S.”

P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.01968) * (16.1)3

P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.01968) * (16.1) * (16.1) * (16.1)

P = 84.4416 + 82.13017

Power = 166.571 watts
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3
wiredued is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 01:11 AM   #18
wiredued
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

It is in mph but if you ad a column on the left to an Excel sheet for kph with the formula to convert to mph you could get kph easy enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kant314
Is that speed in the formula in mph or km/h?
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3

Last edited by wiredued : 20-02.-2008 at 01:38 AM.
wiredued is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 01:12 AM   #19
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiredued
Keep in mind the the number entered into the computer is 1917 which corresponds to .019168 Piotr had to correct me about a year ago because I took the typo formula from the KK web site.
D'oh! I thought I remembered there being a typo involved in there somewhere.

I recently had to send my PT hub in for repair and have been using the speed curve for the past couple weeks when I discovered that my hub had been reading about 35w below what the speed *formula* would predict. I remembered some old conversation about that formula, but couldn't remember what came of it since I normally use my power hub. Looks like those extra 35w aren't coming my way after all.

Edit: Hmmmm..... difference is only a couple watts (between the two formulae). Hopefully they'll calibrate my hub while they have it.

I wonder if Kinetic uses a rolling resistance on that curve, or if that's purely the power to drive the unit? Could mean another 10-20 watts at the cranks for all the 300w-club hope-to-bes.

Last edited by frenchyge : 20-02.-2008 at 01:32 AM.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 01:32 AM   #20
wiredued
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

I think it only dropped my FTP by about 4 watts when I made the correction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenchyge
D'oh! I thought I remembered there being a typo involved in there somewhere.

I recently had to send my PT hub in for repair and have been using the speed curve for the past couple weeks when I discovered that my hub had been reading about 35w below what the speed *formula* would predict. I remembered some old conversation about that formula, but couldn't remember what came of it since I normally use my power hub. Looks like those extra 35w aren't coming my way after all.
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3

Last edited by wiredued : 20-02.-2008 at 01:39 AM.
wiredued is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 06:57 PM   #21
squidwranglr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 135
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by no1kung1
I opened up the old one to see if I can fix it. They use a VERY flimsy method of passing the electrical signal through to the screen. It is essentially two small rectangular pieces of foam that have conductive channels that sit on the top and bottom of the screen. They are barely glued into place and if they ever move out of place, realignment is a nightmare.
Just so you know (and assuming I'm not misunderstanding what you're describing), the compression polymer with conductive strips is a very common and industry-accepted way of passing signals from circuit boards to small LCD screens:

http://www.shinpoly.co.jp/business/...pe_e/zebra.html

I can tell you, for example, that Polar heart rate monitor and cycling watches also use the same method. This technology has been around for decades and is very mature, so I very much doubt is the fundamental issue with the Kurt Kinetic power computer.

And, for disclosure's sake, I'm a very happy Kurt Kinetic Road Machine user of a number of years, but I don't own the power computer (I used to use a laminated power curve I prepared in Microsoft Excel using the published formulas).

Berend
squidwranglr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 07:21 PM   #22
Ade Merckx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Talking Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by kant314
Hi guys,

I'm just about to put my damn KK trainer on ebay...I've just about had enough of it.
Don't get me wrong, I love the trainer. It has a great feel to it.
It's just the bloody crapy power computer they sell with it. £25 for something that looks like it was made in China in the 70's.
I've already sent 2 back and I'm on my third now. After a few weeks of use these things just seem to begin to go wrong.
The first one I had the buttons kept sticking so that you couldn't change the display screen without resetting everything. Then it started blanking out and going back to zero in the middle of a session. The 2nd one they sent me was dead on arrival and the third one resets the tyre calibration size half way through a session and changes to km/h. That's if it makes it through a 20 min session at all.

I real really wish I'd gone for another trainer with power.

I'd heard bad things about the KK power computer before I bought it but TBH I thought it really can't be that bad.

How wrong I was.


(rant over)
Hey John I just read your blog that a shame about you needing a knee op. Are you going to see how effective your training (311wattFT) has been by doing 1 or 2 races before you go under the surgeons knife? There's lots of 4th cat and 3rd cat races comming up and its a chance to really test yourself in the real' world. With that kind of sustainable power under the hood you should be fairly comfortabe. If you give me a shout I'll even come and join you
Ade Merckx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 08:57 PM   #23
kant314
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Hi Ade,

Yes, I'd like to try a few before I go under the knife....assmuning the weather warms up a bit.
I've got a business trip to Hong Kong coming up soon though. I'll be away for a couple of weeks with that, so that means 2 more weeks training lost.

cheers
John
__________________

kant314 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02.-2008, 10:18 PM   #24
Ade Merckx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by kant314
Hi Ade,

Yes, I'd like to try a few before I go under the knife....assmuning the weather warms up a bit.
I've got a business trip to Hong Kong coming up soon though. I'll be away for a couple of weeks with that, so that means 2 more weeks training lost.

cheers
John
Ok lets see how it worksh out, even just a 40min - 60min job at Hillingdon would be a nice psychological boost. Having ridden with the 19mph group quite a bit I'm sure your pack riding skill are ok. Have a look on http://www.britishcycling.org.uk/we...ventsfuture.asp in the south east region and let me know if you can make any of the races. If you post on the ACC site perhaps others may come along too. Anyway whatever happens keep training when you can. Its great to see you can now comfortably bang out 3 x 20's when last year you wouldn't go near a 2 x 20 with the proverbial barge pole
Ade Merckx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 12:38 AM   #25
kant314
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Hi Ade,

It's all about the mindset, I think.
When I started, I found it harder mentally rather than physically to do 20 mins on a TT.
Once you get used to the pain you kind of become accustomed to it or are better able to deal with it and see a session through..
That's my take on it , anyway.
__________________

kant314 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 01:12 PM   #26
Ergoman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 127
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

I hate to discourage you all who are using the KK computer or are doing calculations or using the KK curves to determine your power...BUT, there's no way you're going to get accurate results. There are at least two reasons:

1. The KK machine itself is affected by temperature. As it warms up and cools down, power readings will vary significantly.

2. The power required to turn the KK is greatly influenced by the clamping pressure to the wheel. Further, it's very difficult to get the clamping pressure exactly the same every time you ride.

Finally, the KK computer is nothing more than a cheap speedometer and the reading it gives assumes a constant clamping pressure, a standard temperature for the trainer and no wheel slip plus and accurate calibration for wheel size. These conditions are not likely to occur with any predictability.

In general, if you want accurate power, get a real power meter. The KK computer can easily be off by 20% or more in the 200 to 300 watt range, and even more than that at lower powers.
Ergoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 01:44 PM   #27
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ergoman
I hate to discourage you all who are using the KK computer or are doing calculations or using the KK curves to determine your power...BUT, there's no way you're going to get accurate results. There are at least two reasons:

1. The KK machine itself is affected by temperature. As it warms up and cools down, power readings will vary significantly.

They do shift during the warmup and cooldown, but are actually pretty stable (as advertised) in between. See this little experiment that I did with mine: http://www.cyclingforums.com/showpo...16&postcount=56

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ergoman
2. The power required to turn the KK is greatly influenced by the clamping pressure to the wheel. Further, it's very difficult to get the clamping pressure exactly the same every time you ride.

I think the folks that are serious about using their KK computers do a coastdown test before each ride to try to standardize those factors, but you are correct. Most just seem to be looking for something cheap, yet more consistent than HR.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 03:59 PM   #28
Yojimbo_
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 464
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Here's something I found re the KK power calibration. This is a comparison against a PT power meter.

It looks surprisingly good to me.

http://www.planet-x-bikes.com/triat...age&PAGE_id=189
Yojimbo_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 05:48 PM   #29
kant314
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
The KK computer can easily be off by 20% or more in the 200 to 300 watt range, and even more than that at lower powers.
where do you get those figures from?
__________________

kant314 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2008, 08:18 PM   #30
Ade Merckx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Cool Re: Kurt Kinetic computer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ergoman
I hate to discourage you all who are using the KK computer or are doing calculations or using the KK curves to determine your power...BUT, there's no way you're going to get accurate results. There are at least two reasons:

1. The KK machine itself is affected by temperature. As it warms up and cools down, power readings will vary significantly.

2. The power required to turn the KK is greatly influenced by the clamping pressure to the wheel. Further, it's very difficult to get the clamping pressure exactly the same every time you ride.

Finally, the KK computer is nothing more than a cheap speedometer and the reading it gives assumes a constant clamping pressure, a standard temperature for the trainer and no wheel slip plus and accurate calibration for wheel size. These conditions are not likely to occur with any predictability.

In general, if you want accurate power, get a real power meter. The KK computer can easily be off by 20% or more in the 200 to 300 watt range, and even more than that at lower powers.
Hey it would be nice if you could back up some of your claims of how innaccurate KK's are. I just wanted something that would help me train with a greater deal of accuracy than HRM and 'feel' and KK does the job. I will get a powermeter one day but I can't justify one at this point...Group rides with racers have shown I'm stronger than ever and thats what I'm after so hopefully it will show in races later this year.
Ade Merckx is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet