![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
|
I did a race today, 40 miles in 1:42:11, and my IF came out at 0.96. I haven't done any FTP testing for about a month -- time to bump the FTP? It was pretty variable, but it was a tough race.
NP 322, AP 262, FTP 335 thanks... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Definitely....... time to retest.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Why would you say definitely - .96 is definitely not 1.00. I'd hold off a bit and see if you have any other evidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
I guess one could look for more evidence before retesting, but I don't see the harm in testing anyway since it's been about a month. Just to clarify, I said it was definitely a cause to retest, not definitely a cause to raise FTP (which I would *not* recommend based on the info provided). FWIW, I tend to think that when a poster asks the forum if they should raise their FTP based on such and such, they really should be asking themselves if the ride warrants a retest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
|
I did something like this on the KKR last Saturday a 6x20 at 95% FTP but my 3x20s have never averaged higher than 99%. Should I wait until my recently started maintenance L5s (3x4s) raise the ceiling for my 3x20s to over 100% and then do a HOP test?
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
"Training is testing. Testing is Training" -- A. Coggan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
I'll 2nd these comments but add that if you think/feel your FTP has risen, typically it has .
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,121
|
Thanks for the input it just seemed strange compared with last years 6x20 at 88% PB.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
|
Thanks everyone. I'll work in some testing in the next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Oops, misread what you wrote. I definitely agree with this statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
I was trying to be cute. It obviously backfired. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 576
|
Quote:
Nah...some of us are just too slow to pick up on such suddle (I don't even know how to spell subtle) humor. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,571
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|