![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"PeteSig" wrote: > > Culpable driving can only occur when a driver causes the death of someone, > as a result of the driver's gross negligence (culpability). Any culpable > driving offence would have to parallel this. Make that 'any culpable cycling offence would have to parallel this' !!! -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"AndrewJ" <AJenningsFrankston@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:984ee9ab-1ade-4cd5-ac9f-cf3f7b86c1b1@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > Yup. I like to think that the publicity might have helped to push this > along, but whatever. I haven't heard about it. What happened? |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In aus.bicycle on Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:49:08 +1100
TimC <tconnors@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote: > > Zebee - remember that discussion about private mail at ork > addresses[1] in the Scary Devil Monastery? Given how close I've been > in the past to blacklisting gmail addresses in mail as well, I > consider the gmail POP solution particularly bad. They're the new > AOL. > I could simply change the address to my zip one, but I see no reason to. If people nuclear killfile then they do. I have a fairly heavy news habit and have had no reason to do something that silly. It's just the address on the from line after all, which has nothing to do with a references line, posting service or similar. Given how trivial they are to change killfiling on that seems to be rather luserish to me. If sod+dog has a gmail address, I really couldn't give a damn. It isn't like email addresses for most people are *real* or anything, with all the munging going on. Zebee |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-03-07, Zebee Johnstone (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: > I could simply change the address to my zip one, but I see no reason > to. If people nuclear killfile then they do. I have a fairly heavy > news habit and have had no reason to do something that silly. > > It's just the address on the from line after all, which has nothing to > do with a references line, posting service or similar. Given how > trivial they are to change killfiling on that seems to be rather > luserish to me. > > If sod+dog has a gmail address, I really couldn't give a damn. It > isn't like email addresses for most people are *real* or anything, > with all the munging going on. Ah, hadn't noticed (hadn't looked) that you in particular weren't posting through google, in which case my killing on the X-trace wouldn't affect you. It would score Bleve though, so I'd have to whitelist him. -- TimC Computer screens simply ooze buckets of yang. To balance this, place some women around the corners of the room. -- Kaz Cooke, Dumb Feng Shui |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
> > > I could simply change the address to my zip one, If zip gives you self set up, multiple email addresses, just set up a munged or dated one for usenet. Throw it away when the spam gets too much. |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In aus.bicycle on Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:43:26 +1100
Terryc <newsthreespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote: > Zebee Johnstone wrote: > >> >> >> I could simply change the address to my zip one, > > If zip gives you self set up, multiple email addresses, just set up a > munged or dated one for usenet. Throw it away when the spam gets too much. Nah, I have a bayesian filter that is very well trained on that address. I stopped using it when zip stopped having a shell server and I didn't have a permanent IP so I couldn't use my own shell server. ISP webmail is unusable because of spam, gmail's spam filter is very good so I use gmail for an address I can get to from anywhere. Finding a machine with ssh where I can safely attach the thumb drive with my ssh key is harder... Zebee |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mar 7, 10:07 pm, TimC <tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-
astro.swin.edu.au> wrote: > On 2008-03-07, AndrewJ (aka Bruce) > was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: > > > > > On Mar 7, 12:42 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.35v...@no- > > mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote: > >> AndrewJ Wrote: > > >> > For what it's worth I'm not a troll. I'm not going to extol the > >> > virtues of gmail, > >> > as I'm also a google shareholder. I don't use my work email as I don't > >> > want > >> > to spend all weekend working replying to emails :-) > > >> > (Yes, it does <look> like a troll, but I can post the x-ray of my arm > >> > if you want :-) ) > > >> And I've heard you being interviewed on Jon Faines show (ABC 774) about > >> the incident mentioned above, so you're obviously *not* a troll. > > > Yup. I like to think that the publicity might have helped to push this > > along, but whatever. > > > I've gone from "I'm not sure if I'll ride again" to "when I ride > > again". So I'm making progress :-) > > Onya. For what it's worth, I knew you weren't a troll ![]() > > I'm a little unsure as to why the offence is not amalgamated into the > culpable driving offence (I don't have the text of the culpable > driving offence at hand -- maybe it really can't fit). I believe I've > only ever heard "culpable driving" used in conjunction with "causing > injury|death" (this may be an artifact of a reporting bias in the > media - you don't hear about offences that don't result in injury - > because then you'd have 6502 stories on the news per night). > > As such, this may not be a dangerous move -- culpable cycling causing > death *should* be quite a punishable offence, as long as it truly is > culpable (and we are yet to see whether that guy truly was stepping > off a stationary tram or whether he was darting across the road > between trams, illegally jaywalking). But if it were ever to be used > for something stupid being done (running a red light), that didn't > then go onto create significant damage and/or injury, I'd be very > worried. As much as people will say otherwise, breaking the law on a > bicycle very rarely has the impact that breaking the law in a car has > often enough. Doing something stupid on a bicycle is not as damaging > as doing something stupid in a car, and so doesn't have cause to > invoke as great a punitive/corrective wrath from society. > > -- > TimC> cat ~/.signature > > Passing cosmic ray (core dumped) Yes, consider how many people are injured by encounters with bicycles every year, compared with encounters with cars. It's nowhere near the magnitude of the problem. But still it should not be possible to get away with (for example) running a red light through a pedestrian crossing and knocking a pedestrian to the ground with serious injuries. (Not in reference to any current case, I don't know the details sufficient to comment on those). |
|