![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Last edited by Steve_B : 18-03.-2008 at 06:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,117
|
Thanks Steve_B... Isn't 30s intervals considered L7? The acceleration I'm looking for is the kind that will keep me with the break away at the start of a race. I was caught unprepared last year in a 3 lap race on a 1mile per lap course when three riders moving much faster than the group passed everyone at the start on the outside and after the first lap could not even be seen any more. The gap was so big people were crossing the street as the gap went by... I suspect they were sand baggers.
Quote:
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Quote:
Those folks have a nice high FTP for the category they were racing. So, once again, we're back to why aerobic work should be the basis of your training. It is because a healthy aerobic system is so central to the demands of mass-start racing. That's not to say that L6 isn't important, just that it's not the dominant issue in the scenario you mention. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
The initial attack was definately anaerobic/neuromuscular/eyeball-searing and then as their anaerobic systems ran out of gas, their aerobic system took over. It had to allow them to recover from that attack but also carry on at such a high level than no one was going to bother to try to bridge. Looking at the time scale and the distances involved, the aerobic system is what really has the most effect in this scenario. Sure, a lightning fast jump is great for the shock value but had they not had a very high FTP, the group would probably have caught them eventually as their ability to replenish after the attack and keep riding hard to stay away was pushed to the limit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
|
Yesterday I tried L6 intervals again using ALL OUT pacing. On the first effort I set a PB for 1 minute power at 555 watt average. I'm finally in the "good" range of the Coggan power profile chart, and about 30 watts higher than my previous average.
On the successive intervals average power fell off considerably: 555 watts, 442, 400, 449, 412, and a final wimper at 376 average watts. Between each effort I was spinning easy (<150 watts) for at least 5 minutes. I planned to do 10 L6 intervals, but called it quits after the last effort which was closer to my VO2max power. Is this reasonable for a L6 workout? Do I just need to train L6 more? I would think I have a good enough base with all the L3/4 I have been doing (ctl=86). This got me thinking: what if instead of setting aside a day every other week to train L6, I instead do a single 1 minute L6/7 effort two days per week on the days when I do L3/4 training. I would get the same weekly avg volume at L6 and be able to maximize the quality of the L6 workout (target ~550 watt average). L4 would seem easy after a L6/7 effort, but is a single 1 minute effort enough to trigger adaptation? |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Draper, Utah
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
__________________
blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|