![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Burbank, California USA
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Afraid I may be more like you than you realize (I am a bicyclist btw). I also grin when I think about the effect on gas guzzlers (again, I am a cyclist who drives a '92 Nissan pickup -- is that too pampered by your utilitarian standard?) but I find it a hollow satisfaction that doesn't match the frustration of Big Oil raking in record profits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,479
|
Quote:
Hooooooweeeee! You sure got me with that one. Alas, I don't need a car or truck to get my dick hard. My condolences to you on that count. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 58
|
Yeah alienator nailed it, at least he calls a spade a spade. There are two lanes on the hiway, one for doing the speed limit, the other for those in a hurry. Mostly the fast lane is filled with land barges and jacked up 4x4s whose ground clearance for some reason seems to be directly proportional to the IQ of the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Medford, OR
Posts: 106
|
I always find it funny when my fellow Americans complain about $3 gas. Yeah, try Europe. Sure would like one of their sub-1 liter cars over here. Another thing that amuses me is people who use low quality, high sulfer, low lubricant petroleum diesel in their veggy burners. Whatever.
__________________
<- Get it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jeff City MO
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,386
|
Quote:
I would have thought that successive goverments in the USA would have made it a priority to develope public transports systems, given the disparsity of populations/towns across the country. It would make sense to connect all the major cities using rail connection - this would provide an alternative to car/plane travel and it would ensure lower fuel consumption/CO emmissions.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF morelike hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,585
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,386
|
Quote:
Yeah, I agree to a point. But cultural/societal behaviour can and does change, if the gov, wants it to change. Over here, the goverment (correctly) decided that disposable plastic bags were an environmental problem (they're not bio degradable, they're a pollutant). So they levied a tax on the purchase of disposable plastic bags - plastic bag sales have dropped. They did the same with banning smoking in public places (pubs/restuarants). Cleverly they enacted legislation stating that because public places - like pubs/restaurants - can/do employ people, that under health and safety, legislation was to be enacted to "protect the health of the worker". Cigarette sales have fallen.........and the employees of pubs/restaurants get to work in a more pleasant (less smokey) workplace. The amount of opposition to this legislation was huge -restaurant/pub owners said that their business "would be destroyed....... the social upheaval would be traumatic.......you can't expect people to give up the habit of a lifetime". All manner of excuses were used to try to postpone/stop this legisation. My point is - that if the US goverment really wanted to take on CO emmission issue.......it would enact policies which would encourage use of public transport and discourage private car usage, by developing public transport linkage.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF morelike hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,585
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,270
|
A lot of Americans have been brainwashed into thinking that bigger = safer. If you want to protect yourself against the maniac drivers you must have the biggest SUV available so that you can outweigh what ever hits you....
but it's actually quite untrue - a well designed car can protect you even if it is small, and in fact cars in general are safer than their larger counterparts. This little table was on a web site about debunking the "cycling is really dangerous" myth it's the odds of death vs injury in an accident by vehicle Bus 1 in 1000 Car, Station Wagon 1 in 108 Pickup, SUV, Van 1 in 75 Bicycle 1 in 71 Large Truck 1 in 43 Motorcycle, Motorbike 1 in 26 On Foot 1 in 15 as you can see an accident in a truck or SUV is only a little less dangerous than a cycling accident.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,585
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,270
|
Quote:
It's worse.... that's the odds that you will die, instead of being injured. Being hit by a car if you are on foot is bad news... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,585
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
I heard about the gas prices in Europe and you all are paying some crazy amounts. I know alot of people in Los Angeles complain because taking the public transportation is seen as low around here. Unlike in New York were everyone rich and poor taking public transportation or cabs. I've been catching buses and trains for a while to get around and laugh at people who have to pay for gas. I need a car because I've been traveling a loooong distances lately and need to make it easy for myself until my schedule calms down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,270
|
Quote:
Yes, if I'm reading it correctly- though I think that it does not take into account what exactly hits you in those figures. The fatalities for cyclists go down if you just look at accidents with cars v/s accidents with larger vehicles - 1 in 113 if hit by a car vs 1 in 47 for cyclits hit by SUV's. That still doesn't change the fact that accidents are more survivable in cars than in SUVs... I doubt that every SUV (or car) accident happens between vehicles of similar weights this is a little OT -but its an interesting web page http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm |
|
|
|
|