Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-03.-2008, 06:00 AM   #1
SUPER RIDER
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 70
Default Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

I am about to build up a new Cannondale Six 13 frame, and I'll like to get opinions on which Shimano components would serve me better as to reliability, longevity and just plain fun.

I am leaning this way:

Cranks - Dura-Ace

BB - Ultegra

Brakes - Ultegra

R. Derailleur - Ultegra

F. Derailleur - Ultegra

Shifters - Dura-Ace

I currently ride a Shimano 105 Triple, and have decided that my new build is gonna be a standard double.

All opinions are welcomed and appreciated.

Super Rider
SUPER RIDER is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03.-2008, 06:32 AM   #2
kdelong
Registered User
 
kdelong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,554
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Good mix, but why use any DA at all? IMHO, Ultegra is as good as DA but generally lasts longer as it is more substantial, albeit slightly heavier. Unless you are a real weight weenie, and you aren't because of all the Ultegra you are using, you would be better off in the wallet by sticking completely with Ultegra.
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it!
kdelong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03.-2008, 06:51 AM   #3
daveornee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 2,749
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER RIDER
I am about to build up a new Cannondale Six 13 frame, and I'll like to get opinions on which Shimano components would serve me better as to reliability, longevity and just plain fun.

I am leaning this way:

Cranks - Dura-Ace

BB - Ultegra

Brakes - Ultegra

R. Derailleur - Ultegra

F. Derailleur - Ultegra

Shifters - Dura-Ace

I currently ride a Shimano 105 Triple, and have decided that my new build is gonna be a standard double.

All opinions are welcomed and appreciated.

Super Rider

Current Cranksets include the Bottom Bracket so you will need to choose Ultegra or Dura Ace.
I certainly like both, but unless "coffee-shop points" are high priority, I suggest go with all Ultegra. Ultegra has the SL line and has grey or shiny silver colors too. My experience with both is good, but warranty on Dura Ace shifter/brake levers helped me through a replacement once, but wasn't long enough on the Ultegra to keep me riding for 3 years... so I guess that item would be up to your feel and finances.
__________________
David Ornee, Western Springs, IL USA
daveornee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03.-2008, 08:06 AM   #4
Powerful Pete
Registered User
 
Powerful Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,581
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Well, if you are serious about bang for your buck, just go with a complete ultegra setup. If you need to the latest and greatest, wait a bit and pay top dollar for the forthcoming 'new and improved' DA.
__________________
De Rosa Planet
Campagnolo Per Sempre!
PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
Powerful Pete is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03.-2008, 11:53 AM   #5
Fizzy23
Registered User
 
Fizzy23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER RIDER
I am about to build up a new Cannondale Six 13 frame, and I'll like to get opinions on which Shimano components would serve me better as to reliability, longevity and just plain fun.

I am leaning this way:

Cranks - Dura-Ace

BB - Ultegra

Brakes - Ultegra

R. Derailleur - Ultegra

F. Derailleur - Ultegra

Shifters - Dura-Ace

I currently ride a Shimano 105 Triple, and have decided that my new build is gonna be a standard double.

All opinions are welcomed and appreciated.

Super Rider


I have run both and you will be fine with Ultegra, shifts great....

You can loose the extra weight from around the waist to make up for what you gain with the Ultegra!!
Fizzy23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-03.-2008, 11:29 PM   #6
Peter@vecchios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER RIDER
I am about to build up a new Cannondale Six 13 frame, and I'll like to get opinions on which Shimano components would serve me better as to reliability, longevity and just plain fun.

I am leaning this way:

Cranks - Dura-Ace

BB - Ultegra

Brakes - Ultegra

R. Derailleur - Ultegra

F. Derailleur - Ultegra

Shifters - Dura-Ace

I currently ride a Shimano 105 Triple, and have decided that my new build is gonna be a standard double.

All opinions are welcomed and appreciated.

Super Rider


I agree with the other posters..these days, ultegra is DA, just with more steel, less aluminum, wee bit heavier.

For Dave, actually, when we buy a shimano crank, the BB is not included but no reason to get a DA over a ultegra.

Other points-why not use a 105 level cogset and chain-less cogs onto carriers for the cogset, not a shiney chain, otherwise identical performance to DA. Samo for the brakes, and really ders as well. 105 is not the 105 of old, cheezy, poorly performing. With 8/9s we never mentioned it for a bicycle, These days we do.
Peter@vecchios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-03.-2008, 12:27 PM   #7
ToffoIsMe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: new jersey
Posts: 309
Send a message via AIM to ToffoIsMe
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerful Pete
Well, if you are serious about bang for your buck, just go with a complete ultegra setup. If you need to the latest and greatest, wait a bit and pay top dollar for the forthcoming 'new and improved' DA.
Last article I saw about the new and improved dura-ace stated that the new carbon crank would retail close to $1,200
That could have possibly changed, as that article was almost a year ago.

Edit-This article is claiming $1,400! http://www.competitivecyclist.com/z...PRODUCT.ID=4593
ToffoIsMe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-03.-2008, 07:35 PM   #8
gemship
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 116
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToffoIsMe
Last article I saw about the new and improved dura-ace stated that the new carbon crank would retail close to $1,200
That could have possibly changed, as that article was almost a year ago.

Edit-This article is claiming $1,400! http://www.competitivecyclist.com/z...PRODUCT.ID=4593


Wow you could buy a decent bike for that much but I must say I really like the look of that crank.
gemship is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 02:11 AM   #9
LewisBricktop
Registered User
 
LewisBricktop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 79
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios

Other points-why not use a 105 level cogset and chain-less cogs onto carriers for the cogset, not a shiney chain, otherwise identical performance to DA. Samo for the brakes, and really ders as well. 105 is not the 105 of old, cheezy, poorly performing. With 8/9s we never mentioned it for a bicycle, These days we do.

I've used both 105 and Ultegra derailleurs and cassettes and noticed a great improvement with Ultegra. I would suggest restricting your bottom line to Ultegra.
LewisBricktop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 05:07 AM   #10
Peter@vecchios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisBricktop
I've used both 105 and Ultegra derailleurs and cassettes and noticed a great improvement with Ultegra. I would suggest restricting your bottom line to Ultegra.


10s or 9s? I would agree about 9s, not 10s. 105 10s cogsets are the same cogs, just more onto spidersor carriers for ultegra.
Peter@vecchios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 08:21 AM   #11
jcjordan
Registered User
 
jcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 497
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

The previous build on my bike was a full Ultegra set up which I recently (3 months ago) switched to a full Dura Ace so here is my comparison:
-Shifting. Under load, ie pressing hard going uphill, Dura Ace is a little quieter but still otherwise there is no comparison;
-STI Levers. The Dura Ace levers are a little bit thinner, which I find more comfortable, but other wise the same in shifting tension;
-Brakes. Big difference, Dura Ace breaks come on twice as quick and need a lot less force to do their job. This does mean until you get use to it you are more likely to lock it up if you come on hard, but its easier to do those slight trim breaking that you do constantly in races; and
-Reliability. Its Shimano, always works, doesn't need to be tweaked all the time (like Camply) what more can be said.

The primary difference is weight. The decision is whether the 300 or so grams are worth the extra dollars.

My only other two suggestions are to always use the Dura Ace chains over Ultegra. Dura Ace chains are actually made in Japan and last at least 2000km more then Ultegra.

For training I would still use a Ultegra cassette on the Dura Ace as the weight is not a problem and the cassettes last longer.
__________________
"Pain does not last, bones heal and chicks dig scars"
jcjordan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 08:59 AM   #12
Powerful Pete
Registered User
 
Powerful Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,581
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcjordan
-Reliability. Its Shimano, always works, doesn't need to be tweaked all the time (like Camply) what more can be said.
Meh. Never had trouble with my Campagnolo equipment. Requires no more or no less tweaking than my buddies who ride Shimano.
__________________
De Rosa Planet
Campagnolo Per Sempre!
PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
Powerful Pete is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 09:52 AM   #13
jcjordan
Registered User
 
jcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 497
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerful Pete
Meh. Never had trouble with my Campagnolo equipment. Requires no more or no less tweaking than my buddies who ride Shimano.

Fair enough. the couple of guys that I ride with that use campy are always having to re tune their rear derailleur as the cables seem to stretch more and over a longer time. One of them who owns the local LBS mentioned that this was just a Campy thing.
__________________
"Pain does not last, bones heal and chicks dig scars"
jcjordan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 10:03 AM   #14
Peter@vecchios
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcjordan
Fair enough. the couple of guys that I ride with that use campy are always having to re tune their rear derailleur as the cables seem to stretch more and over a longer time. One of them who owns the local LBS mentioned that this was just a Campy thing.


Hmmm, cables are cables. Few replace the original Campagnolo OR shimano with the maker's cables. If the LBS owber says it's a 'Campy thing', I wonder about his, well I just wonder. About 95% of the bikes we sell, but about 50% of the bikes we work on are Campagnolo and one thing we haven't had to ever do is warranty a shift lever from Campagnolo, but perhaps 3-4 dozen shimano.

Both do the same thing, albeit, a little differently. Durability of things like chains, cogsets, chainrings are a wash. BUT hubs and shifters, Campagnolo seem much more robust. As for chains, we sell DA and 105 level and both work and last the same. I think DA chains are made the same place as all shimano chains and the only difference is plating. There is nothing unique that makes a DA chain last 2000km longer than any other, IME. All, if taken care of and as measured by a Rohloff chain checker, last about 3000-3500 miles.

Just my observations and opinions after skulking in the bike biz as a wrench and owner for a coupla decades.
Peter@vecchios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-03.-2008, 11:24 AM   #15
jcjordan
Registered User
 
jcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 497
Default Re: Shimano Dura-Ace Or Ultegra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios
Hmmm, cables are cables. Few replace the original Campagnolo OR shimano with the maker's cables.


I have always used the manafactures cables. never thought to use anything else as they have always worked and never given me any trouble.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios
If the LBS owber says it's a 'Campy thing', I wonder about his, well I just wonder. About 95% of the bikes we sell, but about 50% of the bikes we work on are Campagnolo and one thing we haven't had to ever do is warranty a shift lever from Campagnolo, but perhaps 3-4 dozen shimano.


The mate from the LBS is a big fan of Campy, he just reckons that they need more ongoing tweaking, something that is agreed to by most people I know who ride with Campy. Which admitatly is fairly few as nearly everyone rides Shimano or the new Sram stuff here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios
Both do the same thing, albeit, a little differently. Durability of things like chains, cogsets, chainrings are a wash. BUT hubs and shifters, Campagnolo seem much more robust. As for chains, we sell DA and 105 level and both work and last the same. I think DA chains are made the same place as all shimano chains and the only difference is plating. There is nothing unique that makes a DA chain last 2000km longer than any other, IME. All, if taken care of and as measured by a Rohloff chain checker, last about 3000-3500 miles. ..


I have tried a number of chains, such as Conex, KMC, Ultegra and 105 but have generally found that the Dura Ace lasts much longer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter@vecchios
Just my observations and opinions after skulking in the bike biz as a wrench and owner for a coupla decades.
__________________
"Pain does not last, bones heal and chicks dig scars"
jcjordan is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet