![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
I've switched my frame a couple of times (Al frame + carbon fork) but have kept the 105 from frame to frame. It is an 8 speed group. It is still working well but I'm thinking about upgrading to 10 speed set up, so my question is: should I get the new 10 sp 105 or should I spend more and get the Ultegra.
Are there any advantages beside weight, better shifting, quieter shifting? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,554
|
The new 105 10Sp seems to be almost as good as the Ultegra. Either of them will out perform your 8Sp group. The only advantage that you have not listed is the bling factor from the Ultegra over the 105. But if you're worried about bling, get a DA set up.
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 479
|
No difference in performance except for a couple of grams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Unlike 8s and 9s, 105 10s is based on DA 10s with differences in materials is mostly all. Same performance and durability at a wee bit more weight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
Well, since I ride on the weekends and don't compete I think a couple of grams won't make a difference. The bling factor isn't that important either but I admit they look cool!
What about 9spd Tiagra? Do they work well or I'm better with the old 8spd 105? I'm running on 11-23, originally they were 12-23 but I bought an 11 sprocket and switch the 12 but there's a big jump from 11 to 13 which is the next available gear I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Unless you like the shape of the newer levers or if you need some gearing not available with 8s, if neither, if it works, keep it till it doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
After a while of not riding this bike (1.5 years, did some mountain bike but I like road bike a lot more) they where like stuck, I shifted up and they work fine but when going back to the smaller gears they did nothing, I spray some WD40 and they began working again after a while, maybe the old grease had dried or something. Then I lubricated them with some spray lube, since I was not able to take them apart for proper maintenance, they are in good shape now, they shift well. They are a little slugish going up or down between 4-5 gear (not the shifters since they click nicely) but the rest are near perfect. I don't know if this shifting issue has to do with me using an SRAM chain. Would an LX (9 speed) chain work with the 8 speed 105? Last edited by Solanog : 27-03.-2008 at 02:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
BTW, I'm considering only the shifters, chain and cassette, the rear deraileur should be fine, seems like the overall width of the cassette is the same or close enough so that the rear deraileur can be adjusted to work well. Also I was told that the hub will be O.K for the 10 speed cassette. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Western Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,554
|
Bump
__________________
One life, one chance. Don't waste it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Coast NSW Australia
Posts: 956
|
Quote:
Might be a good idea to renew your cables, both the inner & outer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,581
|
Quote:
__________________
De Rosa Planet Campagnolo Per Sempre! PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Match the chain to the cassette-8s to 8s, the SRAM works fine. What you are seeing is common on STI and using the 'STI repair kit', flush with WD-40 or a spray lube, is what we do also. If the RD is not toasted, it along with the FD will be fine with 10s STI. Rear hub as well. All you 'need' is levers, cogset and chain for 10s conversion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
I also did a flush to both the cable and the sleeve, they are shinny except for the exposed part that goes down the downtube. What I have not done and should is clean and lubricate both the hubs and the headset, the rest has been taken care of, I even cleaned the frame a little! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,113
|
I am making the same choice now. I don't trust hearsay because for all I know a brand new ultegra may shift less smoothly than a just broken in 105. The cables or derailleurs on any given bike may need a cleaning too. There could be several factors affecting subjective feel.
__________________
Your mouthwash ain't makin' it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
My 105s are working fine, I want the 10 speed but I think that my performance will be the same two cogs won't help too much, at least at my level. But they sure look good and give you a better range. I would like a 11-23 or 25 if available, currently I have 11-23 sometimes depending on where I'm going I switch to 12-23, 11-53 is fast but you have to pedal hard! |
|
|
|
|