![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#181 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <408104951p1h3i4uin0ltut5dkctsgnvr3@4ax.com>,
"Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute@DunderMifflin.com> writes: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:48:17 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> > wrote: > >> >> >>Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the >>transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. The >>result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly >>increased pollution and green house gases. > > That's so stupid, my head exploded. What he's saying is: he doesn't like buses 'cuz they sometimes cause him to slow his iron chariot down a little. Alas & alak! Woe, woe, and thrrrice woe! Anyways, don't worry about it. My brain plotzes numerous times a day, and Jack May is a Known Quantity. klahowya, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
|
|
|
#182 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Apr 12, 12:48 am, "Jack May" <jack....@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the > transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. The > result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly > increased pollution and green house gases. :-) Hilarious! - Frank Krygowski |
|
|
|
#183 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message news:ftpfrd$vsm$1@registered.motzarella.org... > Jack May wrote: >> "ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:8534cd92-d7fd-4e74-8440-7d5619291eda@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 11, 11:43 am, Eric Vey <jun...@ericvey.com> wrote: >> .. >> > Is Jack May a bot created by "Detroit"? I am a Silicon Valley engineer that lives in the real world. You apparently have no concept of the real world. |
|
|
|
#184 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute@DunderMifflin.com> wrote in message news:408104951p1h3i4uin0ltut5dkctsgnvr3@4ax.com... > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:48:17 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> > wrote: > >> >> >>Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the >>transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. >>The >>result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly >>increased pollution and green house gases. > > That's so stupid, my head exploded. The SF Bay area spends two thirds of its transportation funds to carry 5% of the travel. If you can't understand how that causes major problems, then you are worthless as a person. |
|
|
|
#185 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<frkrygow@gmail.com> wrote in message news:18bd5681-55d9-4920-8c96-35f0486b13fd@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 12, 12:48 am, "Jack May" <jack....@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> >> Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the >> transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. >> The >> result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly >> increased pollution and green house gases. > > :-) Hilarious! > In other words you are far too retarded to understand that spending two thirds of the transportation dollars to carry 5% of the travel is a major problem. |
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message news:ftn6fm$lmo$1@registered.motzarella.org... > Pat, an apparent member of the puny human species, wrote: >> On Apr 10, 11:39 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> >> wrote: > I believe changes will occur in human production of energy. The change > will be a negative one, as readily extractable, inexpensive hydrocarbon > sources disappear. It is too late in the day for the sensible choices of > more energy efficient societies, large scale renewable energy production > and a reasonable population size. Billions are being spent by extremely rich, extremely smart people that think you are wrong. > > Nuclear fusion might save the day, but there has been little progress in a > half century of experimentation, so that remains a long shot to achieve. Its a political decision. You only have to have Congress members get stuck in the cold and dark with no transportation to change the laws. |
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:7a3ea786-544d-48cb-9004-090a3ca562e7@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Apr 10, 11:57 pm, Pat <gro...@artisticphotography.us> wrote: > > > How can you deny that change is inevitable, constant and > > > unpredictable? > >This system denies change. We could have been riding EVs ("Who killed the electric car?) and even bikes for a long time. Yeah bikes, they are a terrific option for personal transportation. Not for antisocials like you who live in the boondocks, but for social monkeys. Food production is extremely inefficient. Using humans for motors is a way to starve to death a high percentage of the third world. Electric cars consume lots of energy and produce lots of pollution at the power plant, especially at coal powered plants. |
|
|
|
#188 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:51:15 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net>
wrote: >The SF Bay area spends two thirds of its transportation funds to carry 5% of >the travel. If you can't understand how that causes major problems, then >you are worthless as a person. Check New York City. |
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute@DunderMifflin.com> wrote in message news:bmg204tcrh7pb8gh7rosb0ahntmm89v2mk@4ax.com... > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:51:15 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> > wrote: > >>The SF Bay area spends two thirds of its transportation funds to carry 5% >>of >>the travel. If you can't understand how that causes major problems, then >>you are worthless as a person. > > > Check New York City. NYC is not an example of anything that can be done in other cities. I am surprised you would use such a ridiculous statement. What you have to understand that transportation is a complex system with all forms of transportation affecting all other forms of transportation. Apparently some of the people above are completely unable to understand the fundamental concepts of systems. You also have understand that there is not unlimited money available for transportation. Spending excessive amounts of money for little used transportation obviously reduces money for heavily used transportation which is required to keep the economy and employment strong. |
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> writes:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message > news:ftpfrd$vsm$1@registered.motzarella.org... > > Jack May wrote: > >> "ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> news:8534cd92-d7fd-4e74-8440-7d5619291eda@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > >> On Apr 11, 11:43 am, Eric Vey <jun...@ericvey.com> wrote: > >> > . > >> > > Is Jack May a bot created by "Detroit"? > > I am a Silicon Valley engineer that lives in the real world. You apparently > have no concept of the real world. Care to explain what sort of engineering you actually do if any? Based on previous posts, I thought you claimed to be a manager or some sort. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#191 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Zaumen wrote:
> "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> writes: > >> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:ftpfrd$vsm$1@registered.motzarella.org... >>> Jack May wrote: >>>> "ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8534cd92-d7fd-4e74-8440-7d5619291eda@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >>>> On Apr 11, 11:43 am, Eric Vey <jun...@ericvey.com> wrote: >>>> >> . >>> Is Jack May a bot created by "Detroit"? >> I am a Silicon Valley engineer that lives in the real world. You apparently >> have no concept of the real world. > > Care to explain what sort of engineering you actually do if any? Based > on previous posts, I thought you claimed to be a manager or some sort. > Sales engineering? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message > news:ftpfrd$vsm$1@registered.motzarella.org... >> Jack May wrote: >>> "ComandanteBanana" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:8534cd92-d7fd-4e74-8440-7d5619291eda@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >>> On Apr 11, 11:43 am, Eric Vey <jun...@ericvey.com> wrote: >>> > . >> Is Jack May a bot created by "Detroit"? > > I am a Silicon Valley engineer that lives in the real world. You apparently > have no concept of the real world. > Silly Cone Valley is the real world? Hardly representative of 99.9% of the real world. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#193 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jack May wrote:
> "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)" > <DwightSchrute@DunderMifflin.com> wrote in message > news:408104951p1h3i4uin0ltut5dkctsgnvr3@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:48:17 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the >>> transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. >>> The >>> result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly >>> increased pollution and green house gases. >> That's so stupid, my head exploded. > > The SF Bay area spends two thirds of its transportation funds to carry 5% of > the travel. If you can't understand how that causes major problems, then > you are worthless as a person. > 5% of ALL funds (which would include all expenditures on privately owned motor vehicles) or 5% of public funds? Either way, have a citation for that figure? Does it include the cost of maintaining roads used by privately owned vehicles? What about the cost to other departments such as law enforcement for patrolling public roads, etc? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jack May wrote:
> <frkrygow@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:18bd5681-55d9-4920-8c96-35f0486b13fd@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 12, 12:48 am, "Jack May" <jack....@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> Public transit maximizes global warming by spending most of the >>> transportation dollars to transport an insignificant number of people. >>> The >>> result is increased congestion caused by transit resulting in greatly >>> increased pollution and green house gases. >> :-) Hilarious! >> > In other words you are far too retarded to understand that spending two > thirds of the transportation dollars to carry 5% of the travel is a major > problem. > Gee, so the government is now subsidizing all the costs of private motor vehicles? What about non-motorized private vehicles? Where do I sign up to have the government buy me a new bicycle? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#195 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message > news:ftn6fm$lmo$1@registered.motzarella.org... >> Pat, an apparent member of the puny human species, wrote: >>> On Apr 10, 11:39 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> >>> wrote: > >> I believe changes will occur in human production of energy. The change >> will be a negative one, as readily extractable, inexpensive hydrocarbon >> sources disappear. It is too late in the day for the sensible choices of >> more energy efficient societies, large scale renewable energy production >> and a reasonable population size. > > Billions are being spent by extremely rich, extremely smart people that > think you are wrong. They are not extremely smart, just cunning, ruthless and greedy. >> Nuclear fusion might save the day, but there has been little progress in a >> half century of experimentation, so that remains a long shot to achieve. > > Its a political decision. You only have to have Congress members get stuck > in the cold and dark with no transportation to change the laws. > Congress can change the laws of nature? Wow! -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|