Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
11-04.-2008, 08:58 PM
|
#61 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 421
|
Re: EPO? Yes of no?
Quote:
This going to change the topic here...... Wasn't it that dodgy French News paper who printed yet another story on "We have proof that Lance doped"? Then when the lawyers pressed them they claimed to have a reliable source who did the test on the '99 sample, but refused to produce the person or the test documents. I find this dodgy as nobody would have been legally aurthorised to do any retrospective testing on any of Lances samples. Who of Lance's team or team mates have claimed to have had first hand direct experience observing Lance doping? Hell your best riding buddy could "claim" to have seen you dope. Where's the proof? Lance was young and inexperienced at stage races. Before his cancer treatment he was the wrong built for stage racing or anything too hillie, but he did have a nice handfull of elite victories. Not only did he return from his cancer treatment more trimmed (lost all his muscle tone and only put back on the cycling muscle not Triathlon muscle from his youth, but he also had grown to love the pain of cycling, it made him remember he was alive. You take a elite athele and give them a body and mind make over like that and you watch them change thier level of performance. HOWEVER I can not say Lance has never taken substances that are now illegal. But I'm yet to see anybody prove that he did take substances that at the time were against UCI or Olympic rules.
__________________
******BLATANT ADVERTISING ALERT****** I have ceramic bearings for: Campy/Fulcrum high end hubs/wheels Shimano hubs and pedals check out my ebay items here |
|
|
|
|
12-04.-2008, 01:47 AM
|
#62 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 5,781
|
Re: EPO? Yes of no?
Quote:
WADA ordered retrospective testing of the 1999 TdF urine samples. They also tested the 1998 ones. Forty 1998 samples were positive for EPO. Twelve 1999 samples were positive. No one knew who the samples belonged to because they were coded with the original doping control numbers and only the UCI had the key. Unfortunately for Armstrong, a French newspaper tricked him into authorizing the release of his 1999 control forms that had the control numbers. Armstrong thought that he was putting to rest the rumor that he had a TUE for continuing use of drugs from his cancer treatment. The real reason the newspaper asked was because they had obtained the retrotesting results. After matching the Armstrong's control numbers with the results, six of the positive 1999 samples turned out to the Armstrong's. This is also the reason why no one knows who the other positive 1999 samples or the positive 1998 samples belong to; the UCI has kept the control numbers hidden (although in the 1999 case all the prologue samples tested were positive and we know who was tested even though we don't know which exact sample, other than Armstrong's, belongs to who).
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
