![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#121 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 207
|
Thanks for looking this up. Interesting.
Quote:
Likewise, Maaskant finished 4th with carbon wheels, but big Maggie's wheel failed. If only half of a team's riders finish because their wheels fail, that is not good enough. I'm just not sure of the proportions. If Hincapie's first replacement wheel was a 32-spoke Ambrosio rim Roubaix special, then maybe they're not a panacea after all. If it was another carbon 20-spoke wonder-wheel, the accusations stand. Quote:
True. Quote:
Don't know the answer to that. The new version of the Team SC, the Premium, is still used by the Topsport Vlaanderen team. None of that carbon fibre stuff that Merckx puts his name to, even if costs a damned sight more. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 3,619
|
Drongo, given the pave' at the Roubaix, no wheel is a panacea and can be relied upon 100%. Having said that, it seems logical to me that I would ride an Ambrosio 32 or 36 spoke rim in that kind of race with a super comfy tubular, rather than risk a CF wheel.
__________________
De Rosa Planet Campagnolo Per Sempre! PAOLO BETTINI CAMPIONE DEL MONDO x 2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,916
|
Jezus Christ if we start taking gospel from the marketing guy we're all doomed.
Here lies the problem with Hincapie; Mark Madiot said in this month's Cycle Sport that FDJ spend around 100,000 euros on equipment alone for Roubaix. Thats one race. Whereas Hincapie would be hemorrhaging that sort of cash on doping products 2-3 times a year. Hincapie's success (for lack of better term) came from doping not from spending money and time on his equipment... now thats he's given up the dope he doesn't know the real and true value of cycling..... George an open letter you: Preparation is not doping and hard work and planning win races. Leave cycling now and leaves us all alone. You're a fool. WBT out. Quote:
Last edited by whiteboytrash : 17-04.-2008 at 06:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,788
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,159
|
Quote:
__________________
If this van is a'rockin, don't come a'knockin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barwon Prison via Collingwood
Posts: 3,354
|
You can't win the race if you can't finish it. You are unlikely to win if you are pushing the envelope so far on your equipment there is a big chance it will fail. Deep dish carbon rims in Paris-Roubaix are stupid. Hincapies constant punctures and equipment failures in P-R aren't bad luck, they are dumb luck.
FWIW, Roger De Vlaeminck allegedly punctured only once in all the years he rode Paris-Roubaix.
__________________
Collingwood - 2008 AFL Premiers classic1 is on the bandwagon early this year Last edited by classic1 : 17-04.-2008 at 11:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
How much time would the deep dish rims save you? I would imagine everyone using them knew they would be more likely to have some sort of mechanical but if they thought that the only way they could win was to take a chance then why shouldnt they? If they looked at the start list and thought safe wheels will get me a fifth place but the faster wheels could be the thing that gets me into the top three or wins then i can see why some would choose this way. Is it really that different from launching an all-out attack from a group when you know you dont really stand much of a chance of winning the sprint? Did anyone manage to make it to the finish with no problems with the deep dish rims? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barwon Prison via Collingwood
Posts: 3,354
|
Fragile wheels save you nothing if they fark up and you are left standing on the side of the road with your broken wheel in one hand and your limp snag in the other. In P-R reliability is everything.
Deep rims are less forgiving, they tend to chatter on rough surfaces, carbon generally doesn't take impact as well as metal, deep rims don't give as much as box section rims, the braking surfaces on carbon isnt as good as on Aluminium, they have less spokes so go out of true more when a spoke breaks. Reliability and reducing risk of mechancial failure is 10 times more important than any dubious speed gain from deep rims. Again, deep dish wheels are a stupid choice in P-R. Look what the top three were riding. It wasn't deep rims. And no one in a race like P-R looks at a start list and thinks deep rims are going to make the difference between 3rd and 5th.
__________________
Collingwood - 2008 AFL Premiers classic1 is on the bandwagon early this year |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 5,837
|
Maaskant's power output for P-R.
http://www.saris.com/athletes/Comme...a189bc10c4.aspx Maaskant's 272 Watts over 6:06 FLandis's stage 17: 281 Watts over 5:23
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,388
|
Quote:
not normalised for generic weight tho? MM is nearly 20% heavier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: With my kids if not biking or at my computer
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
maybe 10-15% he sprinter - 76k.. other problem...no nonpedaling time...
__________________
For inches and centimetres, let fools contend." -- Damian Grammaticus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 8,832
|
If you read the comments below the diagrams... they smoothed out the graphs (averaged the power over slightly longer intervals than the power tap recorded I guess), which took away the zero power at zero cadence.
__________________
Originally posted by Frigo's Luggage... "[Calling him] 'dickcheese' is the insult of a master. Some people work in oil, some people work in clay. He [thoughtforfood] works in profanity. Open your mind and enjoy its beauty." |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,916
|
Quote:
Could someone be kind enough to interpret this data for me ? Is this good for Maaskant or bad ? what is the relationship to Landis's ride ? |
|
|
|
|