Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-04.-2008, 12:38 PM   #61
Steve_B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
As I am sure you know, the question is not whether one needs a PM for training but whether using a PM is demonstrably better than other available training methods.
Can you explain to us what the apparently singular method of training with a power meter is? Because we certainly don't know what it is. If there was only one way, there wouldn't be a forum here for this because there would not need to be any questions.
Steve_B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 12:39 PM   #62
Steve_B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
One of them did. :-)
Anecdotal.
Steve_B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 12:42 PM   #63
Steve_B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
Of course, as I suspect you know, that is anecdotal evidence.
Frank, stop being two-faced.
Steve_B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 02:09 PM   #64
swampy1970
Registered User
 
swampy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 278
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squint

Training with power works. Powercranks don't.

For those who still think Powercranks might work, check out SmartCranks for a non-spamming alternative to Powercranks:

http://www.smartcranks.com/main_e.htm

Powercranks don't work, aye? I'd say otherwise, given that I've been using a pair for the past 5 months. I'm guessing you haven't.

I'll go out on a limb here and say of all the purchases I've made on bike stuff since '85 (disks, trispokes, deep rim wheels, time trial bikes, tubulars that weigh less than a gnats dick and always seem like they cost more per ounce than 24k gold, the $500 Polar HRM back in 91...) I'd say that my PowerCranks have been the most single effective piece of equipment and one that in a shortish time frame has brought about the biggest performance increase. That they're also the heaviest piece of kit on the bike (Frank - please don't model the next generation of PowerCranks on the stone pilars of Stonehenge!) doesn't detract from the fact that I'm climbing better than I have done in years. I've done similar training the past few years - and I'm the same weight as I was this time last year but I'm going up hills not only faster but I can climb for longer too.

They've given me a better pedaling action - one that's pointed out my weak spots like the fact that I'd previously been over utilizing my quads and they pretty much forced me to start using my hamstrings more (which used to make me wonder when I used to race why I never got cramps or felt really bad in my hamstrings or calf muscles even after a very hard 50 mile TT.) After the adaption period from hell, I feel like I'm more evenly utilizing the different muscle groups - which is most apparent on the hills over 6%. I can actually pedal up those rather than mashing. It's smooth... It's hard to describe - things just feel more efficient.

They say that once you've learned to ride a bike you never forget. Either I completely forgot how to pedal in the decade I had off the bike or I never really knew how too in the first place.

I still remember, at the Death Ride expo last year someone at the Power Cranks stall saying that I should have bought some Power Cranks instead of the new wheels (but I needed new wheels to make the jump from 7 speed to 10 and a friend was selling them for a good price...) but in hindsight they were probably right. I'm kinda kicking myself for not making the purchase earlier as I'd been thinking about it for quite a while...

... plus I have numbers from the last couple of years that prove I'm faster and 12 months of HR data to prove that for a given weight, not only am I faster at a lower heart rate, I also perceive the effort (perceived by leg discomfort)to be less and I recover faster. Training the last couple of years has been pretty much the same old routine with incremental improves coming from weight loss and increase in fitness - the past 5 months has been nothing short of wonderous...

The only downside is the "3 hour wall of pain" that I run into, where the muscles that were never really used pre-Power Cranks just give up, mainly because I don't ride for longer than 3 hours and I don't have the strength/coordination to ride with PowerCranks for that period of time...

... plus my wife digs the fact that my legs look better and are bigger! Hey, the 'benefits' from that are worth it in itself.
swampy1970 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 02:35 PM   #65
Fday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 610
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_B
Can you explain to us what the apparently singular method of training with a power meter is? Because we certainly don't know what it is. If there was only one way, there wouldn't be a forum here for this because there would not need to be any questions.
Are you saying this forum exists because most of you purchased PM's and can't figure out how to get improved benefit from them from what you were doing before?

I mean, really? I would have thought it was for you to learn from each other how to squeeze more out of the device starting from a basic tenet. Guess I was wrong.

Dr. Coggan wrote a book on training and racing on power. I presume I am talking about whatever is recommended in that book or any other use most of you would consider to be acceptable. I don't care what the method of use is. If the benefits are large enough and reasonably repeatable then everyone should be able to learn and understand it and the benefits available to most, if not all. I was just trying to figure out what the magnitude of that improvement might be, if any.
Fday is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 02:42 PM   #66
Fday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 610
Talking Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by swampy1970
Powercranks don't work, aye? I'd say otherwise, given that I've been using a pair for the past 5 months. I'm guessing you haven't.

I'll go out on a limb here and say of all the purchases I've made on bike stuff since '85 (disks, trispokes, deep rim wheels, time trial bikes, tubulars that weigh less than a gnats dick and always seem like they cost more per ounce than 24k gold, the $500 Polar HRM back in 91...) I'd say that my PowerCranks have been the most single effective piece of equipment and one that in a shortish time frame has brought about the biggest performance increase. . ..
Hey Swampy. I see you left a PM off your equipment list. If only you had gotten one of those instead of the PC's you would be seeing much bigger gains now. LOL.

We will be at Death Ride again. Hope to see you there.
Fday is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 04:04 PM   #67
Alex Simmons
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Time for the spam filter to be updated.
__________________
Alex's Cycle Blog
RST Training
Alex Simmons is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 04:40 PM   #68
Sillyoldtwit
Registered User
 
Sillyoldtwit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: IN PEACE AND QUIET
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Have just read this thread from beginning to end and my head is spinning from the arguments going around in circles ad nauseum.

Frank I don't know if you have read my 'It's killing me thread' and couldn't really care less whether you have or haven't. To cut a long story short, starting 28 months ago with a FTP of 130 Watts, I have now, using a power meter as a guide have an FTP of 315Watts and climbing. Purely anecdotal I know!
To give your argument a little credit, maybe I could have made almost the same amount of progress with structured training. (20 minute intervals etc.) However, I say almost because it seems to me that no one has mentioned the psychological benefit of using a power meter. That is, for example if you see concrete evidence that you are generating say 250watts for your 20 minute intervals, then that in itself is inspirational in making you want to better that figure ASAP. If you were relying on perceiving the effort you were making, you could be way out, especially if you are feeling under par. Power meters are like photographs - THEY DON'T LIE!! (or at least lie in constant fashion )

The above argument is even truer when doing 5 minute VO2Max intervals and you are increasing the load in 5 watt increments (or even less) over time. Perceived effort with VO2Max intervals are always bloody hard and unless you know exactly what power you are generating how can you measure your progress with any accuracy. Tyson
__________________
Sillyoldtwit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 04:40 PM   #69
swampy1970
Registered User
 
swampy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 278
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
Hey Swampy. I see you left a PM off your equipment list. If only you had gotten one of those instead of the PC's you would be seeing much bigger gains now. LOL.

We will be at Death Ride again. Hope to see you there.

I left it off the list because I don't own one. I'll probably get one at some point but it'll be to help fix the one area that I've always had a problem with - those pesky 30 seconds max efforts. I know I'm crap at those - but how bad I'm not too sure but for now HR data is enough for me.

Aint too sure how I'm going to read the LCD display, whilst out of the saddle at 100rpm in a big gear though.

I could always just go old school and just figure that out in races but that would take up too much family time.... Maybe I should just try to keep up with Yamaha R1's when setting off from the stop lights.

Alex - I had some Spam down at the hawaiian restaurant the other day - spam, fried eggs and rice! Yum.

Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam.
Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!
Spam spam spam spam!



... oh, nice manbag you have there.
swampy1970 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 05:01 PM   #70
swampy1970
Registered User
 
swampy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 278
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillyoldtwit
Have just read this thread from beginning to end and my head is spinning from the arguments going around in circles ad nauseum.

Frank I don't know if you have read my 'It's killing me thread' and couldn't really care less whether you have or haven't. To cut a long story short, starting 28 months ago with a FTP of 130 Watts, I have now, using a power meter as a guide have an FTP of 315Watts and climbing. Purely anecdotal I know!
To give your argument a little credit, maybe I could have made almost the same amount of progress with structured training. (20 minute intervals etc.) However, I say almost because it seems to me that no one has mentioned the psychological benefit of using a power meter. That is, for example if you see concrete evidence that you are generating say 250watts for your 20 minute intervals, then that in itself is inspirational in making you want to better that figure ASAP. If you were relying on perceiving the effort you were making, you could be way out, especially if you are feeling under par. Power meters are like photographs - THEY DON'T LIE!! (or at least lie in constant fashion )

The above argument is even truer when doing 5 minute VO2Max intervals and you are increasing the load in 5 watt increments (or even less) over time. Perceived effort with VO2Max intervals are always bloody hard and unless you know exactly what power you are generating how can you measure your progress with any accuracy. Tyson

S.O.T. - I gotta say that your exploits have made for a very interesting read and hats off to you for some truely amazing progress....

Y'all need to lighten up some. I just think that Frank is out to have some fun here and is yanking y'alls chains.

Plus people say that heart rate monitoring is too inacurate - but at 300watts, the PowerTap 2.4 SLs are +- 5watts. Are you riding at 300watts one day when you should only be getting 295 but two days later you're riding at 290 and you showing 295.... Are they consistantly out during the course of a test or do they fluctuate from -1.5% to 0 and the to +1.5? If you're dealing with 5 watt increments as a basis of a test or training session then that's a big deal. You could see power go up 15 watts and you've not really changed the power output...

Pick your method of madness - learn it's strengths and weaknesses, make your decisions and trust in them. Figure out some way of quantifiably testing your progress but have fun in the process too - cause fun is what it's all about, no?
swampy1970 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 08:03 PM   #71
fergie
Registered User
 
fergie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 377
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by swampy1970
Figure out some way of quantifiably testing your progress
Yeah, my power meter.

Ha ha, from the Powercrank site...

Quote:


PowerCranker takes over KOM jersey in Tour of California sustaining 12.5 w/kg for 30 seconds to do it
April 22, 2008. Congratulations to Frank Pipp for taking over the KOM jersey in the second stage of the Tour of Georgia. He sustained 874 watts for 30 seconds, a whopping 12.5 watts per kg to win the jersey. His power file is available on-line for this ride.


Good thing he had a powermeter to quantify his progress!
fergie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 09:16 PM   #72
Felt_Rider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,156
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by swampy1970

Y'all need to lighten up some. I just think that Frank is out to have some fun here and is yanking y'alls chains.


I kind figured that as soon as I saw the thread title and most importantly who started the thread. Stirring the Pot amongst the power guys

From my perspective as a non-user I believe all these guys use the PM purely as a tool as noted by the posts here. By their own success in personal growth in personal effort the PM does not need any more proof or written scientific documentation. They have experienced it and are now convinced of it. On the same side there are the multitudes like Frank who have either lost theirs or sold theirs on ebay because they did not find tracking data very useful or too bothersome or perhaps were a bit discouraged when the PM told them the discouraging news of truth - weak power output.

So my point is so what if no one can write or point to the evidence Frank is requesting as long as the many users like Tyson can track progress and be encouraged by it the PM has become a very useful tool.
__________________
My Blog
Felt_Rider is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 09:22 PM   #73
Steve_B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
Are you saying this forum exists because most of you purchased PM's and can't figure out how to get improved benefit from them from what you were doing before?
Frank, go back and read this. Point C.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
I mean, really? I would have thought it was for you to learn from each other how to squeeze more out of the device starting from a basic tenet. Guess I was wrong.
Yeah, you are wrong because your reading comprehension is awful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
Dr. Coggan wrote a book on training and racing on power. I presume I am talking about whatever is recommended in that book or any other use most of you would consider to be acceptable.
That book does not advocate any particular method of training. There is no method of training implied with a power meter or HRM or RPE or stopwatch or even power cranks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fday
I don't care what the method of use is.
Well, you damn well better because it's central to this argument. Any tool can be misused.Using your logic, if I didn't get great results trying to turn a screw using a hammer, I should go around telling the world, "see, hammers are useless!" You are being ridiculous. Again, I point you back to this. Point C.

I'm close to being done with this. It's like talking to a wall.
Steve_B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04.-2008, 09:50 PM   #74
Steve_B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 438
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by swampy1970
I just think that Frank is out to have some fun here and is yanking y'alls chains.
Maybe. Or revenue stream diversion (to PMs) is messing with his comprehension.
Steve_B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-04.-2008, 03:07 AM   #75
rmur17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 918
Default Re: What is the evidence that training with power is superior to . . .

[QUOTE=Steve_B]Frank, go back and read this. Point C.

Yeah, you are wrong because your reading comprehension is awful.

That book does not advocate any particular method of training. There is no method of training implied with a power meter or HRM or RPE or stopwatch or even power cranks.

Well, you damn well better because it's central to this argument. Any tool can be misused.Using your logic, if I didn't get great results trying to turn a screw using a hammer, I should go around telling the world, "see, hammers are useless!" You are being ridiculous. Again, I point you back to this. Point C.

I'm close to being done with this. It's like talking to a wall.[/QUOTE]

Steve,
That's the very reason I avoided posting here or even reading much of the thread ...
__________________
rmur
rmur17 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet