![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Andre Jute wrote:
> > Chalo wrote: > > > > Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. At the > > first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. Better yet, > > don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an > > affinity for an inadvisable machine. Save yourself and several other > > people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing > > of it. > > A good French bike with the best French parts will have plenty of time > to ingratiate itself. My old Peugeot mountain bike, from the top of > their range in the late 80s, early 90s, If I understand correctly, Peugeots had gotten with the program by the time MTBs were the dominant bikes on the scene. If that's true, then there is nothing wrong with a Peugeot MTB versus another sort of MTB from the same time period. Same with Raleighs; they gave up using proprietary thread standards by sometime in the '80s, and after that their main problems were aesthetic. French origin is never a problem per se; it's the French thread system that French manufacturers insisted on using long after it constituted a disservice to themselves and their customers. All the "wonderful" French road bikes of the bike boom years were thus afflicted. And if some misguided parts manufacturer had seen fit to make French-threaded parts all this time, the French thread folly would have been nothing more than a source of confusion. That didn't happen, though. French- threaded headsets, BBs, freewheel hubs, pedals, etc., are all unavailable historical curiosities that render their respective bikes practically unmaintainable-- $120 bearing cups for $400 cranks notwithstanding. The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at a reasonable cost. Chalo |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 13, 9:17*am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > a reasonable cost. > I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel size. For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the US is pushing the 650B Bleriots and supplies all the needed wheel goodies like tires, rims and complete wheels. Further, other distributors are getting into the act. Moreover, Kirk Pacenti is getting companies like Soma, Velo Orange, and I believe Surly, into the new "27.5 mtb tire" movement. For many of the "believers," 650b is the new black! |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
bfd wrote:
> > For many of the "believers," 650b is the new black! Rivendell is the new Fwench! Chalo |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 13, 5:17*pm, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andre Jute wrote: > > > Chalo wrote: > > > > Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. *At the > > > first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. *Better yet, > > > don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an > > > affinity for an inadvisable machine. *Save yourself and several other > > > people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing > > > of it. > > > A good French bike with the best French parts will have plenty of time > > to ingratiate itself. My old Peugeot mountain bike, from the top of > > their range in the late 80s, early 90s, > > If I understand correctly, Peugeots had gotten with the program by the > time MTBs were the dominant bikes on the scene. *If that's true, then > there is nothing wrong with a Peugeot MTB versus another sort of MTB > from the same time period. * That may or may not be so. The one I'm talking about had Sachs-Huret components, and the first major difficulty arose when the oval chainring couldn't be replaced. When the only available bottom bracket was visibly a cheap piece of rubbish, and didn't last, I gave up on it. Admittedly, in between the rear axle exploded and the sprocket set just folded up, and the LBS was apologizing before he even showed me replacement parts, "I know you'll call this names, Andre, but it's what I can get." That's what made me conclude the threading was weird. This was before I discovered Sheldon's site and read that there was, just like in cars, more than one thread. It was the experience of that Peugeot which interested me in bike mechanics, which led me to Sheldon and eventually to my love of comfort bikes with internal gear hubs. Andre Jute http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/...%20CYCLING.html |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>> Chalo wrote:
>>> Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. At the >>> first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. Better yet, >>> don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an >>> affinity for an inadvisable machine. Save yourself and several other >>> people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing >>> of it. > Andre Jute wrote: >> A good French bike with the best French parts will have plenty of time >> to ingratiate itself. My old Peugeot mountain bike, from the top of >> their range in the late 80s, early 90s, Chalo wrote: > If I understand correctly, Peugeots had gotten with the program by the > time MTBs were the dominant bikes on the scene. If that's true, then > there is nothing wrong with a Peugeot MTB versus another sort of MTB > from the same time period. Same with Raleighs; they gave up using > proprietary thread standards by sometime in the '80s, and after that > their main problems were aesthetic. > > French origin is never a problem per se; it's the French thread system > that French manufacturers insisted on using long after it constituted > a disservice to themselves and their customers. All the "wonderful" > French road bikes of the bike boom years were thus afflicted. And if > some misguided parts manufacturer had seen fit to make French-threaded > parts all this time, the French thread folly would have been nothing > more than a source of confusion. That didn't happen, though. French- > threaded headsets, BBs, freewheel hubs, pedals, etc., are all > unavailable historical curiosities that render their respective bikes > practically unmaintainable-- $120 bearing cups for $400 cranks > notwithstanding. > > The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > a reasonable cost. Good summary. Several European brands sold regular Asian bikes, rebadged, both road and MTB models, in various years for the US market. Raleigh's Nottingham bikes were 26tpi right to the bitter end. By that time [1985], the US models built at Nottingham were down to pretty much only Sports and DL-1 Roadsters[1], other bicycles being mostly Taiwan ROC by then. [1] Team Pro, Pro and Comp were built at the Carlton shop, not Nottingham -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 13, 1:11 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote: > > > Chalo wrote: > > > > Hank wrote: > > > > > bfd wrote: > > > > > > Don't know much about Zipp bearings, but if you want the ultimate in > > > > > external bearing bbs, check out the new Phil Wood: > > > > > >http://www.philwood.com/BB-Outboard%20Set.htm > > > > > Holy spit, you can get 'em in French! > > > > Isn't that a bit like getting a saddle for an epileptic horse? Sooner > > > or later there will be other issues. > > > As the old tale about delaying disaster goes, "maybe the horse will > > sing!" > > > I don't think there's anything wrong with throwing down for a new BB for > > an old frame. > > It's not oldness that is the source of the problem, it's Fwenchness. > You can lay down a bundle for a BB, cranks, and pedals to make that > smelly, leg-humping little dog learn a new trick or two, but the next > thing you know it will want a headset, which will then make you find a > new fork. Then it will be a seatpost in 23.7mm or whatever ungodly > obsolete size, and then-- joy of joys-- the freewheel turns out to be > Fwench (and worn out). > > Pretty soon you've spent a small fortune, more than enough to get a > real bike. But it's still a peculiar, smelly, leg-humping little dog > that probably has more bad surprises in store. > > Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. At the > first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. Better yet, > don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an > affinity for an inadvisable machine. Save yourself and several other > people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing > of it. > > Chalo Oh, no argument there...95% of the value in my PX-10 (updated with a full Campy Centaur group, aside from the PW BB) is sentimental, since I've had the thing since I was 13 (I turn 35 next month). For so many years, I built up in my head what a great bike it was, I was kind of taken aback when I tried out bikes with, well, BETTER geometry than the parallel 74s of my PX-10. I don't see myself ever getting rid of it, but if something happened to it, I'd happily replace it with a Mercian King of Mercia to fill my "lugged Reynolds classy European bike with room for fenders & 28mm tires" slot. |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<3c702d11-6d01-4ddf-9c39-5a03341d70e0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, Chalo <chalo.colina@gmail.com> wrote: > Ryan Cousineau wrote: > > > > Chalo wrote: > > > > > > Hank wrote: > > > > > > > > bfd wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Don't know much about Zipp bearings, but if you want the ultimate in > > > > > external bearing bbs, check out the new Phil Wood: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.philwood.com/BB-Outboard%20Set.htm > > > > > > > > Holy spit, you can get 'em in French! > > > > > > Isn't that a bit like getting a saddle for an epileptic horse? Sooner > > > or later there will be other issues. > > > > As the old tale about delaying disaster goes, "maybe the horse will > > sing!" > > > > I don't think there's anything wrong with throwing down for a new BB for > > an old frame. > > It's not oldness that is the source of the problem, it's Fwenchness. > You can lay down a bundle for a BB, cranks, and pedals to make that > smelly, leg-humping little dog learn a new trick or two, but the next > thing you know it will want a headset, which will then make you find a > new fork. Then it will be a seatpost in 23.7mm or whatever ungodly > obsolete size, and then-- joy of joys-- the freewheel turns out to be > Fwench (and worn out). In fairness to France, the Internet has made it a lot easer. To sum up: YST universal BB, $20. Headset: ISO 1". Fork: recycle off of whatever similar-vintage non-French bike you can lay your hands on. Lather, rinse, repeat. > Pretty soon you've spent a small fortune, more than enough to get a > real bike. But it's still a peculiar, smelly, leg-humping little dog > that probably has more bad surprises in store. > > Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. At the > first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. Better yet, > don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an > affinity for an inadvisable machine. Save yourself and several other > people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing > of it. Can't do that. I have already sold off a Peugeot, a Raleigh, and a Motobecane (might have even had Swiss threads) in the last few weeks. All the frames (along with an Ascente Prolite with triple-fade paint) sold for cash and parts (new 165mm MTB cranks, woot!) which I will either put on my bike, put in my pile, or turn into beer. I turned French and English bikes into beer and MTB parts! You hear that, Chalo? I am an alchemist of the awesome! -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 13, 12:32 pm, bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 9:17 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > > a reasonable cost. > > I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel > size. For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the > US is pushing the 650B Bleriots Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 13, 8:17*pm, Ozark Bicycle
<bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: > On May 13, 12:32 pm, bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On May 13, 9:17 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > > > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > > > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > > > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > > > a reasonable cost. > > > I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel > > size. *For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the > > US is pushing the 650B Bleriots > > Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an > appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be > joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- > folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes > and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all > that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). > > For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) I wouldn't be so smug, 650B is not dead yet! With the weak US dollar, Rivendell appears to be consolidating its lineup and will be offering 650B on its next batch of small AHH (58cm and smaller), mixtes - yes, those are still alive!, and on the highly anticipated Bombadil MTB. Further, as I stated above, Soma is getting into 650B and plans to have a frameset, and associated wheels/rims/tires out soon. Moreover, Kirk Pacenti has come out with an entire line of mtb components, including shock forks, tire and complete wheelset, for the new 27.5" wheel: http://www.bikelugs.com/store/index.php?intCategoryID=3 This may be what is needed to make 650B mainstream! Stay tune.... |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<679f0f6f-b3ca-4253-8c7d-639365f73bf6@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, bfd <bfd853@yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 13, 8:17*pm, Ozark Bicycle > <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: > > On May 13, 12:32 pm, bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 13, 9:17 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > > > > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > > > > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > > > > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > > > > a reasonable cost. > > > > > I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel > > > size. *For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the > > > US is pushing the 650B Bleriots > > > > Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an > > appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be > > joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- > > folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes > > and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all > > that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). > > > > For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) > > I wouldn't be so smug, 650B is not dead yet! With the weak US dollar, > Rivendell appears to be consolidating its lineup and will be offering > 650B on its next batch of small AHH (58cm and smaller), mixtes - yes, > those are still alive!, and on the highly anticipated Bombadil MTB. > Further, as I stated above, Soma is getting into 650B and plans to > have a frameset, and associated wheels/rims/tires out soon. Moreover, > Kirk Pacenti has come out with an entire line of mtb components, > including shock forks, tire and complete wheelset, for the new 27.5" > wheel: I would consider a R. bicycle but for this. In the frame size for me they insist on putting small wheels instead of wheels for grown-ups. Sure, 584 with fat tires is _almost_ as big as 622. Now put 32mm tires on 622 and we have a bigger wheel again. Bigger wheels really are better. -- Michael Press |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 14, 1:55 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article > <679f0f6f-b3ca-4253-8c7d-639365f73...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On May 13, 8:17 pm, Ozark Bicycle > > <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: > > > On May 13, 12:32 pm, bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 13, 9:17 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > > > > > looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > > > > > the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > > > > > their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > > > > > a reasonable cost. > > > > > I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel > > > > size. For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the > > > > US is pushing the 650B Bleriots > > > > Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an > > > appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be > > > joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- > > > folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes > > > and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all > > > that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). > > > > For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) > > > I wouldn't be so smug, 650B is not dead yet! With the weak US dollar, > > Rivendell appears to be consolidating its lineup and will be offering > > 650B on its next batch of small AHH (58cm and smaller), mixtes - yes, > > those are still alive!, and on the highly anticipated Bombadil MTB. > > Further, as I stated above, Soma is getting into 650B and plans to > > have a frameset, and associated wheels/rims/tires out soon. Moreover, > > Kirk Pacenti has come out with an entire line of mtb components, > > including shock forks, tire and complete wheelset, for the new 27.5" > > wheel: > > I would consider a R. bicycle but for this. In the frame size > for me they insist on putting small wheels instead of wheels > for grown-ups. Sure, 584 with fat tires is _almost_ as big > as 622. Now put 32mm tires on 622 and we have a bigger wheel again. > Bigger wheels really are better. > See my slightly tongue in cheek "Paselagasm" thread. That's 32 on 622.--and you're right, it's better than just about anything. But that's not the point. It's a Schick and Gillette sorta deal. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>>>> Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell >>>>> looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in >>>>> the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that >>>>> their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at >>>>> a reasonable cost. >>> bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel >>>> size. For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the >>>> US is pushing the 650B Bleriots >> Ozark Bicycle <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: >>> Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an >>> appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be >>> joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- >>> folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes >>> and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all >>> that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). >>> For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) > bfd <bfd853@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I wouldn't be so smug, 650B is not dead yet! With the weak US dollar, >> Rivendell appears to be consolidating its lineup and will be offering >> 650B on its next batch of small AHH (58cm and smaller), mixtes - yes, >> those are still alive!, and on the highly anticipated Bombadil MTB. >> Further, as I stated above, Soma is getting into 650B and plans to >> have a frameset, and associated wheels/rims/tires out soon. Moreover, >> Kirk Pacenti has come out with an entire line of mtb components, >> including shock forks, tire and complete wheelset, for the new 27.5" >> wheel: Michael Press wrote: > I would consider a R. bicycle but for this. In the frame size > for me they insist on putting small wheels instead of wheels > for grown-ups. Sure, 584 with fat tires is _almost_ as big > as 622. Now put 32mm tires on 622 and we have a bigger wheel again. > Bigger wheels really are better. Huh. Our customer thought "650-B" was just an optional 'serving suggestion' : http://www.yellowjersey.org/kmdg.html -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 14, 11:55*am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> I would consider a R. bicycle but for this. In the frame size > for me they insist on putting small wheels instead of wheels > for grown-ups. Sure, 584 with fat tires is _almost_ as big > as 622. Now put 32mm tires on 622 and we have a bigger wheel again. > Bigger wheels really are better. > > -- OK, with this logic, then the new upcoming Bombadil MTB should be alot better than the current offering as its 584mm wheel, that can use tires like the Pacenti Neo-Moto 650bx2.3, is bigger and should be better than any 26" (559mm) mtb in existence! |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > Chalo wrote: > > > > Life is too short to suffer Fwench bikes or 26 tpi Raleighs. At the > > first appearance of trouble, they should be recycled. Better yet, > > don't even wait for the first trouble to appear and risk developing an > > affinity for an inadvisable machine. Save yourself and several other > > people a whole lot of trouble and cut the bastard up before disposing > > of it. > > Can't do that. I have already sold off a Peugeot, a Raleigh, and a > Motobecane (might have even had Swiss threads) in the last few weeks. > All the frames (along with an Ascente Prolite with triple-fade paint) > sold for cash and parts (new 165mm MTB cranks, woot!) which I will > either put on my bike, put in my pile, or turn into beer. > > I turned French and English bikes into beer and MTB parts! You hear > that,Chalo? I am an alchemist of the awesome! Rad! Now if you can find an old Lambert and turn it into weed, then you will have completed the Three Great Quests that qualify you as a Venerable Wizard in the Fraternal Order of Single-Speed MTB Racers. Chalo |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 14, 12:14*pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> >>>> *Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> The revival of the obsolete French 650B tire and rim size by Rivendell > >>>>> looks particularly foolish to those of us who worked in bike shops in > >>>>> the '80s and '90s and had to break the sorry news to customers that > >>>>> their otherwise perfectly decent bikes couldn't get routine repairs at > >>>>> a reasonable cost. > >>> *bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> I disagree, its not only Rivendell pushing the 650B (584mm) wheel > >>>> size. *For example, QBP, arguably the largest parts distributor in the > >>>> US is pushing the 650B Bleriots > >> Ozark Bicycle <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: > >>> Apparently, the Bleriot (a joint venture between Riv and QBP) has an > >>> appointment with the guillotine in the next few months. It will be > >>> joined in hades by the "650B only" Saluki, it's over-priced brother-in- > >>> folly. In the future, the Homer-thingy will be 700C in larger sizes > >>> and 650B in smaller sizes (at least until the hobbits work off all > >>> that unsaleable 650B rim and tire inventory). > >>> For once, Barnum was wrong!! :-) > > *bfd <bfd...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I wouldn't be so smug, 650B is not dead yet! *With the weak US dollar, > >> Rivendell appears to be consolidating its lineup and will be offering > >> 650B on its next batch of small AHH (58cm and smaller), mixtes - yes, > >> those are still alive!, and on the highly anticipated Bombadil MTB. > >> Further, as I stated above, Soma is getting into 650B and plans to > >> have a frameset, and associated wheels/rims/tires out soon. Moreover, > >> Kirk Pacenti has come out with an entire line of mtb components, > >> including shock forks, tire and complete wheelset, for the new 27.5" > >> wheel: > Michael Press wrote: > > I would consider a R. bicycle but for this. In the frame size > > for me they insist on putting small wheels instead of wheels > > for grown-ups. Sure, 584 with fat tires is _almost_ as big > > as 622. Now put 32mm tires on 622 and we have a bigger wheel again. > > Bigger wheels really are better. > > Huh. Our customer thought "650-B" was just an optional 'serving > suggestion' : > > http://www.yellowjersey.org/kmdg.html > -- > Andrew Muzi > * <www.yellowjersey.org/> > * Open every day since 1 April, 1971 > ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Interesting. Did you spec'd it with 700c (622mm) wheels? It doesn't look like there's alot of clearance for a front fender. On a side note, I've seen exactly two riding around in the SF Bay Area. Both were older folks just cruizin' around. Seems very expensive (they cost what, about $2500-3500 to build up!) for a cruizer.... |
|