Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > General Mountain Bike Chat > alt.mountain-bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--No Surprise,Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-06.-2008, 04:48 PM   #91
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>
> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
> >> >> >> >occasions

>
> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>
> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
> >> >> >option.

>
> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>
> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
> >> >stuff you just made up.

>
> >> Whatever.

>
> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>
> It's okay.


Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

E.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06.-2008, 02:40 AM   #92
Mike Vandeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--No Surprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:

>On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>>
>>
>> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
>> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>>
>> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
>> >> >> >> >occasions

>>
>> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
>> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>>
>> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
>> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
>> >> >> >option.

>>
>> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>>
>> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
>> >> >stuff you just made up.

>>
>> >> Whatever.

>>
>> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
>> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
>> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>>
>> It's okay.

>
>Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
>that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
>fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.


YOU are the liar. Everything I said is true, and EASILY VERIFIABLE by
anyone who cares to check, which obviously doesn't include you.

>E.P.

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06.-2008, 06:34 AM   #93
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>
> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>
> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>
> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
> >> >> >> >option.

>
> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>
> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>
> >> >> Whatever.

>
> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>
> >> It's okay.

>
> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>
> Everything I said is true...


A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those
authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
real truth - that you just plain made it up.

E.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06.-2008, 11:52 PM   #94
Mike Vandeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--No Surprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>>
>>
>> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
>> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
>> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>>
>> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
>> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>>
>> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
>> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
>> >> >> >> >option.

>>
>> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>>
>> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
>> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>>
>> >> >> Whatever.

>>
>> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
>> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
>> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>>
>> >> It's okay.

>>
>> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
>> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
>> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>>
>> Everything I said is true...

>
>A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those
>authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
>discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
>real truth - that you just plain made it up.


Thanks for demonstrating that mountain bikers don't care about the
truth. You should do your own research, so you don't have to look like
the fool you are.

>E.P.

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2008, 02:51 AM   #95
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Jun 2, 7:52*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
>
>
> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? *Or "real" as inactual
> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>
> >> >> >> >> >> *The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>
> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether ornot they
> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, *I guess you took the "make it up"
> >> >> >> >> >option.

>
> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>
> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>
> >> >> >> Whatever.

>
> >> >> >Exactly. *More stuff you just made up. *I knew you'd never be able to
> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. *You are truly LOL funny.

>
> >> >> It's okay.

>
> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? *It's not OK. *The "fact"
> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
> >> >fabricated. *Lying is wrong, Mike. *You should be ashamed of yourself.

>
> >> Everything I said is true...

>
> >A claim for which you provide no proof. *Prove that even one of those
> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
> >discussion. *Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
> >real truth - that you just plain made it up.

>
> You should do your own research...


I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even
a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of
any kind.

Remember, we're talking about the actual researchers, not the guy that
did the review article.

Which is why I used that term originally.

So prove it, Mike. Prove that any of those researchers owns a bike.

Or make something else up, or change the subject. Like you always do
when someone smarter than you calls you on your BS.

E.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2008, 11:36 PM   #96
Mike Vandeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--No Surprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 2, 7:52*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? *Or "real" as in actual
>> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
>> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> *The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
>> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
>> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, *I guess you took the "make it up"
>> >> >> >> >> >option.

>>
>> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>>
>> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
>> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>>
>> >> >> >> Whatever.

>>
>> >> >> >Exactly. *More stuff you just made up. *I knew you'd never be able to
>> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
>> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. *You are truly LOL funny.

>>
>> >> >> It's okay.

>>
>> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? *It's not OK. *The "fact"
>> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
>> >> >fabricated. *Lying is wrong, Mike. *You should be ashamed of yourself.

>>
>> >> Everything I said is true...

>>
>> >A claim for which you provide no proof. *Prove that even one of those
>> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
>> >discussion. *Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
>> >real truth - that you just plain made it up.

>>
>> You should do your own research...

>
>I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even
>a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of
>any kind.


But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them
themselves. AND DID YOU? OF COURSE NOT, because you don't really waht
the truth.

>Remember, we're talking about the actual researchers, not the guy that
>did the review article.
>
>Which is why I used that term originally.
>
>So prove it, Mike. Prove that any of those researchers owns a bike.
>
>Or make something else up, or change the subject. Like you always do
>when someone smarter than you calls you on your BS.


But not smart enough to send an email?

>E.P.

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06.-2008, 08:55 AM   #97
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
> >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
> >> >> >> >> >> >option.

>
> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>
> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
> >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>
> >> >> >> >> Whatever.

>
> >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
> >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
> >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>
> >> >> >> It's okay.

>
> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
> >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
> >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>
> >> >> Everything I said is true...

>
> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those
> >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
> >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
> >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up.

>
> >> You should do your own research...

>
> >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even
> >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of
> >any kind.

>
> But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them
> themselves. AND DID YOU?


Yes, I did.

Not one of them replied in the affirmative.

Checking up on your fabrications is trivial, Mike. Why bother making
stuff up that's so easily refuted?

E.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06.-2008, 01:52 PM   #98
Mike Vandeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--No Surprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>>
>>
>>
>> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
>> >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >option.

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
>> >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>>
>> >> >> >> >> Whatever.

>>
>> >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
>> >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
>> >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>>
>> >> >> >> It's okay.

>>
>> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
>> >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
>> >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>>
>> >> >> Everything I said is true...

>>
>> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those
>> >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
>> >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
>> >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up.

>>
>> >> You should do your own research...

>>
>> >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even
>> >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of
>> >any kind.

>>
>> But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them
>> themselves. AND DID YOU?

>
>Yes, I did.
>
>Not one of them replied in the affirmative.


Now they aren't even being honest! I ugess they are gun-shy from
having their bad "research" exposed. Did you expect a mountain biker
to be HONEST?!!!

>Checking up on your fabrications is trivial, Mike. Why bother making
>stuff up that's so easily refuted?
>
>E.P.

--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06.-2008, 01:20 PM   #99
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On May 29, 6:44 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:45:45 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
> >The evidence has already been provided.

>
> BS. Unless you can provide some real evidence, you are just LYING
> again.


The part you trimmed addresses that.

E.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06.-2008, 01:23 PM   #100
Ed Pirrero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Comparing relative impacts of various trail user groups--NoSurprise, Hikers and Equestrians Cause More Trail Damage than Mountain Bikers

On Jun 3, 9:52 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
>
>
>
> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research?

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful.

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >option.

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH!

>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of
> >> >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up.

>
> >> >> >> >> >> Whatever.

>
> >> >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to
> >> >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because
> >> >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny.

>
> >> >> >> >> It's okay.

>
> >> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact"
> >> >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up,
> >> >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>
> >> >> >> Everything I said is true...

>
> >> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those
> >> >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the
> >> >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the
> >> >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up.

>
> >> >> You should do your own research...

>
> >> >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even
> >> >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of
> >> >any kind.

>
> >> But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them
> >> themselves. AND DID YOU?

>
> >Yes, I did.

>
> >Not one of them replied in the affirmative.

>
> Now they aren't even being honest!


By what standard? Your imaginary conspiracy of MTBers flooding the
peer-reviewed literature with pro-MTB propaganda?

LOL.

The word "logic" and "Vandeman" should never appear in the same
newsgroup together.

E.P.
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com