![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy either. Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could get good images. Tim. -- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light. http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tim Woodall" <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote in message news:slrng3mfe3.74k.devnull@dirac.home.woodall.me.uk... > Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > It could be false...... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tim Woodall" <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote in message news:slrng3mfe3.74k.devnull@dirac.home.woodall.me.uk... > Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > > http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in > https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy > either. > An alternative interpretations is that they consider it too much bother.... |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tim Woodall wrote: > Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > > http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door. > I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in > https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy > either. > > Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon > Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive > - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive > although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could > get good images. There are a couple of people using YouTube that have better cameras, but I don't know what they are. I don't think using the camera in the rain helps, there is a large loss of clarity, and I don't know much an improved camera would help. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tim Woodall wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > > http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in > https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy > either. BV02 OCM - the first one I tried! Matt |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > > http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in > https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy > either. > > Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon > Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive > - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive > although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could > get good images. > Ask in sci.astro.amateur; they do a lot of image stacking and enhancement. You might see if the Mobibox does a better job; a bit pricy, but very small & light, and 640x480x30fps, max 2gb sd card. What did BV02 OCM do that attracted your attention? |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh
<matthaighNews07@local.gcrsoft.com> wrote: >Tim Woodall wrote: >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >> >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ >> >> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in >> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy >> either. > >BV02 OCM - the first one I tried! > >Matt Certainly looks like that. mycarcheck says it's a 5 door though, can't see rear door handle. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Grange <peter@plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Certainly looks like that. mycarcheck says it's a 5 door though, can't >see rear door handle. That model has concealed handles on the rear door. -- Fr. Jack The ex(un)civil servant |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote:
> Tim Woodall wrote: >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >> >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ >> >> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in >> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any >> joy either. > > BV02 OCM - the first one I tried! Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/ "We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento Sx (3 Door Hatchback)." HTH Noel |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Martin" <martin.dann@virgin.net> wrote in message news:loH_j.13987$%B6.2118@newsfe13.ams2... > > Tim Woodall wrote: >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >> >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark > Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door. Alfa do a good job of hiding the fact that their 5 doors have 5 doors. See this pic: http://blog.drecom.jp/sillymgm/img/...ack_suv_800.jpg The door handle for the back doors is at the back of the window. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-05-26, Martin <martin.dann@virgin.net> wrote:
> > Tim Woodall wrote: >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >> >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark > Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door. In other frames that V looks like a W, also in some a Y. I think the W is clearer. The M is very hard to read. Reminds me of eye tests! - Richard -- _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at gmail dot com _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ Time is a one way street, _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ except in the Twilight Zone |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Noel wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote: > > > Tim Woodall wrote: > >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > >> > >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > >> > >> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in > >> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have > any >> joy either. > > > > BV02 OCM - the first one I tried! > > > Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/ > > "We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento > Sx (3 Door Hatchback)." The Alfa badge is a bit of a giveaway that it isn't a Fiat ... -- Paul - xxx '96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi 'Big and Butch' Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp "When I feel fit enough' |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Noel" <2007@take.this.bit.off.lolith.net> wrote in message news:1FN_j.68027$UP6.67172@newsfe14.ams2... > On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote: > >> Tim Woodall wrote: >>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >>> >>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ >>> >>> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in >>> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any >>> joy either. >> >> BV02 OCM - the first one I tried! > > > Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/ > > "We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento Sx > (3 Door Hatchback)." > > HTH > Noel > > Vehicle Check for BV02OCM We have further important information about BV02OCM, a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). That's what I get. Jim |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
_ wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall wrote: > > >>Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: >> >>http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ >> >>I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in >>https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy >>either. >> >>Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon >>Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive >>- but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive >>although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could >>get good images. >> > > Ask in sci.astro.amateur; they do a lot of image stacking and enhancement. > > You might see if the Mobibox does a better job; a bit pricy, but very small > & light, and 640x480x30fps, max 2gb sd card. > > What did BV02 OCM do that attracted your attention? Umm... I've made a jpeg of the average of the best four images and make it BV02 DCM, anyone tried that? Roger Thorpe |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 26, 11:46 pm, Tim Woodall <devn...@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be: > > http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/ > > I've tried everything I think it could possibly be inhttps://www.mycarcheck.com/with no luck. The police didn't have any joy > either. > > Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon > Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive > - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive > although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could > get good images. > Thank you everybody. The passenger in the car tried to push me off my bike yesterday morning. I'd hoped the camera would have caught him leaning out of the window but its field of view isn't wide enough. Given the weather yesterday, you wouldn't expect cars to be driving around with their window wide open. The car passed a little close but nothing exceptionally unusual. I could tell hear was a bit close before he passed me but I didn't know exactly how close. Because I didn't know exactly how close I deliberately rode over a sunken (wet) manhole cover rather than go around it. If I had gone around it instead (as I would have preferred) then I'd have been 15-20cm closer when the passenger touched me (I can't really say hit me because I think I was on the limits of his reach) and given the conditions yesterday (the roads were very slippery) things could have turned out much worse. I've had things shouted at me, I've even been hit by the wing mirror of a passing car, but never before have I had anything like this happen. On one occasion I actually had the passenger shy away from me as the car passed too close - the car window was open and I heard the passenger say to the driver "that was close" (it was!). Tim. |
|