Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Can you work out this numberplate?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-05.-2008, 07:46 AM   #1
Tim Woodall
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can you work out this numberplate?

Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:

http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/

I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
either.

Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon
Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive
- but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive
although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could
get good images.

Tim.


--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and there was light.

http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 07:57 AM   #2
vernon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?


"Tim Woodall" <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote in message
news:slrng3mfe3.74k.devnull@dirac.home.woodall.me.uk...
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>

It could be false......


  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 07:59 AM   #3
vernon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?


"Tim Woodall" <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote in message
news:slrng3mfe3.74k.devnull@dirac.home.woodall.me.uk...
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>
> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>
> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
> either.
>

An alternative interpretations is that they consider it too much bother....


  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 08:06 AM   #4
Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?


Tim Woodall wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>
> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/


Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark
Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door.

> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
> either.
>
> Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon
> Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive
> - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive
> although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could
> get good images.


There are a couple of people using YouTube that have better cameras, but
I don't know what they are.
I don't think using the camera in the rain helps, there is a large loss
of clarity, and I don't know much an improved camera would help.

  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 08:07 AM   #5
Matthew Haigh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

Tim Woodall wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>
> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>
> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
> either.


BV02 OCM - the first one I tried!

Matt
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 08:19 AM   #6
_
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall wrote:

> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>
> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>
> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
> either.
>
> Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon
> Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive
> - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive
> although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could
> get good images.
>

Ask in sci.astro.amateur; they do a lot of image stacking and enhancement.

You might see if the Mobibox does a better job; a bit pricy, but very small
& light, and 640x480x30fps, max 2gb sd card.

What did BV02 OCM do that attracted your attention?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 08:21 AM   #7
Peter Grange
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh
<matthaighNews07@local.gcrsoft.com> wrote:

>Tim Woodall wrote:
>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>
>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>>
>> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
>> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
>> either.

>
>BV02 OCM - the first one I tried!
>
>Matt

Certainly looks like that. mycarcheck says it's a 5 door though, can't
see rear door handle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 08:46 AM   #8
Fr Jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

Peter Grange <peter@plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote:


>Certainly looks like that. mycarcheck says it's a 5 door though, can't
>see rear door handle.


That model has concealed handles on the rear door.
--

Fr. Jack

The ex(un)civil servant
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 03:14 PM   #9
Noel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote:

> Tim Woodall wrote:
>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>
>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>>
>> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
>> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any
>> joy either.

>
> BV02 OCM - the first one I tried!



Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/

"We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento Sx
(3 Door Hatchback)."

HTH
Noel


  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 03:42 PM   #10
Doki
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?


"Martin" <martin.dann@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:loH_j.13987$%B6.2118@newsfe13.ams2...
>
> Tim Woodall wrote:
>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>
>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/

>
> Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark
> Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door.


Alfa do a good job of hiding the fact that their 5 doors have 5 doors.

See this pic:

http://blog.drecom.jp/sillymgm/img/...ack_suv_800.jpg

The door handle for the back doors is at the back of the window.

  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 03:47 PM   #11
Richard Corfield
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

On 2008-05-26, Martin <martin.dann@virgin.net> wrote:
>
> Tim Woodall wrote:
>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>
>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/

>
> Looks to me like BV02 OCM, which translates to a Alfa Romeo 147 T Spark
> Lusso (5 Door Hatchback). However the car in the picy looks like a 3 door.


In other frames that V looks like a W, also in some a Y. I think the W
is clearer. The M is very hard to read.

Reminds me of eye tests!

- Richard

--
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at gmail dot com
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ Time is a one way street,
_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ except in the Twilight Zone
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 03:57 PM   #12
Paul - xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

Noel wrote:

> On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote:
>
> > Tim Woodall wrote:
> >> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
> >>
> >> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
> >>
> >> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
> >> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have

> any >> joy either.
> >
> > BV02 OCM - the first one I tried!

>
>
> Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/
>
> "We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento
> Sx (3 Door Hatchback)."


The Alfa badge is a bit of a giveaway that it isn't a Fiat ...

--
Paul - xxx

'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi 'Big and Butch'
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp "When I feel fit enough'
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 05:33 PM   #13
Jhimmy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?


"Noel" <2007@take.this.bit.off.lolith.net> wrote in message
news:1FN_j.68027$UP6.67172@newsfe14.ams2...
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:07:50 +0100, Matthew Haigh wrote:
>
>> Tim Woodall wrote:
>>> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>>
>>> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>>>
>>> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
>>> https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any
>>> joy either.

>>
>> BV02 OCM - the first one I tried!

>
>
> Isn't it this one?: https://www.mycarcheck.com/check/BV02OCW/
>
> "We have further important information about BV02OCW, a Fiat Seicento Sx
> (3 Door Hatchback)."
>
> HTH
> Noel
>
>


Vehicle Check for BV02OCM

We have further important information about BV02OCM, a Alfa Romeo 147 T
Spark Lusso (5 Door Hatchback).

That's what I get.

Jim

  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 06:23 PM   #14
Roger Thorpe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

_ wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall wrote:
>
>
>>Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>>
>>http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>>
>>I've tried everything I think it could possibly be in
>>https://www.mycarcheck.com/ with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
>>either.
>>
>>Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon
>>Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive
>>- but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive
>>although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could
>>get good images.
>>

>
> Ask in sci.astro.amateur; they do a lot of image stacking and enhancement.
>
> You might see if the Mobibox does a better job; a bit pricy, but very small
> & light, and 640x480x30fps, max 2gb sd card.
>
> What did BV02 OCM do that attracted your attention?

Umm... I've made a jpeg of the average of the best four images and make
it BV02 DCM, anyone tried that?
Roger Thorpe
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-05.-2008, 06:58 PM   #15
google@woodall.me.uk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Can you work out this numberplate?

On May 26, 11:46 pm, Tim Woodall <devn...@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
> Anybody any ideas what this numberplate could be:
>
> http://www.woodall.me.uk/car/
>
> I've tried everything I think it could possibly be inhttps://www.mycarcheck.com/with no luck. The police didn't have any joy
> either.
>
> Anyone any suggestions for a better camera than this one - the Oregon
> Scientific ATC2K? The real problem is that the jpeging is too aggressive
> - but I suspect the SD card won't be fast enough if it's less aggressive
> although a frame rate of 15 frames per second would be ok if you could
> get good images.
>


Thank you everybody.

The passenger in the car tried to push me off my bike yesterday
morning. I'd hoped the camera would have caught him leaning out of the
window but its field of view isn't wide enough.

Given the weather yesterday, you wouldn't expect cars to be driving
around with their window wide open.

The car passed a little close but nothing exceptionally unusual. I
could tell hear was a bit close before he passed me but I didn't know
exactly how close. Because I didn't know exactly how close I
deliberately rode over a sunken (wet) manhole cover rather than go
around it. If I had gone around it instead (as I would have preferred)
then I'd have been 15-20cm closer when the passenger touched me (I
can't really say hit me because I think I was on the limits of his
reach) and given the conditions yesterday (the roads were very
slippery) things could have turned out much worse.

I've had things shouted at me, I've even been hit by the wing mirror
of a passing car, but never before have I had anything like this
happen. On one occasion I actually had the passenger shy away from me
as the car passed too close - the car window was open and I heard the
passenger say to the driver "that was close" (it was!).

Tim.
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com