![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<carlfogel@comcast.net> wrote in message news:m4h0445p2g6t4722gj1kidasnoe00at039@4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 May 2008 05:22:54 -0700 (PDT), "Qui si parla > Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com" <peter@vecchios.com> wrote: > > >On May 28, 10:38 pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote: > >> >> "* * Chas" <verktygj...@aol.spamski.com> wrote: > >> >>> I picked up a Campy Croce D'Aune gruppo last week. The date code on the > >> >>> crank arms is 41 in a square. I haven't been able to find what year that > >> >>> translates to. > >> > carlfo...@comcast.net wrote: > >> >> Could the "41" be just the minimum number of teeth? > >> >> "1967: The Record crankset is changed to a 144mm bolt circle (41 tooth > >> >> minimum) from the previous 151mm bolt circle (44 tooth minimum)." > >> >> http://www.campyonly.com/history/timeline.html > >> Hank wrote: > >> > That's unlikely, since the CDA crank had a 135mm BCD, like all Campy > >> > full-sized doubles from C-Record onwards. Rings were available as > >> > small as 39t (didn't TA make a 38?). > >> > >> 38t SR-Sakae and later TA for the 130 format, never saw one for 135mm > >> > >> I never noticed any pattern to Campagnolo crank markings of the era so I > >> can't help with the OP's query. > >> -- > >> Andrew Muzi > >> <www.yellowjersey.org/> > >> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 > >> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com** > > > >I used to have a chart that talked about what it all meant. Shape was > >the month, number was the year or something. > > Dear Peter, > > It turns out to be a nightmare date code: > > "Also, the crank arms can have a code consisting of a diamond > (1970's), circle (1980's), square (late non-fluted SR), etc. with a > number in the center possibly denoting the last digit of the year of > manufacture." > http://www.campyonly.com/tipstrivia.html > > "Starting in 1973 the crank arms have a code consisting of a diamond > (1970's), circle (1980's), square (late Super Record), with a number > in the center denoting the last digit of the year of manufacture (some > exceptions:11=1985, 22=1986, 33=1987 plus others)." > http://www.velo-retro.com/tline.html > > Where "41" in a square on a Croce D'Aune crank fits in this dating > scheme is a mystery covered by "possibly" and "plus others". > > Cheers, > > Carl Fogel Carl, To add to the mystery, I have a documented 1994 C-Record crankset with 94 in a square. The CDA gruppo is on a 1985 Eddy Merckx bike almost the same as this one except for saddle, rims and color - mine is all red. http://velospace.org/node/1903 CDA from what I can tell didn't come out until 1988. I'm guessing that the frame hung in a bike shop until 1988 or later and then was assembled with the CDA gruppo. Chas. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<dustoyevsky@mac.com> wrote in message news:1a623dd4-a33a-4a35-abf5-8aa9045d968d@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com... On May 30, 1:43 pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote: > Just as I suspected, some Italian toolmaker dropped random numbers in > the dies every once and a while. It's a way of attaining a measure of short-term immortality. --D-y Back in the mid 70s were building up a pro bike frame with a full Campy NR gruppo. One of our mechanics was having problems installing the left pedal. Upon closer examination we discovered that the pedal had a double lead left hand thread. Someone had to have intentionally threaded the pedal with a double lead thread. Chas./ |
|