![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael Press wrote:
> In article <slrng4pnjh.5i0.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > >> On 2008-06-08, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote: >> [...] >>> Elastic modulus is a 2-tensor of dimension 3. >>> 9 components. >>> The diagonal components give deformation normal to >>> a coordinate plane given force applied normal to >>> the coordinate planes. >>> The six off diagonal components give shear deformation >>> for force applied parallel to coordinate planes. >>> The 9 components could all be different from each other. >> So for a lump of steel, am I right in thinking the tensor looks like >> this: >> >> E 0 0 >> 0 E 0 >> 0 0 E >> >> where E is about 200GPa. >> >> But for CF or something anisotropic, I would have different values all >> over the place. >> >> There don't seem to be any "shear components" in my matrix for steel, >> but I don't really understand that: coordinate planes are usually >> orthogonal, which means force normal to one plane is parallel to the >> other two. So I don't see how you can divide forces into two sets of >> those normal to coordinate planes and those parallel to them. > > Epoxy resin and carbon fiber lay ups have anisotropic elastic properties, > as do various crystals. > > <http://books.google.com/books?id=90_ORVHeNkIC&pg=PT237&lpg=PT237&dq=anisotropic+crystal+%22elastic+modulus%22&source=web&ots=Zg1nRkq41y&sig=39g5dHxh5jGudvEd3_N-aug5sFc&hl=en> > so? that doesn't address his question in the slightest. perhaps you shouldn't try to bullshit outside your area of expertise? ah, but i remember now, you're the guy that thinks anodizing crack orientation has no bearing on fatigue initiation! now your confusion becomes clear! |
|