Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


metallurgy question

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-06.-2008, 10:42 AM   #16
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: metallurgy question

Michael Press wrote:
> In article <slrng4pnjh.5i0.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
> Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
>
>> On 2008-06-08, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Elastic modulus is a 2-tensor of dimension 3.
>>> 9 components.
>>> The diagonal components give deformation normal to
>>> a coordinate plane given force applied normal to
>>> the coordinate planes.
>>> The six off diagonal components give shear deformation
>>> for force applied parallel to coordinate planes.
>>> The 9 components could all be different from each other.

>> So for a lump of steel, am I right in thinking the tensor looks like
>> this:
>>
>> E 0 0
>> 0 E 0
>> 0 0 E
>>
>> where E is about 200GPa.
>>
>> But for CF or something anisotropic, I would have different values all
>> over the place.
>>
>> There don't seem to be any "shear components" in my matrix for steel,
>> but I don't really understand that: coordinate planes are usually
>> orthogonal, which means force normal to one plane is parallel to the
>> other two. So I don't see how you can divide forces into two sets of
>> those normal to coordinate planes and those parallel to them.

>
> Epoxy resin and carbon fiber lay ups have anisotropic elastic properties,
> as do various crystals.
>
> <http://books.google.com/books?id=90_ORVHeNkIC&pg=PT237&lpg=PT237&dq=anisotropic+crystal+%22elastic+modulus%22&source=web&ots=Zg1nRkq41y&sig=39g5dHxh5jGudvEd3_N-aug5sFc&hl=en>
>


so? that doesn't address his question in the slightest. perhaps you
shouldn't try to bullshit outside your area of expertise?

ah, but i remember now, you're the guy that thinks anodizing crack
orientation has no bearing on fatigue initiation! now your confusion
becomes clear!

  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com