Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-06.-2008, 04:27 AM   #16
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:58:51 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar
<derderderder619@hotmail.com> said in
<e96f5a99-f4e7-4de2-bb08-05369db24214@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>:

>Perhaps because the car is
>a proper, necessary, useful form of transport that disabled people
>actually want to, and are able to, use (how many disabled cyclists do
>*you* see)?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handcycle

Thanks for the demonstration that you are a bigot, though, it chips
away still further at whatever vestigial shadow of credibility you
might ever have had. Oh, wait, you never had a shadow of
credibility. Ho hum.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 04:57 AM   #17
Terry Duckmanton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

Nuxx Bar wrote:

>
> I should think that disabled people, for whom the car is the only
> practical form of transport, get even more fed up than others at the
> constant persecution faced by motorists. They're the ones who suffer
> the most, and it shows how cold-hearted and callous the trolls who
> advocate anti-motorist measures really are. The trolls purport to
> think it's fair that a disabled person who's caught driving safely at
> 35 in a 30 four times in three years is banned. They purport to think
> that that's in the public interest. They know it isn't really, of
> course; but it is in the callous, rabid motorist-hating bastards'
> interest. Bullying disabled people with anti-motorist measures:
> they're the lowest of the low. Pure scum.


Speaking as a frequent pedestrian I feel that 30 in a 30mph zone is
often too fast. How the devil I am expected to cross the road when every
Tom, Dick and Nuxx Bar feels they have the right to file past at thirty
plus miles per hour I don't know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 07:17 AM   #18
Alan Braggins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

In article <i360545ndlaracfon5pi6m7b3mqu4bsliv@4ax.com>, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:58:51 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar
>
>>Perhaps because the car is
>>a proper, necessary, useful form of transport that disabled people
>>actually want to, and are able to, use (how many disabled cyclists do
>>*you* see)?

>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handcycle


I've also met someone who used a normal bicycle at walking pace because
it caused much less shock to her spinal injury than walking.

Not long ago I saw someone with one leg riding a Brompton. (He had
crutches strapped to it, and the pedal had a wooden block on the underside
and a toeclip so he could lift it to "ratchet" the crank, but I'm still
not sure exactly how he set off.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 07:19 AM   #19
Daniel Barlow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

Terry Duckmanton <terry@duckmanton.notthisbit.eu> writes:

> A person with faulty legs would be perfectly capable of using a hand
> powered trike. I must admit that someone with a dicky ticker would be
> less able and would be better off with a car.


At least unless the heart stops while they're driving it.


-dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 08:01 AM   #20
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

On 11 Jun 2008 22:17:23 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk
(Alan Braggins) said in
<slrng50g73.g0a.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>:

>Not long ago I saw someone with one leg riding a Brompton.


What was the other leg riding?

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 08:11 AM   #21
Guy Ballantine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

I'm not sure of why you want to discuss the differences of a disabled
cyclist or motorist and quote incorrect information. I am disabled, have a
Motability vehicle and ride a handcycle for exercise so I am a disabled
driver AND a disabled cyclist.

In your first paragraph you say that cyclists are banned from areas that a
wheelchair can go. Like where?unless you mean it being a unsafe to ride
around a small shop on you bicycle where a wheelchair would be more
manoeuvrable.

The information on Motabiliy is mostly correct, but what is wrong with
paying a small deposit when starting a lease on a car, I do it every three
years and gain a massive benefit from having 3 years costs free motoring
(not counting the ridicules price of unleaded).

Personally I love being able to drive around in my car but baulk at the high
cost of a fuel which for me, should not be considered a VAT product as it is
a necessity to get me and my wheelchair/ handcyles around to shopping and
other places that I need to go to, but I can't use my handcycle to do the
same tasks as shopping as it is not designed as a mull but a recreational
device

--
OJ
http://oliverguyjones.blogspot.com/

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
Elbert Hubbard (1856 - 1915)


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 08:17 AM   #22
Guy Ballantine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?


"Just zis Guy, you know?" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message
news:i360545ndlaracfon5pi6m7b3mqu4bsliv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:58:51 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar
> <derderderder619@hotmail.com> said in
> <e96f5a99-f4e7-4de2-bb08-05369db24214@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>Perhaps because the car is
>>a proper, necessary, useful form of transport that disabled people
>>actually want to, and are able to, use (how many disabled cyclists do
>>*you* see)?

>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handcycle
>


Ah see that you have found the a picture of my old mate, Geoff Marshall and
his Top End Gold. There are more of us out there, I have not met anyone else
riding a handcyle around London although I do get people I know saying they
have see someone here or there. I have see a Columbian guy with one leg
riding around the Finsbury Park area, that has to be fun at the lights!

--
OJ
http://oliverguyjones.blogspot.com/

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
Elbert Hubbard (1856 - 1915)


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 08:34 AM   #23
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:17:10 +0100, "Guy Ballantine"
<nospamoliver-jones@lineone.net> said in
<k_adnUu2Vc17083VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>:

>Ah see that you have found the a picture of my old mate, Geoff Marshall and
>his Top End Gold.


I uploaded it myself :-)

Are you any relation to Richard?

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 01:19 PM   #24
Rob Morley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabledmotorists?

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:11:21 +0100
"Guy Ballantine" <nospamoliver-jones@lineone.net> wrote:
>
> In your first paragraph you say that cyclists are banned from areas
> that a wheelchair can go. Like where?


Pedestrianised shopping areas.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 04:44 PM   #25
Alan Braggins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

In article <fpi0541t6sgfmivartt3130tefqcq19552@4ax.com>, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>On 11 Jun 2008 22:17:23 +0100 (BST), armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk
>(Alan Braggins) said in
><slrng50g73.g0a.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk>:
>
>>Not long ago I saw someone with one leg riding a Brompton.

>
>What was the other leg riding?


I've no idea - only the one attached to his body was in sight :-)
(See also http://xkcd.com/191/ (though it's a bit unfair).)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 04:58 PM   #26
JNugent
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

Rob Morley wrote:

> "Guy Ballantine" <nospamoliver-jones@lineone.net> wrote:


>> In your first paragraph you say that cyclists are banned from areas
>> that a wheelchair can go. Like where?


> Pedestrianised shopping areas.


True.

And the interiors of shops and supermarkets. And the end of the row in a
theatre or cinema. And railway platforms (believe it or not, but someone
recently suggested that cyclists should be allowed to cycle along the
platforms!).
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 05:13 PM   #27
Mark McNeill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

Response to Alan Braggins
> >>Not long ago I saw someone with one leg riding a Brompton.

> >
> >What was the other leg riding?

>
> I've no idea - only the one attached to his body was in sight :-)
> (See also http://xkcd.com/191/ (though it's a bit unfair).)



Going ever-so-slightly OT, hitting RANDOM got me

http://xkcd.com/346/


which made me laugh till it hurt, which is pretty good going after only
one coffee.



--
Mark, UK
"Aristotle maintained that women have fewer teeth than men; although he
was twice married, it never occurred to him to verify this statement by
examining his wives' mouths."
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 05:37 PM   #28
Dave Larrington
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

In news:slrng50g73.g0a.armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk,
Alan Braggins <armb@chiark.greenend.org.uk> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to
tell us:

> Not long ago I saw someone with one leg riding a Brompton. (He had
> crutches strapped to it, and the pedal had a wooden block on the
> underside
> and a toeclip so he could lift it to "ratchet" the crank, but I'm
> still
> not sure exactly how he set off.)


One Kevin Hickman has but one leg, yet has still managed an SR series on a
normal bike. I met him on last year's Cheddar Gorge 300, where he proved
embarrassingly faster up hills with a single leg than I could manage with
two.

--
Dave Larrington
<http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
God was my co-pilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had
to eat Him.


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 05:41 PM   #29
Dave Larrington
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

In news:k_adnUu2Vc17083VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk,
Guy Ballantine <nospamoliver-jones@lineone.net> tweaked the Babbage-Engine
to tell us:

> I do get people I know saying they
> have see someone here or there. I
> have see a Columbian guy with one leg
> riding around the Finsbury Park area,
> that has to be fun at the lights!


His name is Robinson Martinez and he turned up at a BHPC race meeting at
Eastway in 2006. He averaged 18.6 mph for just over 3/4 of an hour, which
netted him 26th place overall in a field of 55.

--
Dave Larrington
<http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
Murdock's Gardening Law: If it's green, the paving isn't
finished yet.


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06.-2008, 06:08 PM   #30
Peter Clinch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?

Dave Larrington wrote:
> In news:k_adnUu2Vc17083VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk,
> Guy Ballantine <nospamoliver-jones@lineone.net> tweaked the Babbage-Engine
> to tell us:
>
>> I do get people I know saying they
>> have see someone here or there. I
>> have see a Columbian guy with one leg
>> riding around the Finsbury Park area,
>> that has to be fun at the lights!

>
> His name is Robinson Martinez and he turned up at a BHPC race meeting at
> Eastway in 2006. He averaged 18.6 mph for just over 3/4 of an hour, which
> netted him 26th place overall in a field of 55.


Jamie Andrew lost both legs below the knee from frostbite after a
climbing trip went pear shaped. He did a charity fundraiser last year
where he did a personal triathlon of iron Man distances in under 24
hours (so a 112 mile bike ride in there, and he doesn't have any hands
any more either...)
http://www.jamieandrew.com/content/view/49/40/

He still climbs, and harder than me!

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com