![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#136 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: east coast australia
Posts: 1,366
|
Quote:
You referring to Hincapie? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
of couse, I could have misheard him, but it definitely sounded like VandeVelde said he was hoping the others crash too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
He did want the break to succeed. As long as no-one in it was a threat to Cadel Lotto would have been happy to see Popovych take the stage - would have been a good morale boost for the next stage. Of course Lotto would want Popo to save his energy but he was needed in the break away all the way to the top of the last climb. There's no point him dropping back to save energy on the descent, so he was free to go for the win. Confusedfan explained it pretty well. Popo was not needed by Cadel today. If Cadel had cracked you would have seen Popo drop back immediately. Popo has been paid a lot of money to support Cadel. Even if he hates Cadel's guts he's not going to sabotage his own career by rebelling against team orders. These guys are professionals. Seriously, what telecast are you watching and who are the commentators, because on the one I'm watching all this is being explained. Last edited by b1_ : 23-07.-2008 at 02:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
Never ever doubt me. 3 in the break including Siutsou. I know this team inside out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 1,216
|
Quote:
I guess if you say the same thing every day, it'll be right sooner or later...along the lines of , if you give 10,000 monkeys a pen & paper, sooner or later they'll write the complete works of shakespeare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
Alpe d'Huez will be different, but in the end, 3 or 4 of the contenders will end up within 2 minutes, and Cadel will win it on Saturday. Only other alternative I see is Kohl putting 3 minutes in Alpe today. He looks really strong. I'm just disappointed that Andy will probably again stay with his brother. After the Tour, experts might actually say that this brotherhood "cause" will have cost CSC the TDF win in Paris. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,738
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
The problem, Grater, is that no-one is sure if you know that there are other teams. I'll doubt you when you pick a Columbia 1-2-3 as you did for Stage 12. Quote:
It was Kohl. Straight on to his wheel. Sastre didn't even get past Andy Schleck before giving up. The others would have had to scramble, but Kohl was straight there. Evans moved up in the group after he saw the attacks might start. But there are other explanations that make sense (that is, why no attacks), eg from Riis, quoted on the SBS site: Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,833
|
Quote:
Last edited by TheDarkLord : 23-07.-2008 at 08:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,833
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kalgoorlie Australia
Posts: 498
|
Quote:
Wow congrats you finally fluked one right!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kalgoorlie Australia
Posts: 498
|
Quote:
I'm in agreeance with a lot of your posts. Dont let the others annoy you there all shit stirrers, it's part and parcel of posting here!! Cadel did well Yesterday and I hope he does the same today, Popo in my opinion and as I posted earlier in the thread has done nothing in this tour so far purely because he hasn't been needed. He wqas there if needed yesterday and I think the same will go for today!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,833
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#150 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
I would suggest you not make up your own opinions; but if you insist, put your Cadel-hate aside for one moment and you might find yourself starting to make sense. Quote:
I am aware of the baiting going on and I avoid replying to it. But if they post what I see as inaccurate stuff I'm happy to correct them. I don't hold out hope they will take it on board but there are others reading these threads. |
||
|
|
|