![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
A little off topic but I thought people here would enjoy it. Possibly the stupidest attempt to quantify aerodynamic drag improvements yet:
"Avanti also has a new time trial and triathlon frame, the Chrono, and a track frame, the Pista. Wind tunnel testing of the Chrono has resulted in a bike that's 57 seconds/hour faster than the 2008 model, according to Avanti, thanks to slotted Jetstream stays, internal cable routing and other refinements. " ![]() (from http://cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=...s/2009_avanti08) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
"Avanti worked with Morgan Nicol of Oval Concepts in the San Diego Low Speed Wind Tunnel on the design of the Chrono. Managing director John Struthers admitted he wasn't sure the company would ever recoup the development cost of the Chrono, but it was clear everyone at Avanti was immensely proud of the very slippery-looking result. " Hmmm... looks like someone may have some data to actually validate that claim ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
You are going along with the joke or you need to read it again? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,674
|
That bike just uses metric time, which will certainly be outlawed by the UCI before it hits the streets.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 44
|
LOLers.
My brother is a marketing major and I'm a scientist. Now you wonder why we don't get along? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 956
|
Marketers know the power of a placebo.
__________________
"friendship, family, religion. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business!" -Mr. Burns ![]() The faster you go, the fewer passing cars
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,736
|
presumably in order to have time go faster, Avanti have also been able to lessen the impact of gravity making the gains in a hill climb TT even greater
![]() I can't believe I'm not in marketing ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 434
|
Avanti is a NZ company and this is just the latest in hype from a company that is full of talk and short on delivery. Their greatest contribution to the industry is to overstock their bikes and have to flood the market with cheap bikes where no one wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 60
|
Yeah, I don't see it as being much worse than the efficiency claims made by Specialized, Trek, C'dale, and others regarding stiffer frames. Funny how nobody has ever been able to tell us how many watts are saved by increasing stiffness by X%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,736
|
I think you're missing roadie's point.
You can't save seconds off an hour. An hour is an hour. 3,600 seconds. Unless you run on Avanti time then an hour is 3,503 seconds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,674
|
Quote:
![]() Much too smart for marketing, I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
I actually was looking at that wiki link and trying to work it into the start of this thread. I just wasn't quite smart enough to do it coherently. Well done Alex! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 15
|
I think 57 seconds per hour make sense.
57s per 3,600s is just another way of saying 1.58% faster. If the marketing people had said, hey, it makes you 1.58% faster you would have had to think, I wonder how much quicker that is for my 40k TT. Oh, that's about 57s. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Ya, to the average person at the LBS buying a bike, 57s per hour would make a lot more sense than 1.58%. Even though it really doesn't make any sense, if you think about it at all. |
|
|
|
|