Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Oh Dear - When Marketing People Do Science

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-08.-2008, 12:08 PM   #16
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Oh Dear - When Marketing People Do Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri Tigger
I think 57 seconds per hour make sense.


Um...

Quote:
57s per 3,600s is just another way of saying 1.58% faster.


Speed1 = x = d/t1
t2 = (100-1.58)/100 X t1

Speed2 = d/t2

Speed change = (d/t1)/(d/t2) X 100 - 100
=t2/t1 X 100 - 100
=3600/3543 X 100 - 100
= 1.61%

Avanti have undersold!!!!!!!

Quote:
If the marketing people had said, hey, it makes you 1.58% faster you would have had to think, I wonder how much quicker that is for my 40k TT. Oh, that's about 57s.


Oh, that's about 52s.




And we haven't even started talking about how aerodynamic improvements affect slower and faster riders differently and the magnitude of the gain for a given ability depends on whether you express distance improvement, given time, or time improvement, given distance. (Talking about this would be giving marketing too much credit... they don't deserve that discussion from what they've provided.)
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-08.-2008, 02:17 PM   #17
swampy1970
Registered User
 
swampy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 590
Default Re: Oh Dear - When Marketing People Do Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadie_scum
Um...



Speed1 = x = d/t1
t2 = (100-1.58)/100 X t1

Speed2 = d/t2

Speed change = (d/t1)/(d/t2) X 100 - 100
=t2/t1 X 100 - 100
=3600/3543 X 100 - 100
= 1.61%

Avanti have undersold!!!!!!!



Oh, that's about 52s.




And we haven't even started talking about how aerodynamic improvements affect slower and faster riders differently and the magnitude of the gain for a given ability depends on whether you express distance improvement, given time, or time improvement, given distance. (Talking about this would be giving marketing too much credit... they don't deserve that discussion from what they've provided.)

Bell, when they lauched their "Vortex" helmet years ago (which I'm wearing in my little avatar), they had similar blurb with pretty graphs 'n shit that "showed" how much faster their helmet was compared to others with the reference being a rider who could ride at 25mph for an hour with a standard road skullbucket.

I know it's physically impossible to go 50 something seconds faster and still ride an hour for the same distance but we 'get it'.... Or at least some of us do.

Would you drop $5,000 on a 1.something% improvement? No, probably not. Mention "this piece of kit will shave off 2 seconds per mile" and all of a sudden it's "wallet emptying, small mortgage" time.
swampy1970 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet