![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
Um... Quote:
Speed1 = x = d/t1 t2 = (100-1.58)/100 X t1 Speed2 = d/t2 Speed change = (d/t1)/(d/t2) X 100 - 100 =t2/t1 X 100 - 100 =3600/3543 X 100 - 100 = 1.61% Avanti have undersold!!!!!!! Quote:
Oh, that's about 52s. ![]() And we haven't even started talking about how aerodynamic improvements affect slower and faster riders differently and the magnitude of the gain for a given ability depends on whether you express distance improvement, given time, or time improvement, given distance. (Talking about this would be giving marketing too much credit... they don't deserve that discussion from what they've provided.) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
Bell, when they lauched their "Vortex" helmet years ago (which I'm wearing in my little avatar), they had similar blurb with pretty graphs 'n shit that "showed" how much faster their helmet was compared to others with the reference being a rider who could ride at 25mph for an hour with a standard road skullbucket. I know it's physically impossible to go 50 something seconds faster and still ride an hour for the same distance but we 'get it'.... Or at least some of us do. Would you drop $5,000 on a 1.something% improvement? No, probably not. Mention "this piece of kit will shave off 2 seconds per mile" and all of a sudden it's "wallet emptying, small mortgage" time. |
|
|
|
|