Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Is cycling the most physically demanding sport ?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-02.-2004, 10:07 AM   #16
Beastt
Registered User
 
Beastt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arizona (USA)
Posts: 1,141
Send a message via AIM to Beastt Send a message via Yahoo to Beastt
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is cycling the most physically demanding sport?

Quote:
Originally posted by cycleboy
According to his bio Ned Overend finished 24th in the 1980 Ironman. However, he finished 1st in '98 and '99 in the Xterra Triathlon which I think is the short course or sprint variety.


Guess I got my triathlons mixed up. You're right, it was the Xterra he won, competing against men in their early 20s. I suppose the point still holds that pro cyclists can often compete and do well in other sports, although, I should also point out that it was during the cycling event that he made up lost time.

Beastt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02.-2004, 11:23 AM   #17
cycleboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is cycling the most physically demanding sport?

Quote:
Originally posted by Beastt
Guess I got my triathlons mixed up. You're right, it was the Xterra he won, competing against men in their early 20s. I suppose the point still holds that pro cyclists can often compete and do well in other sports, although, I should also point out that it was during the cycling event that he made up lost time.



It's interesting that in the early triathlons it was the former swimmers that prevailed (ie Dave Scott) but eventually it was the former cyclists who took over because that's where the most time could be gained.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02.-2004, 09:36 PM   #18
2LAP
Moderator
 
2LAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
Default

While I think Boxing is very demanding, I wonder about the frequency and durations of the events.

Pro cyclists seem to hurt more often and for longer than pro boxers. I would also argue that this was the case in training as well.

As a junior I started in 53 races in one year (in the season its easy to do three or more races a week in the UK) and still managed to have a three month 'off season' between the road and cross races. Not sure how many amature or junior boxers would do that much competition?
__________________
www.cyclingforums.com

Last edited by 2LAP : 09-02.-2004 at 09:50 PM.
2LAP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02.-2004, 11:31 PM   #19
tomdavis80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 2LAP
While I think Boxing is very demanding, I wonder about the frequency and durations of the events.

Pro cyclists seem to hurt more often and for longer than pro boxers. I would also argue that this was the case in training as well.

As a junior I started in 53 races in one year (in the season its easy to do three or more races a week in the UK) and still managed to have a three month 'off season' between the road and cross races. Not sure how many amature or junior boxers would do that much competition?


The problem is that the nature of competition in boxing has the capacity for long term damage. However, junior boxers may compete twice a month, I think. I doubt they would compete more than 30 times in a year. Cycling has very little chance of long term damage from blows to the head. Some professionals will fight early on in their careers 10 fights in a year. But as they get higher and higher in the competition, their bodies cannot take the abuse of getting rammed 10 times a year at 10 rounds each time where early on, they were fight 4-6 rounds with lower level type opponents.

With cycling, you can train everyday and compete often because a cyclist doesn't have to worry so much about long term damage to the brain and most of the training and pain actually helps the body adapt to it, but a boxer can't do the same thing due to the fact that most of the abuse goes to the brain and the brain is the one thing everyone needs to continue competing and existing.

Thomas Davis
tomdavis80 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02.-2004, 12:10 AM   #20
2LAP
Moderator
 
2LAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by tomdavis80
The problem is that the nature of competition in boxing has the capacity for long term damage. However, junior boxers may compete twice a month, I think. I doubt they would compete more than 30 times in a year. Cycling has very little chance of long term damage from blows to the head. Some professionals will fight early on in their careers 10 fights in a year. But as they get higher and higher in the competition, their bodies cannot take the abuse of getting rammed 10 times a year at 10 rounds each time where early on, they were fight 4-6 rounds with lower level type opponents.

With cycling, you can train everyday and compete often because a cyclist doesn't have to worry so much about long term damage to the brain and most of the training and pain actually helps the body adapt to it, but a boxer can't do the same thing due to the fact that most of the abuse goes to the brain and the brain is the one thing everyone needs to continue competing and existing.

Thomas Davis

Do you consider a single pro boxing match to be more 'demanding' than a Classic, a Stage of the Tour or the whole Tour de France?

While cycling has little head damage; cycling is arguably more dangerous (a couple of deaths in amature TT's last year) and 'extensive' drug use in the pro peleton also presents its own risks (and may even shorten life spans).

After completing the Junior Tour of Ireland (9 stages over 8 days); I had bronchitus and it took me at least two months until I was fully recovered. I guess that would be comparable to or more than the recoveries from the most demanding Junior competitions in boxing?

I must admit I'm bias for cycling as its the most demanding thing I've ever done; yet I have never boxed.
__________________
www.cyclingforums.com
2LAP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02.-2004, 06:00 AM   #21
tomdavis80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 2LAP
Do you consider a single pro boxing match to be more 'demanding' than a Classic, a Stage of the Tour or the whole Tour de France?

While cycling has little head damage; cycling is arguably more dangerous (a couple of deaths in amature TT's last year) and 'extensive' drug use in the pro peleton also presents its own risks (and may even shorten life spans).

After completing the Junior Tour of Ireland (9 stages over 8 days); I had bronchitus and it took me at least two months until I was fully recovered. I guess that would be comparable to or more than the recoveries from the most demanding Junior competitions in boxing?

I must admit I'm bias for cycling as its the most demanding thing I've ever done; yet I have never boxed.


Oh, I have no doubt that the Tour De France is probably the most demanding event for any athlete in my mind, but what I am arguing here is the nature of the training and competitions in boxing as compared to cycling. Some cyclists can have a lot of natural talent and win a good number of races at some categories but the same can't really be said about boxing because a boxer doesn't really have the luxury of not training and expecting to be able to win against a midlevel amateur fighter. It takes lots of experience, instinct, and training along with talent to be able to handle that kind of competition because every other boxer's training like you are.

But there is no question about the competition of the Tour De France being the most demanding athletic event for any sport or event. Most cyclists who even tried to handle a Tour De France level event even if it was a lower level event and not the high level and speed that it is with the pros, it would take a toll on any cyclist's body.

I have experienced something similar to you and Bronchitis, but not so severe. I participated in the 35 mile El Tour de Tucson for the first race that I ever did last November and I was slightly sick with the flu and had a nasty headache the night before but felt better that morning. I decided to race anyways and I put every ounce of energy I had out on the road and that caused me to be laid out in bed for a week suffering from the energy drain of the 35 mile race while finishing 8th which isn't too bad.

Thomas Davis
tomdavis80 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02.-2004, 04:34 AM   #22
Styler
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
Default

No-one's yet metioned the Marathon des Sables. Running across the Sahara for days on end must be one of the greatest challenges on earth...

I know some serious mountaineers, and have met some really serious ones. I think climbing successes are usually mostly down to sheer bloodymindedness, although the guys are often pretty fit. Saying that, Stephen Venables (first brit to climb Everest without supplementary oxygen) only quit smoking a week or two before leaving for Nepal!

Polar explorers are another possibility. Is walking unsupported across the Arctic harder than the Tour? There's clearly a big difference between finishing the Tour and winning it...
Styler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02.-2004, 04:52 AM   #23
Tmax1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 100
Default

(first brit to climb Everest without supplementary oxygen) only quit smoking a week or two before leaving for Nepal!

I wounder how he quit.

I'm struggling....

Tmax1
Tmax1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02.-2004, 04:53 AM   #24
Tmax1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 100
Default

"wounder"

Wound...hmm. Not just a slip or a mis-spell I am sure...

Tm1
Tmax1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02.-2004, 05:55 AM   #25
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,586
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Styler
No-one's yet metioned the Marathon des Sables. Running across the Sahara for days on end must be one of the greatest challenges on earth...

I know some serious mountaineers, and have met some really serious ones. I think climbing successes are usually mostly down to sheer bloodymindedness, although the guys are often pretty fit. Saying that, Stephen Venables (first brit to climb Everest without supplementary oxygen) only quit smoking a week or two before leaving for Nepal!

Polar explorers are another possibility. Is walking unsupported across the Arctic harder than the Tour? There's clearly a big difference between finishing the Tour and winning it...


This was the event that I was trying to recall when I posted this question initially : Marathon des Sables.
Indeed, I think this event is very,very tough (I am acquainted with some one who did this - and this person is a very good amateur cyclist and he told me that MDS is tougher than the RAS :
the RAS being Irelands premier cycling event).
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02.-2004, 06:31 AM   #26
Styler
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
Default

the fact is that amateurs compete in and do quite well in the marathon des sables. the same cannot be said about the tour de france.

i've read about ultratriathlons, and get the impression that they're very tough too. however, i would have thought that the fitness and determination to win at a more competitive level (ironman for instance) would have to be higher than to win at a longer yet more specialised distance.
Styler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02.-2004, 03:04 PM   #27
Aztec
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
Default

I have never come across anything more painful or demanding than a single set of 20 rep full squats with a weight that has you seriously doubting whether you'll make 20 when you reach number 11 or so. Truly hardcore lifting is about as demanding and painful as the body can stand.

And I just don't think we can compare intensity vs. duration. The total sum of pain/effort is surely higher in cycling, but many real lifters have a tough time sleeping the night before 20-rep squat day because of the anxiety associated with that intensity.

So it's all apples to oranges.
Aztec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-02.-2004, 05:09 PM   #28
taras0000
Registered User
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 232
Default

I played Junior A hockey for a couple of years before taking cycling full time. Let me tell you, the practices that we had were insane. they were basically two hour interval sessions. Although it's not as hard as the racing that i've done, it damn hurt a lot more. the burn inthe legs was akin to doing a kilo. except over and over again. plus the full contact aspect hurts too. and you heat up under all that equipment. still the kilo is the most painful event i've done.
__________________
Taras
taras0000 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03.-2004, 04:11 AM   #29
Psycorower
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Is cycling the most physically demanding sport ?

Quote:
Originally posted by limerickman
Have been reading some stuff about rowing (Steve Redgraves
Biography : 1984,1988,1992,1996 and 2000 Olympic Gold Medallist Rower) and about hard he trained to reach the top of his sport.
This got me to thinking : you read of cyclists doing 30k kilometres
of training BEFORE the season commences :
Is cycling the most physically demanding sport there is ?
If you consider some other sport to be more physically demanding, perhaps you could tell us why this is so ?


I'd have to say that rowing is the most physically demanding sport in my opinion. I've rowed competitively for 5 years, training 2-3hours a day on the water and usually a couple of hours in the gym aswell. I switched to cycling becuase i did percieve it as slightly easier. It is still a brutal sport no question but in cycling i have found that only my legs and ass hurt and my breating and heart are going like crazy, I can focus on a part of my body that isn't hurting, like my arms or something. In rowing, EVERYTHING and i mean EVERYTHING hurts, and i don't just mean aching i mean proper hurting. Also as you are using your whole body, the pressor reflex is greater in rowing so your heart rate will be higher for a given work rate and the percieved effort is even greater.
Cycling is a tough sport but after the past 5 years rowing, i feel like i'm on holiday.
I'm sure people could find similar arguments for most other sports but i've tried a hell of a lot of them and in my humble opinion rowing is right up there.
Psycorower is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03.-2004, 07:35 AM   #30
tomdavis80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 149
Default

Wow, I'm enjoying the wide variety of opinions regarding which sport is the most demanding. Of course, I did put in my two cents for boxing as something comparable to cycling, but it doesn't mean that it's gospel.

Thomas Davis
tomdavis80 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet