Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Track Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Max RPM's

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-03.-2004, 04:47 AM   #1
ckret
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Default Max RPM's

Is there any standarize testing to compare max RPMS. My training partners and I have a standing competition on a lifecycle at our gym, but i know there has to be some type of testing that has been done.

Anyone interested, the best we can do is 254 at a standard level of 8. I am sure gym bikes are all different so unless you use the one we use there really is no comparison, but it makes our workouts a little more interesting.
ckret is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03.-2004, 12:32 PM   #2
Sprinter_989
Registered User
 
Sprinter_989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 229
Default

254!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who got that???
Most I've ever got is 224 on indoor trainer.
__________________
http://www.goldstars.4t.com/
Sprinter_989 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03.-2004, 04:53 PM   #3
taras0000
Registered User
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 232
Default

I do mine on rollers and the best i've done was 263. My rollers don't have any resistance unit on them, and i get the result off of my speedometer. Try it this way, on your own bike, you may get a higher reading. And no cheating, must be done with a fixed gear.
__________________
Taras
taras0000 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03.-2004, 04:48 PM   #4
Sprinter_989
Registered User
 
Sprinter_989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 229
Default

No resistance!!!!! thats a great idea no wonder i can only get up to 224
__________________
http://www.goldstars.4t.com/
Sprinter_989 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05.-2004, 03:57 PM   #5
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default Re: Max RPM's

My computer cadence readout stops at 199.

So my brag is I can do 199+ with and without resistance
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05.-2004, 04:18 PM   #6
steve
Administrator
 
steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Below Australia -20 years
Posts: 1,993
Send a message via ICQ to steve
Default

about 220 for me, although I havent tried it for 5 or 6 years
__________________
Steve

CyclingForums.com
steve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05.-2004, 01:30 PM   #7
velomanct
Registered User
 
velomanct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 957
Default

i hit 242 on my trainer with no resistence about 4 years ago.
with light resistence i can do about 220
__________________
"friendship, family, religion. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business!" -Mr. Burns
The faster you go, the fewer passing cars
velomanct is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-05.-2004, 10:21 PM   #8
Lasalles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 221
Default

This may be incorrect but i think i recalled an old article saying that Gary Neiwand clocked 300rpm in training once.
__________________
Hillbrick Zona Track
Felt CA1(Road Hack)
Lasalles is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06.-2004, 02:50 PM   #9
taras0000
Registered User
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 232
Default

300 rpm, i could believe it. I witnessed Kurt Harnett hit 275
__________________
Taras
taras0000 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 12:38 AM   #10
drewjc
Registered User
 
drewjc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bathurst, NSW, Australia
Posts: 327
Default

300 sounds a lot but Gary Niewand was awesome in his day. My best is about 220 on the road and 240 on the rollers i think. Another slightly different comparison/competition would be to see who can travel at the higest speed on the rollers in any gear on any bike. My best is about 95km/h i think, not brilliant but i had that 53x12 pumping!
drewjc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 02:01 AM   #11
bikeguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jyvaskyla, Finland
Posts: 665
Default

I don't see what's so fantastic/useful about 300 rpm with no resistance, it's equivalent to 5 stride per second turnover rate in a 60-100 meter dash (running) *except* that there is a high load and ROM in sprinting. I can hit 275 rpm with no load on a bicycle ergo, the gym guys asked me not to use the equipment anymore because they said I'd break it! My best 100 m is about 11.4 sec, but I can't approach 5 strides/sec (more like very low 4's) because my muscles power is poor in that range of motion. If you can reach 5 strides/sec with a reasonable stride length in a 100m dash, you'll win every race. I don't see the high rpm no load ergometer rpm relevance to cycle track sprinting as max rpm is 160-170, nowhere near 250+ rpm and the loads are quite high (if you can do 70+ km/h).
bikeguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 02:01 AM   #12
bikeguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jyvaskyla, Finland
Posts: 665
Default

I don't see what's so fantastic/useful about 300 rpm with no resistance, it's equivalent to 5 stride per second turnover rate in a 60-100 meter dash (running) *except* that there is a high load and ROM in sprinting. I can hit 275 rpm with no load on a bicycle ergo, the gym guys asked me not to use the equipment anymore because they said I'd break it! My best 100 m is about 11.4 sec, but I can't approach 5 strides/sec (more like very low 4's) because my muscles power is poor in that range of motion. If you can reach 5 strides/sec with a reasonable stride length in a 100m dash, you'll win every race. I don't see the high rpm no load ergometer rpm relevance to cycle track sprinting as max rpm is 160-170, nowhere near 250+ rpm and the loads are quite high (if you can do 70+ km/h).
bikeguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 05:33 AM   #13
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bikeguy
I don't see what's so fantastic/useful about 300 rpm with no resistance, it's equivalent to 5 stride per second turnover rate in a 60-100 meter dash (running) *except* that there is a high load and ROM in sprinting. I can hit 275 rpm with no load on a bicycle ergo, the gym guys asked me not to use the equipment anymore because they said I'd break it! My best 100 m is about 11.4 sec, but I can't approach 5 strides/sec (more like very low 4's) because my muscles power is poor in that range of motion. If you can reach 5 strides/sec with a reasonable stride length in a 100m dash, you'll win every race. I don't see the high rpm no load ergometer rpm relevance to cycle track sprinting as max rpm is 160-170, nowhere near 250+ rpm and the loads are quite high (if you can do 70+ km/h).


Overspeed work is carried out for athletics track training. When I was sprint training we used a pulley tow device to ensure we went 10% over our max speed. The same device was used in reverse to limit our max speed at max effort to 90% for underspeed.

The Soviet Bloc during the Cold War had learned through their extensive sports research programs using human guinea pigs that overspeed and underspeed training at the same maximum effort allowed sprinters to break through a physiological speed barrier.

If you could achieve 11.4 secs for 100m and you did not carry out these methods (would be only through lack of equipment or you are showing your age ) then your coach would have you under instructions not to train at 100% speed but a maximum of 95-98%. Training at 100% re-inforced this barrier limit.

The same principle applies to overspeed work on a bicycle ergo or low gear downhill on the road.

A rider who can achieve these 200+ rpm's on either zero or low resistance on an ergo improves the firing signals to his/her sprinting muscles so improved cadence, better control and forces can be applied in the competitive sprint range of 140-170 rpms.

Overspeed work on a bicycle ergo was also recommended for track sprinters in some publications I read at the time. However, I consider the principles of specificity would be breached.

It is not recommended to overspeed regularly, as you can fatigue your central nervous system (CNS). That fatigue cannot be detected and can only be presumed on the days when for some unfathomable reason you lack the zip.

One report I heard (heresay) was that the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) recommended at least 10 days to fully recover from CNS overspeed work.
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"

Last edited by VeloFlash : 03-06.-2004 at 05:40 AM.
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 06:11 AM   #14
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default

Bikeguy, here is part of a coaching article I located related to athletic overspeed training -

"At Lisle we have done quite a bit of research on the effects of overspeed training, and are convinced that two things occur when athletes are sprint assisted: first, the towing procedure "lights up" the central nervous system, bringing into play great numbers of neurons; second, it makes the legs more responsive to ground reaction. By lighting up the central nervous system, I mean that towing alters the timing of the nervous impulse to the effect on muscles. In other words, towing creates some anticipatory firing, and this kind of firing enhances intramuscular coordination. In terms of ground reaction response, we theorize that the increase in horizontal momentum resulting from towing alters the capacity for joint stabilization at the ankle and knee, thereby allowing for a greater transmission of force."

Overspeed training for cycle track sprinting is on the same parallel minus the ground reaction.
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06.-2004, 09:54 AM   #15
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bikeguy
I don't see what's so fantastic/useful about 300 rpm with no resistance, it's equivalent to 5 stride per second turnover rate in a 60-100 meter dash (running) *except* that there is a high load and ROM in sprinting. I can hit 275 rpm with no load on a bicycle ergo, the gym guys asked me not to use the equipment anymore because they said I'd break it! My best 100 m is about 11.4 sec, but I can't approach 5 strides/sec (more like very low 4's) because my muscles power is poor in that range of motion. If you can reach 5 strides/sec with a reasonable stride length in a 100m dash, you'll win every race. I don't see the high rpm no load ergometer rpm relevance to cycle track sprinting as max rpm is 160-170, nowhere near 250+ rpm and the loads are quite high (if you can do 70+ km/h).


Somehow my edit of a previous post left out another comment.

You are calculating a 5 strides per second running rate is equivalent to a 300rpm cycling cadence.

With due respect you have missed the point. A cyclist is computed at 300rpm (or 5 revs per second) for each leg whereas the runner, per leg, is only calculating a turnover of 2.5 strides per second.

So comparing apples with apples, the runner must have a stride rate of 10 strides per second to be equivalent to the cyclist at 300rpm.

A sub 5 second 100m?
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet