Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of Years Ago



R

Rich.@.

Guest
Jan stated that Jews debunked Jesus and told lies. She said that is
where debunking and lying started.

She goes on to say that lying and debunking NOW comes second nature to
Jews.

>Jan says:
>That was the start of debunking.
>Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
>to debunk his words, and even
>debunked his miracles whch happened right
>before their eyes.
>
>Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
>They debunked all his words and works,
>and now debunking and lies are second
>nature to them. That is how Satan works.


Clearly she is generally blaming Jews today of the sins of some Jews
from the past. That is like blaming Germans today for the crimes of
******. That would be like me saying that all Christians are bigoted
anti-semites because Jan Drew is one.

Jan Drew like most bigots tends to overgeneralize based upon limited
experience.

Jan claims that she never met a Jew before coming to this newsgroup.
That alone suggests Jan led a very sheltered /restricted life.

Then she is confronted on mha by a number of people who she believes
to be Jewish either because they said they were or because she
believes them to be. Then she generalizes her attitude toward these
Jews to all (or most all) Jews.

This is why she said that ALL Jews in this newsgroup have lied. Of
course she had to retract that considering her good buddy Ilena is a
Jew. I bet Jan wishes that Ilena was a Christian. It would make things
a lot easier for her.

Aloha,

Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
>: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of Years Ago

Another lie.

No where have I ever said any such thing.

Rampant lies from the obsessed *gang.*

Jan

Attemp to nuke posts, didn't work.

Pattern clearly seen, long before me.

http://tinyurl.com/39u2g
 
On 24 Feb 2004 05:52:54 GMT, [email protected] (Jan) wrote:

>>: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of Years Ago
>
>Another lie.


Wonder why Jan snipped the PROOF using Jan's OWN WORDS.
>
>No where have I ever said any such thing.

Reposted:

>Jan says:
>That was the start of debunking.
>Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
>to debunk his words, and even
>debunked his miracles whch happened right
>before their eyes.
>
>Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
>They debunked all his words and works,
>and now debunking and lies are second
>nature to them. That is how Satan works.


Clearly she is generally blaming Jews today of the sins of some Jews
from the past. That is like blaming Germans today for the crimes of
******. That would be like me saying that all Christians are bigoted
anti-semites because Jan Drew is one.

>
>Rampant lies from the obsessed *gang.*

The lies come from Jan Drew. The truth is for all to see. God sees
what Jan posts. God knows that Jan called a Jewish man a "Jew boy".
God knows that Jan said that lying comes second nature to Jews. God
knows that Jan took almost a year to admit that ****** was wrong even
though she was repeatedly confronted about it. Jan may fool some
people but she won't fool God.
>
>Jan
>
>Attemp to nuke posts, didn't work.

What does my nuking posts have to do with Jan being a despicable
antisemite? Answer: Nothing. It is another diversionary tactic of this
ignorant despicable anti-Semite. She cannot dispute my statements with
facts. She must resort to lies and bearing false witness. Sad that.
>
>Pattern clearly seen, long before me.

<snip Jan's attempt to divert attention away from the subject>

Aloha,

Rich

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
Hey Rich,

What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
"Jew Boy"..


Cheers, Rod.

<Rich.@.> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 24 Feb 2004 05:52:54 GMT, [email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>
> >>: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of Years Ago
> >
> >Another lie.
>
>
> Wonder why Jan snipped the PROOF using Jan's OWN WORDS.
> >
> >No where have I ever said any such thing.
>
> Reposted:
>
> >Jan says:
> >That was the start of debunking.
> >Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
> >to debunk his words, and even
> >debunked his miracles whch happened right
> >before their eyes.
> >
> >Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
> >They debunked all his words and works,
> >and now debunking and lies are second
> >nature to them. That is how Satan works.
>
>
> Clearly she is generally blaming Jews today of the sins of some Jews
> from the past. That is like blaming Germans today for the crimes of
> ******. That would be like me saying that all Christians are bigoted
> anti-semites because Jan Drew is one.
>
> >
> >Rampant lies from the obsessed *gang.*
>
> The lies come from Jan Drew. The truth is for all to see. God sees
> what Jan posts. God knows that Jan called a Jewish man a "Jew boy".
> God knows that Jan said that lying comes second nature to Jews. God
> knows that Jan took almost a year to admit that ****** was wrong even
> though she was repeatedly confronted about it. Jan may fool some
> people but she won't fool God.
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >Attemp to nuke posts, didn't work.
>
> What does my nuking posts have to do with Jan being a despicable
> antisemite? Answer: Nothing. It is another diversionary tactic of this
> ignorant despicable anti-Semite. She cannot dispute my statements with
> facts. She must resort to lies and bearing false witness. Sad that.
> >
> >Pattern clearly seen, long before me.
>
> <snip Jan's attempt to divert attention away from the subject>
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
"Rod" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Hey Rich,
>
> What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
> and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
> In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
> "Jew Boy"..
>
>
> Cheers, Rod.

Your use of such an anti-Semetic term is very telling -- why not just
admit & own the prejudice inside you?
 
>"Rod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> Hey Rich,
>>
>> What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
>> and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
>> In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
>> "Jew Boy"..
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Rod.
>
>Your use of such an anti-Semetic term is very telling -- why not just
>admit & own the prejudice inside you?
>

Because, owning up to and admitting one's mistakes is the act of an adult with
a soul. Besides, he can't own the prejudice inside of him as long as he let's
it own him.

I'm sure Rod would say that this statement in no way shows hatred toward Jews
as a group, but only a ****** would allege such a thing.

From: Rod ([email protected])
Subject: Re: ReMarking the Probert, Marla..
View: Complete Thread (78 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2003-01-31 05:22:09 PST


Hi Andrew and Aloha Rich,

What pathetic pieces of **** you two boys are,
Forgive me if I ask are you both Jewish?
 
>Subject: Re: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of
>Years Ago
>From: "Rod" [email protected]
>Date: 2/24/2004 4:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>Hey Rich,
>
>What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
>and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
>In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
>"Jew Boy"..
>
>
>Cheers, Rod.

Poor Rich, he is a lot like Andy Langer.

When no such thing were said, he'll post words that he thinks will prove his
point.

What's more the *gang* keeps taking my words that are true and reposting them.

>Clearly

Rich has a problem.

Jan

http://tinyurl.com/39u2g
 
On 25 Feb 2004 00:45:32 GMT, [email protected] (Jan) wrote:

>>Subject: Re: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of
>>Years Ago
>>From: "Rod" [email protected]
>>Date: 2/24/2004 4:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>>
>>Hey Rich,
>>
>>What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
>>and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
>>In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
>>"Jew Boy"..
>>
>>
>>Cheers, Rod.
>
>Poor Rich, he is a lot like Andy Langer.

Notice that Jan did not say anything to Rod about using the term "Jew
Boy". Jan *claims* that at the time she first used that term she did
not know it was a slur. She now knows it is a slur and yet says
nothing. This speaks volumes to her lack of integrity and hypocrisy.

>What's more the *gang* keeps taking my words that are true and reposting them.

True?? Oh you mean like *these* statements that you claim are true
your ignorant despicable anti-semitic bigot:

>Their are Jews here and there are atheists,
>(they are the ones who have told the group) with the
>exception of IIena, they have proven themselves
>to be liars, deceitful and insulters.
>
>Furthmore, I called Andrew Kingoff a Jew Boy when
>he posted the stupid blasphemy of the 10 commandments
>here on the ng.
>
>That's because most every atheist and jew here
>has INDEED lied. They know it,
>yet they cover for each other.
>
>The group here are mostly atheists and jews,
>(who falsely believe they are enlightened) and need
>to have an argument going, thinking they can boast their
>ego. They tell lies, twist what is said, and IMHO
>are lead by Satan.
>
>The truth is that most debunkers on MHA
>who LIE through their tetth, do nothing
>but belittle, and are filled with hate, are atheists or jews.
>
>I repeat:
>The debubnker's here are atheist or jews.
>
>No, they aren't right, they are greatly deceived
>as Eve was when Satan debunked
>God's word.
>That was the start of debunking.
>Then the jews Jesus's very own people tried
>to debunk his words, and even
>debunked his miracles whch happened right
>before their eyes.
>
>Yes Jesus was a jew, his own people rejected him.
>They debunked all his words and works,
>and now debunking and lies are second
>nature to them. That is how Satan works.
>
>Most of the debunkers are either atheists or Jews.
>
>It seems the Jews here have taken over this ng,
>with their vile false accusations and they are all filled
>with hate.
>
>It seems to me the Jews here are trying to get even
>for the holocaust. When noone here was in any way
>involved.

Jan continues to assert that all the above is true. Is there any doubt
about her anti-semitism? the question is rhetorical as the answer is
obvious.

Aloha,

Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
[email protected] (Jan) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> >Subject: Re: Jan blames Jews Today for the Sins of Jews from Thousands of
> >Years Ago
> >From: [email protected] (Michele)
> >Date: 2/24/2004 1:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email protected]>
> >
> >"Rod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:<[email protected]>...
> >> Hey Rich,
> >>
> >> What a load of **** you write. Have a good look at yourself, spew, repent
> >> and perhaps then the good Lord will take mercy on you.
> >> In the meantime, please find another place to post your foul accusations
> >> "Jew Boy"..
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers, Rod.
> >
> >Your use of such an anti-Semetic term is very telling -
>
> This doesn't tell Michele anything.


(Can't resist) NOT JAN.
 
<<
Jan continues to assert that all the above is true. Is there any doubt
about her anti-semitism? the question is rhetorical as the answer is
obvious. >>

And what about those protesting the film, "The Passion"....after seeing what I
have seen in the past week...I applaud Gibson for his freedom of
expression.....





"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).
 
On 02 Mar 2004 00:02:56 GMT, [email protected]ojunk (DEBBEE1023)
wrote:

><<
>Jan continues to assert that all the above is true. Is there any doubt
>about her anti-semitism? the question is rhetorical as the answer is
>obvious. >>
>
>And what about those protesting the film, "The Passion"....after seeing what I
>have seen in the past week...I applaud Gibson for his freedom of
>expression.....

Do you think that the protesters have the same freedom of expression
as Gibson??


Aloha,

Rich
>
>
>
>
>
>"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance
 
<< Do you think that the protesters have the same freedom of expression
as Gibson?? >>


Ofcourse I do....I just find it amusing that they have chosen Gibson's film to
protest, and make claims that really don't exist.....




"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).
 
"DEBBEE1023" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> <<
> Jan continues to assert that all the above is true. Is there any doubt
> about her anti-semitism? the question is rhetorical as the answer is
> obvious. >>
>
> And what about those protesting the film, "The Passion"....after seeing
what I
> have seen in the past week...

What have you actually seen? People concerned that a movie such as this can
inflame anti-Judaism? That is a valid concern as there are Christian
organizations which have made this exact point.

I applaud Gibson for his freedom of
> expression.....

Gibson has freedom of expression, but, his movie certainly is not free.
 
"DEBBEE1023" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> << Do you think that the protesters have the same freedom of expression
> as Gibson?? >>
>
>
> Ofcourse I do....I just find it amusing that they have chosen Gibson's
film to
> protest, and make claims that really don't exist.....

I see. So you find valid concerns by people that his movie can inflame
antisemitism to be amusing. You must have loved Treblinka.

And, the claims are quite real and are not just being made by Jews.
 
<< And, the claims are quite real and are not just being made by Jews. >>


Who else are they being made by?


"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).
 
<<
Gibson has freedom of expression, but, his movie certainly is not free. >>

Some people have gotten "free tickets" to the premiere showings, so this
statement in itself is not a true one.




"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).
 
"DEBBEE1023" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> << And, the claims are quite real and are not just being made by Jews. >>
>
>
> Who else are they being made by?

I posted several quotes from a Catholic Theologian and Scholar. Find them
and read them.
 
"DEBBEE1023" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> <<
> Gibson has freedom of expression, but, his movie certainly is not free. >>
>
> Some people have gotten "free tickets" to the premiere showings, so this
> statement in itself is not a true one.

Horsecrap. It raked in over $100M the first week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back