On 2005-08-17, Mike C <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm no expert, but you're teaching your body to run comfortably at a
> 10:30 pace....
No, it is not about "teaching your body to run" at some particular pace in
during these workouts. It just doesn't work like that. You are (to
simplify a little bit) training your muscles to keep working for a long time
without getting tired.
> race day might be a jolt expecting it to run 2 1/2
> minutes per mile at that distance faster....
If you've done some speed work, your body has already learned how to run much
faster than marathon race pace.
In practice, marathon race pace is seldom a "jolt", provided that pace has
some basis in reality (e.g. 30-90 seconds/mile slower than HM race pace)
> That being said, conventional wisdom dictates long run pace to be 2 to
> 2 1/2 minutes slower than race pace, but I've always taken that to mean
> *10k* race pace, not your marathon pace.
That sounds reasonable, but 2-2.5 min slower than 10k pace will be quite a
lot slower than marathon race pace if you're well trained. I agree that 2min+
slower than marathon pace is too slow for most people -- that's more like a
recovery dawdle.
So for example, my 10k race pace is about 5:50. So my training pace should
be no faster than 7:50 based on this. But my marathon pace is more than a
minute per mile faster.
> Could be wrong...if you have
> a relatively challenging goal in mind, then you need to pick up the
> pace just a bit as well as spending some of the time on your long runs
> at your goal marathon pace.
Disagree with this. There's nothing wrong with adopting this method, but it
certainly isn't necessary. I generally avoid going too slowly on long training
runs because for example if I ran 10 minutes per mile for an 18 miler, that's
3 hours of running whereas if I pick it up to about 8:00 a mile (still very
comfortable) I can bring that down to a little over 2hrs.
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/