Re: Brits Set To Justify Iraq War
One of our journalist's writes of your Deputy Prime Ministerhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7590260
|
Originally Posted by davidmc
One of our journalist's writes of your Deputy Prime Minister
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7590260 |
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
This incident occurred when a farmer pelted Prescot with an egg and then stood back and laughed. Prescot punched him and the farmer then wrestled him to the ground.
At any rate, I think the Labour Party will win the election and I think people are being very silly to vote Blair back in again. Once in power, he'll be arrogant as ever and my personal belief is the entire country will go ever further into decline (some may disagree with me here). But if you had a time machine and went back to the eighties and asked people if they would consider voting Labour the reply would be negative. It was understood a couple of decades ago that Labour would leave the country weak militarily and they'd have open borders to immigration. This is exactly what New Labour did do under the facade of Blair. Even heavy industry has suffered since Labour got into office, with countless manufacturing firms closing. The problem is people fear Michael Howard but you still have to take into account that a vote for Howard (or even Donald Duck) is a kick in the groin for Blair. My own view is even if Howard disappoints, you can still vote him out after 5 years and this is something the Tories understand by now. But Blair is arrogant and simply wants to be voted in again so he can feather his own nest and bank a few more million. And as for "working class" Prescot, the truth is he has a household of servants, butlers and all. How come it is so easy to con voters in our modern age I wonder. |

|
Originally Posted by davidmc
I don't know how your conservatives "operate" but ours farm out buisiness to the lowest bidder-China. What would Howard do for industry
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
As for America, I think Arnold would be a good bet as a future pres. He's a mix of liberal and conservative.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
of an illegal war by voting him back into office once more. Little matter that Blair actively encouraged Bush to invade Iraq and lied to the electorate, assuring people that Saddam could launch WMD in 45 minutes notice. Let's
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(1) Blair has never apologised for supporting war in Iraq and was prepared to lie to the elctorate over the issue of WMD. He encouraged Bush Junior to pursue his invasion policy and heaped scorn on the French when they refused to endorse his policies.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(2) Blair claims to represent the working classes but the reality is he comes from a highly priviliged background and spent his early years in an elite school, before going to university where his free education was funded by the State (under Thatcher ironically). His main cabinet members all enjoyed a free education but have denied the same privileges to normal people by introducing tuition fees and creating debt. While European students enjoy a free education, the average student in the U.K. finishes a course with a debt of 12,000 to pay off.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(3) Still on the topic of education, Blair has asserted he will allow European students to study in U.K. universities for free and is prepared to fund all students who arrive here to study from overseas. Yet no British student will
enjoy equal opportunities in Europe and will have to fund themselves while resident in other European countries. This isn't a level playing field and people are missing out of the advantages Europe has to offer. |
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(4) Literally thousands of illegal immigrants are arriving in on a yearly basis, displacing genuine refugees (such as victims of the Sunami e.t.c.) The Labour Party claims it is racist to object to such an open door policy but the truth is he's created a lucrative market for people trafficers and smugglers, who charge up to 20.000 pounds to get people in. Both France, Russia and even the U.S. have complained to Blair that known terrorists groups have successfully found refuge within his borders (while other European countries have far tighter controls).
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(5) Under Labour (the same as under George Bush) manufacturing has hit an all time low. The truth is the bread and butter manufacturing industries are relocating to countries like Poland or China and Blair (champion of the working classes) has done little to prevent this.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(6) The NHS has never been so bad as at present. Many people complain of 8 month waiting lists, simply because there are too many people using the service. Even under Thatcher, queues for operations and medical treatment weren't comparable with today. Yet the NHS is still treating people who come from abroad as health tourists for free.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
(7) Crime is worse under Blair and the prison population has risen significantly since he took office. A high prison population is always an indication of social inequality or poverty. Studies also reveal you are now far more likely to be mugged in London than in New York.
|

|
Originally Posted by Carrera
If Blair is voted back in office, this is clearly a very bad thing and it will be seen as tacit support for the Iraq war in Europe. Let's hope the polls have it wrong and the smile is wiped off Blair's face come the elections.
|
|
Originally Posted by darkboong
Let's be clear about it : It was simply more guff to support the case, no one took that "evidence" seriously, not even Blair. Basic psychology will tell you that, just look at what he said and his body language.
Cheers, B00ng. |
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
Our Conservatives were very good for industry but they failed to protect worker rights and workers in the U.K. had very few rights -
|
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
far less than Americans. Again, I really don't understand why the workers at
that time didn't fight more like the French and win those rights aggressively. |
|
Originally Posted by Carerra
What the Tories have to do basically is eat humble pie over the poll tax,
|
|
Originally Posted by Carerra
promise they will indeed value working rights in the future and promise us a referendum on Europe so we can decide in a democratic way.
|
|
Originally Posted by Carerra
But I can tell you that even though workers had a poor deal under the Tories, ordinary working folks did well under them. I come from a poor working class
|
|
Originally Posted by Carerra
family in a deprived area and got a free, grant funded education under the Tories. My cousin opened his own garage under the Tories and now he has 2
aeroplanes of his own. |
|
Originally Posted by Carerra
The truth is, I believe, the Tories were far less right wing than Blair but many people seem convinced that Labor and Blair are one and the same thing. Blair was fed with a silver spoon like Bush and neither of those guys knows much about real life and real people who have to pay the bills every week.
As for America, I think Arnold would be a good bet as a future pres. He's a mix of liberal and conservative. |
|
Originally Posted by davidmc
I don't know how your conservatives "operate" but ours farm out buisiness to the lowest bidder-China. What would Howard do for industry
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by darkboong
That pretty much covers it. The whole "Neoliberal" thing was introduced to the UK by Maggie Thatcher (Conservative), perpetuated by John Major (Conservative) and ground into our faces by Tony Blair (Labour). The Tories (aka Conservatives) have racked up more years of Neo-Liberal policy in office than any other party in the UK. They also did the hard work of breaking up the Unions and manufacturing into bite-sized and outsourceable chunks.
The Shipyards died under the watchful eye of Maggie Thatcher. The Steelworks died under Thatcher and Major. British Rail withered away under Maggie and was replaced by a bizarro "never going to work in a million years" privatisated mess, that has a worse safety record, worse perfomance record and consumes more than 3x as much tax-payer's money (in real terms) as did BR of old... Talk about corporate welfare. Oh, and "Intercity" type ticket prices are in excess of 4x what they were... Someone is making some *big* money there, even allowing for inflation. Westland withered and was kinda outsourced on Major's watch etc. Vickers went through a similar scenario. Rover has been a rolling disaster since the early 70s, although the Tories had the majority of the say in how that one panned out in the end. The cars that were built by Rover in the Thatcher & Major years were *abysmal*. INMOS was setup by Maggie, strangled by Maggie and Buried by Major (I worked there myself just as they got snapped up by STM). As an aside the *last* semi-conductor fab in the UK folded with the Conservatives at the helm... This was during a boom time as well, while they were busy handing out huge tax breaks and interest free loans to foreign companies in order to induce them to build factories in the UK. It's hard to see how the Tories have helped the manufacturing sector, they buried most of the big old engineering outfits that made Britain "Great". That's the Neo-Liberal Way. I'm amazed it took so long for the American public to cotton on to what it was really about, they had plenty of warning signs. |
Now our people are out of work & the repub's have made it illegal to claim bankruptcy. Go figure
Incidentally, that was a very informative post. Thanks darkboong 
|
Originally Posted by davidmc
We have been told-"Trade w/ China & they will eventually liberalize & open up their freedom of press & assembly". Well, its been twenty
|

|
Originally Posted by davidmc
years & those commie bastards (old-guard, gov't, bureaucrat, party officials) haven't let up an inch & were $160 billion in debt to them. Their bureaucrats
|
|
Originally Posted by davidmc
dine on shrimp scampi while their workers in American plants, among others;
|
|
Originally Posted by davidmc
make $1.50/hr & have dirt floor huts & polluted water & air. We oughta' pull out & let their people revolt
Now our people are out of work & the repub's have made it illegal to claim bankruptcy. Go figure Incidentally, that was a very informative post. Thanks darkboong ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by darkboong
Let's be clear about it : It was simply more guff to support the case, no one took that "evidence" seriously, not even Blair. Basic psychology will tell you that, just look at what he said and his body language while he said it.
That is so blatantly wrong that you are lying (on both counts). It's worth pointing out that Michael Howard advocated those plans himself while I was actually studying at University. Labour have simply executed the conservative policies anyway. I never saw the conservatives stand up just once against the higher education "reforms", they in fact got the ball rolling with slashing grants and introducing the Student Loan. Some of the Labour scumbags did actually speak out against it, and some still do. Not that I will vote for them either. Bull****. The problem has been grossly overstated by racists IMO and it's a non-issue for most people in reality. The costs pale into insignificance compared to the damage caused by alcohol abuse for example. Personally I'm not much bothered by it, the UK is built on an inclusive multi-cultural bedrock, and it *should* remain so. I haven't come across anyone making a big fuss about that who *is not* a racist. Clue for you : Having a Jewish Grandmother who died in the Holocaust does not automatically absolve you of racisim (take note Michael Howard). The Conservatives started that ball rolling and Labour are pushing it along. Oddly under Labour manufacturing actually *increased* it's output, not reduced. Facts and figures help. Rover amounted to a net-loss on the Import/Export balance sheet for many years. The Conservatives killed Matrix-Churchill, who were in fact a net-gain on the Import/Export balance sheet. Go figure that one out. So what are the Conservatives going to do about it ? Get on their hands and knees and mop the Hospital floors ? Somehow I don't think so, they will just punt ambiguous slogans without any policies to back them up. The Tories haven't done anything but meekly go along with Labour, their pissing and moaning with zero policy committments to back it up just doesn't cut the mustard quite frankly. Apparently crime is down, but violent crime is up. No surprises there. Blair would argue that the prison population has grown because his policies have helped the Police force do it's job. As for the "studies", they were shown to be bollocks. Here's a stat for you : You are over 1000 times more likely to be shot dead in the US than you are in the UK. Those studies were a pointless bullet point IMO, think about it. ![]() The Tories are basically Labour but without any policies whatsoever, they are not an electable option. The Liberals are the only option IMO. Labour and Tories have made a mockery of Democracy over the last 30 years, it's time they were told where to go. Cheers, B00ng. |
|
Originally Posted by FredC
Thank you for that DB. I can't be assed anymore about doing Carrera in, because he's the biggest tw@ on this board by miles. Now then our 'merkin frien's what DB wrote was the factual truth and good composition and writing skills also.
If Carrera's darling Margaret Thatcher and Michael Howard hadn't closed all the Mental Hospitals down then Carrera would still be in one. Here's a good one. When MH was Home Secretary (police, prisons, security etc.) A pregnant woman prisoner who was about to go into labour and give birth was handcuffed to the cot. 'Tough on crime, tough on punishment was his motto'. |
|
Originally Posted by Carrera
I recall that story quite well. But let's not forget a woman has just been jailed for losing her marbles and firing a pellet gun at the feet of some hooligans who were vandalising her car for the umpteenth time. O.K. what she did was very stupid but the woman had clearly been driven to her wits end. So, Blair frees the vandals and jails the householder. Last I heard she went on hunger strike.
I'm not actually a Tory but I think the country has declined massively under Blair and that Blair is essentially a weak leader who can't take a stand. He basically does what he's told and jumps to the tune of Bush or France. My guess is that voting for Howard or even the Lib Dems would at least wipe the smirk off Blair's visage. Any one of the two could be an improvement. |