On 26 Apr 2004 22:56:16 GMT,
[email protected] (Jan) wrote:
>From: W_B [email protected]
>
>>Damn shame that jd didn't succumb.
>
>Wishing others dead comes from Satan
I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral neuropathy
and
migraine headaches.
Jan
>
>>That alone should disprove her claims
>>of being a victim of poisoning of any kind.
>
>You are most desperate to disprove claims. Amalgams can and DO cause mercury
>poisoning. Denying it doesn't change that.
Jan Drew, repeatedly posts how she almost died of mercury poisoning
and that removal of the amalgams saved her life.
But what are the *real* facts??
Fact 1: On March 4, 1999 Jan reported that she was feeling pretty good
after having a parasite cleanse and she said that she thought
parasites were the cause of all her problems. She said that her foot
pain was gone (soon to come back).
Fact 2: On June 17, 1999 Jan reports that she could barely sit up due
to mercury poisoning.
Fact 3: On June 19, 1999 within hours of having eight amalgams removed
(over two days) Jan reports that she feels better than she has in two
years.
Fact 4: When Jan is confronted about this rapid improvement and how it
could not be due to mercury level dropping Jan says that she *never*
said it was the mercury dropping and admitted that it was due to
"relief" that she had finished the dental work and had paid the bill.
Fact 5: Jan did *not* finish the dental work on June 19, 1999 when she
claimed she did.
IN fact it would not be completed until July 11, 1999!! Lie number
ONE.
Fact 6: Jan posted to sci.med.dentistry that she knew it was the
mercury because she did not begin to regain her health until *after*
her mercury level dropped. Lie number TWO.
Fact 7: On June 26, 1999 Jan posted to mha that she was able to go out
line dancing and all the pain in her feet was gone because she was not
getting a daily dose of mercury. But the truth is that Jan still had
more amalgams to be removed and she *was* getting a daily dose of
mercury (not to mention the huge dose she got during the removal
process). Lie number THREE.
Fact 8: Jan does not refute *any* of the above nor can she reconcile
her contradictory statements.
Fact 9: Jan repeatedly says that I lied about her amalgam history. Lie
number FOUR.
Fact 10: Jan accuses me of lying when I said that she felt better than
she had in years within hours of having amalgams removed. She says I
lied because I did not say *two years*. Lie number FIVE.
Fact 11: Jan accuses me of lying when I said that she felt better than
she had in two years and again accused me of lying because of what I
was "implying". Lie number SIX
Fact 12: Jan accuses me of lying and trying to change her story when I
mistakenly posted January instead of June. Lie number SEVEN.
Fact 13: Jan is a psychopathic liar, bigot, antisemite and generally
hateful person who continues to bear false witness against those who
expose her lies.
Fact 14: All the above are true and proven by Jan's own words.
That's a wrap.
PS: Jan is sure to start a new message attacking me instead of
admitting that she is a liar and a bigot. She certainly will not
refute any of the FACTS that I have detailed above. She cannot refute
the facts since they are ALL PROVEN WITH JAN'S OWN WORDS!!! Just
watch.
>
>
>Muslims call Jd an 'Infidel' !
>
>Lie # 1 Muslims don't know JD.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
>
>
>The fact is, so do Christians.
>
>Lie # 2. This is NOT a fact, quite the opposite.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
>
>
>Ja|\|Dre\/\/ is a demon, and
>the scourge of the human race.
>
>Hate is rampant among organized medicine and dentistry and the *gang*.
I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral neuropathy
and
migraine headaches.
Jan
>
>They who remove the evil demon(s)
>are destined to be blessed.
>
>Lie # 3. There are no demons to be removed.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
>
What was that Jan was saying about others transferring their
weaknesses to others?? Poor Jan.
Aloha,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance
