Announcing The Two Foot Diet (2FD)!



S

Steve

Guest
Many of you have been tempted to try Dr. Chung's Amazing Weight Defying
Two Pound Diet but the idea of carrying a scale around has scared you
off... that's why I have developed the Two Foot Diet!

In 2003, my wife and I watched an IMAX film about climbing the Bavarian
Alps and learned that despite their exhausting regimen, the climbers
consumed only 10 packages of wieners per week. That's less than 2 feet
of wieners per day! Since none of the climbers died from starvation, I
think it is safe to assume that 2 feet of food per day should be more
than adequate for us non-climbing folks.

So I started a little experiment with the agreeable obese friends in my
neighborhood. I gave them ordinary 6 inch rulers with instructions to
measure the length of everything substantial that passed into their
mouths. The only things exempted were water and sugar-free drinks. What
I learned was that my obese friends were consuming between 8 to 12 feet
of food per day! At the time, I was about 10 lbs. over my ideal body
weight so I decided to find out how much I was eating per day... 3
feet. I cut back to less than 2 feet and was at my proper weight in one
month.

My friends have responded similarly except they have taken longer
because of having to lose more weight. Admittedly, some of my obese
friends were especially slow to respond. They also happen to be the
ones with an unfortunate propensity for accidentally loosing their 6
inch rulers and taking weeks to buy replacements.

So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
thumb to measure.

I am making this diet available as a public service and without
compensation.

If you have any questions, just see Dr. Chung's helpful FAQ and
substitute "Two Feet" for "Two Pounds" everywhere... what could be
simpler?

God's Humble Servant,

Steve
 
Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:

>So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>thumb to measure.

This is patently absurd!

And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in a
two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.

Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)

This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:34:29 -0500, Jim Chinnis wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
>> So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>> dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>> That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>> Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>> thumb to measure.
>
> This is patently absurd!

That cannot be... I have been blessed with Truth Discernment.

>
> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in
> a
> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>
> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>
> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.


Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet, Jim?

God's Humble Servant,

Steve
 
Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:

>Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet, Jim?
>
>God's Humble Servant,

You win! LOL
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
Jim Chinnis wrote:

> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
>>So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>>dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>>That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>>Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>>thumb to measure.

> This is patently absurd!
>
> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in a
> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>
> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>
> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.

You two are all wet in your obviously flawed diets. Even though you
live just up the road from me, I'm afraid I have to set you right.
Both of your dietary approaches are one-size-fits-all plans with all
the potential hazards built in. And, they make people measure things
which we know guarantees failure. Plus, you're trying to make money
from it with your optional sales. I've worked out an approach that
automatically takes into account the size of the person doing it.

The Two-Handful diet.

You may eat two complete handfuls each day. That way, larger people
with bigger hands get what they need and small people, whose hands are
ingeniously regulating their intake, will get what they need.

Couldn't be simpler. Thousands of people have done it and not one has
failed on it. Everybody from supermodels to world-class athletes,
POW's and delicate Starbucks barristas androgenously named Cameron and
Westleigh with multiple piercings do it. Check out
http:\\twohands.no.seriously.I.really.mean.it.com

Pastorio

> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:24:20 -0500, Bob Pastorio wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Jim Chinnis wrote:
>
>> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>>
>>> So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>>> dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>>> That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>>> Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>>> thumb to measure.
>
>> This is patently absurd!
>>
>> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used
>> in a
>> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do
>> with a
>> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>>
>> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day,
>> you
>> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
>> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>>
>> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
>> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
>
> You two are all wet in your obviously flawed diets.

Do you think that is wise, Mr. Pastorio?

> Even though you
> live just up the road from me, I'm afraid I have to set you right.

Sorry. Already right.

> Both of your dietary approaches are one-size-fits-all plans with all
> the potential hazards built in.

Why do you focus on hazards?

> And, they make people measure things

"He that spineth the wheel also measures the mote"

> which we know guarantees failure.

Sorry. Hundreds of people have succedded on the Two Foot Diet. I
would give you their names, but ethically I can't.

>Plus, you're trying to make money
> from it with your optional sales. I've worked out an approach that
> automatically takes into account the size of the person doing it.

Sounds like your raft is sinking.


> The Two-Handful diet.

"More than a handful is wasted" (Esakiah)

Why are you advocating waste?


> You may eat two complete handfuls each day. That way, larger people
> with bigger hands get what they need and small people, whose hands are
> ingeniously regulating their intake, will get what they need.

Galloshes 9:24 says:

"9He that takes what he wants gets what he needs. 10Thus spake
Zarathustra."

And in Stones 15:16 it says:

"15You may not get what you want. But if you try some time, you just
might find. 16You get what you need"


> Couldn't be simpler. Thousands of people have done it and not one has
> failed on it. Everybody from supermodels to world-class athletes,
> POW's and delicate Starbucks barristas androgenously named Cameron and
> Westleigh with multiple piercings do it. Check out
> http:\\twohands.no.seriously.I.really.mean.it.com

Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet, Mr. Pastorio?

You have my pity.

--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
Steve wrote:

> <hissing snipped>

Sounds like you have foot in mouth disease.

You have my pity.

This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate this Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a
Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He
touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every
perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument
soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this and
other discussion threads.

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s),
certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach
toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit
the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including
jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or
its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to participate here on Usenet above the din of
hissing from the peanut gallery.


Sincerely,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
Steve wrote:

> God's Humble Servant,
>
> Steve

Do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
Jim Chinnis wrote:

> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
> >So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
> >dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
> >That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
> >Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
> >thumb to measure.
>
> This is patently absurd!
>
> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in a
> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>
> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>
> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
> --
> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

For a fee, our friendly neighborhood bariatric surgeons can implement the same
effect by stapling your stomach.

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
Jim Chinnis wrote:

> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
> >Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet, Jim?
> >
> >God's Humble Servant,
>
> You win! LOL
> --
> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

He's lost.

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:19:31 GMT in article
<[email protected]> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung,
MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Steve wrote:
>
>> God's Humble Servant,
>>
>> Steve
>
>Do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?

Off-topic, irrelevant, and it's none of your business.


--
Matti Narkia
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:22:35 -0500, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Jim Chinnis wrote:
>
>> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>>
>>> Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet, Jim?
>>>
>>> God's Humble Servant,
>>
>> You win! LOL
>> --
>> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
>

< Jealous Hissing by Chung Snipped>

You have my pity.

--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:19:31 -0500, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Steve wrote:
>
>> God's Humble Servant,
>>
>> Steve
>
> Do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?
>

Why do you hate the Two Foot Diet?

--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:34:20 -0500, Matti Narkia wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:19:31 GMT in article
> <[email protected]> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung,
> MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Steve wrote:
>>
>>> God's Humble Servant,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>
>> Do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?
>
> Off-topic, irrelevant, and it's none of your business.
>

But he has my pity. I am going to dust off my feet.


--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:14:26 -0500, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

<Jealous Hissing by Chung Snipped>

This discussion(s) is related to the Two Foot Diet approach (2FD) which
is described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
(Just substitute "Foot" for "Pound")

Though Steve invented this approach, he did not initiate this Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been
voluntary and has been conducted in the spirit of community service.
His motivation has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his
religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to
better the health of folks He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/hypocrite.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are
vehemently opposed to the 2 foot diet approach. They have debated
Steve on every perceived weakness of the 2 foot diet approach and have
lost the argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp
(Just substitute "Foot" for "Pound")

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this and
other discussion threads.

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the
argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 foot
diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you
can not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll"
is someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no
redeeming discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting
"flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Steve has not been posting anonymously.

(2) The 2FD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting
the discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2FD
to achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/moreChungbullshit

(3) Steve did not start the discussion(s).

(4) The 2 foot diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Steve's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Dr. Chung.

When the full light was cast on Dr. Chung's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity, most notably Mu,
only hissed louder in support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they
are, using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/sign_up_to_be_a_patient.asp

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning
the anon posters who continue to hiss, most notably Mu:

(1) They are anonymous and thus expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).

(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.

(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.

(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Steve by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the
2FD or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.
Unfortunately, they keep Mu_Tating so that it is impossible to killfile
them.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to
speed.

It will remain my pleasure to participate here on Usenet above the din
of hissing from the peanut gallery.


--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote in part:

>Jim Chinnis wrote:
>
>> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>>
>> >So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>> >dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>> >That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>> >Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>> >thumb to measure.
>>
>> This is patently absurd!
>>
>> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in a
>> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
>> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>>
>> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
>> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
>> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>>
>> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
>> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
>> --
>> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
>
>For a fee, our friendly neighborhood bariatric surgeons can implement the same
>effect by stapling your stomach.

There ya go! But my product is less painful.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
 
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:14:26 GMT in article
<[email protected]> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung,
MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s),
>certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach
>toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit
>the message then try to discredit the messenger."
>
>Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
>someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
>discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.
>
>These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
>following observations were made:
>
>(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
>(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
>discussion(s).
> (a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
>achieve near-ideal weight.
> (b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
>weight becomes near-ideal.
> (c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc
>(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
>(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
>(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including
>jpegs of the actual diplomas).
>
>Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
>tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
>attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:
>
>http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp
>
>When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
>hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
>support of their fallen hero.
>
>Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
>actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
>using the on-line third-party resources at:
>
>http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp
>
>where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
>claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.
>
>Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
>anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):
>
>(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
>accountability).
>(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
>characters.
>(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
>one-sided insults.
>(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
>cross-posting.
>(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or
>its author.
>
>and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.
>
>It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.
>
>It will remain my pleasure to participate here on Usenet above the din of
>hissing from the peanut gallery.
>
This is insane. Or great comedy. If not comedy, I'm beginning to understand
why Chung got fired from that hospital, as they say. If this is not comedy,
he would be fired from every hospital in every country.

--
Matti Narkia
 
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:01:57 -0500, Jim Chinnis wrote
(in message <[email protected]>):

> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
>> Jim Chinnis wrote:
>>
>>> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>>>
>>>> So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
>>>> dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
>>>> That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
>>>> Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
>>>> thumb to measure.
>>>
>>> This is patently absurd!
>>>
>>> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used
>>> in a
>>> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do
>>> with a
>>> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
>>>
>>> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day,
>>> you
>>> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
>>> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
>>>
>>> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
>>> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
>>> --
>>> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
>>
>> For a fee, our friendly neighborhood bariatric surgeons can implement the
>> same
>> effect by stapling your stomach.
>
> There ya go! But my product is less painful.

Pain builds character.

--
God's Other Humble Servant

Steve
 
Matti Narkia wrote:

> Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:19:31 GMT in article
> <[email protected]> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung,
> MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Steve wrote:
> >
> >> God's Humble Servant,
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> >Do you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?
>
> Off-topic, irrelevant, and it's none of your business.
>

Yet another raw nerve.

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
Jim Chinnis wrote:

> "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email protected]> wrote in part:
>
> >Jim Chinnis wrote:
> >
> >> Steve <[email protected]> wrote in part:
> >>
> >> >So here's the deal: measure all the food you eat, using it's longest
> >> >dimension, and keep the total length to less than two feet per day.
> >> >That's all there is. No scales, no counting calories or carbohydrates.
> >> >Heck, if you loose your ruler, you can even use the first joint of your
> >> >thumb to measure.
> >>
> >> This is patently absurd!
> >>
> >> And speaking of patents, I've applied for a patent on a device to be used in a
> >> two-liter diet (or two-quart for the metric-challenged who can just do with a
> >> bit less). The device is a plastic bag of 2 liter capacity.
> >>
> >> Each day, you simply fill the bag with whatever you want. During the day, you
> >> simply eat from the bag. (As an option, I offer a strap that fits over the
> >> head and neck and holds the bag to permit 24-hour grazing.)
> >>
> >> This approach properly accounts for shape of items, unlike your baseless
> >> approach that employs catanation via lineal dimensional dominance.
> >> --
> >> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
> >
> >For a fee, our friendly neighborhood bariatric surgeons can implement the same
> >effect by stapling your stomach.
>
> There ya go! But my product is less painful.

It is :)

Steve's two feet in his mouth method comes close though ;-)

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back