ghostgum wrote:
> But the rules for 0.05% only apply to drivers of a motor vehicle. So
> they would have to use some other traffic infringement such as not
> being in control of the vehicle (i.e. same sort of rule you would use
> for a horse rider).
> Here is one person's view of the road rules:
> http://www.whitehorsecyclists.org.au/roadrules.pdf
I caught this mid-thread, so don't know the context (state) for which the
original poster was asking about.
The generic answer would be "it depends". There have been several
statements in this thread that apply or don't apply to NSW (where I am) and it
does indeed appear to be different for different states.
In case of NSW, no blood alcohol "limit" applies as such, but if you're
visibly affected, you WILL get booked.
However, even if you were "blind stupid punch blotto I don't know what
planet I was on" drunk, you can still legally get on your bike the next day
and they can't do a damn thing about it. You can legally walk your bike home.
Speeding. You will get booked as per normal, but no points apply, only
fines. As above, you could be doing a "million points and take away the
licence forever" speed over the limit, and the most they can do is fine you.
You can still continue to ride home. Legally.
If you have no ID, they'll give the speil of "if we find out you gave us
false information, you'll get fined for the original infringement, plus the
false information fine". They have to find you first of course.
This doesn't happen often on the road, because it just doesn't happen, but
on our railways, where "no IDs" are rife, a report indicated about 50% of the
names given are false.
Not that I'm condoning anyone take advantage of the loopholes in our lovely
laws, but one can think of it as a "payback scheme" for all the ********
drivers we have to deal with on the road.
--
Linux Registered User # 302622
<http://counter.li.org>