Re: What is it with Giant?
Harng Goh wrote:
> Bleve wrote:
>> PiledHigher wrote:
>>> Bleve wrote:
>>>> Damian wrote:
>>>>> If Bleve owned a 4 Giants instead of 4 Treks, we'd probably be having
>>>>> this same thread with different names
>>>> No way! I'd be sure to see reason
>>> Bleve, you've earned yourself a spray!
>> some of those people need to get some perspective.
> haha...holy cr/\p, that was a quite a tirade...
> As for the misattributed Toyota comparison, I hope I don't cope any
> flak for that. Besides being misattributed, it also seems to have been
> misinterpreted. I'm not saying that the high-end Giant bikes are POS,
> in the same way that I'm not saying Toyota cars (or Lexus, for that
> matter) are POS. For those cyclists who don't want to have the same
> bike as every other person on the road, they won't be buying a Giant or
> a Camry. My point was not about quality.
While the tirade is apparently in response to a perceived injustice to
the bicycle industry, it's interesting to note that the author works for
a LBS that sells... tada... Giant!
.... and he calls you a "...know nothing jackass..." Bleve!? From what I
can tell you know plenty! :-)
I have to respond to the following quote however:
"“Bleve”, should be helping to build and grow the image of bicycle
Clearly Phillip (Hi... you're probably now watching this thread in
earnest) you haven't been around aus.bicycle for long.
Remove "yourfinger" before replying