Re: What is it with Giant?
Harng Goh wrote:
> Bleve wrote:
>
>> PiledHigher wrote:
>>> Bleve wrote:
>>>> Damian wrote:
>>>>> If Bleve owned a 4 Giants instead of 4 Treks, we'd probably be having
>>>>> this same thread with different names 
>>>> No way! I'd be sure to see reason 
>>> Bleve, you've earned yourself a spray!
>>> http://www.spinopsys.com/archives/682
>> some of those people need to get some perspective.
>
> haha...holy cr/\p, that was a quite a tirade...
>
> As for the misattributed Toyota comparison, I hope I don't cope any
> flak for that. Besides being misattributed, it also seems to have been
> misinterpreted. I'm not saying that the high-end Giant bikes are POS,
> in the same way that I'm not saying Toyota cars (or Lexus, for that
> matter) are POS. For those cyclists who don't want to have the same
> bike as every other person on the road, they won't be buying a Giant or
> a Camry. My point was not about quality.
>
While the tirade is apparently in response to a perceived injustice to
the bicycle industry, it's interesting to note that the author works for
a LBS that sells... tada... Giant!
.... and he calls you a "...know nothing jackass..." Bleve!? From what I
can tell you know plenty! :-)
I have to respond to the following quote however:
"“Bleve”, should be helping to build and grow the image of bicycle
retail..."
Clearly Phillip (Hi... you're probably now watching this thread in
earnest) you haven't been around aus.bicycle for long.
--
Bean
Remove "yourfinger" before replying