This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000603030801070500060709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last week, plus a nice additional
bit. Elaine K
Fred wrote:
>I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make
>sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....
>
>(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)
>
>DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8
>
>I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
>anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
>by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
>last night.
>
>May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.
>
>Fred
>219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
>
>On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results
>>
>>..............
>>
>>
>
>
>
--------------000603030801070500060709 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-
Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-
Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000"
bgcolor="#ffffff"> Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last week, plus
a nice additional bit.<br> Elaine K<br> <br> Fred wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite"
cite="
[email protected]"> <pre wrap="">I was shocked but it is
explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make sense but then again.
But without further ado or maybe just a bit....
(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)
DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8
I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.
May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.
Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="
mailto:[email protected]"><
[email protected]></a> wrote:
</pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for
the results
.............. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>
--------------000603030801070500060709--