![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am thinking of trying to ride around the SF Bay, in a
couple of stages, taking advantage of the new bike path over the Carquinez bridge. Does anyone know a nice route for the northern part between the Carquinez bridge and the Golden Gate? Or can anyone refer me to good maps of that area? I recall seeing a post about this somewhere but I can't find it. I am also wondering whether one should go clockwise or counterclockwise. I am thinking the latter might be easier with the prevailing wind patterns, but maybe that's nonsense. I am also debating whether it would be cheating to go over the Dumbarton bridge. Thanks for any help, - Michael. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In ba.bicycles Michael Hutchings <hutching@math.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I am thinking of trying to ride around the SF Bay, in a > couple of stages, taking advantage of the new bike path > over the Carquinez bridge. Does anyone know a nice route > for the northern part between the Carquinez bridge and the > Golden Gate? Or can anyone refer me to good maps of that > area? I recall seeing a post about this somewhere but I > can't find it. The Krebs cycling maps are the definitive cycling maps for Northern California. AAA also does a respectable job with their regional maps, although they include less bike-specific detail (e.g. road steepness, food/water availability, etc.), and they don't usually include bike paths. The problem is how to get from Novato to Vallejo or vice- versa. The most direct route is on CA37. The road is essentially flat and the shoulder good, but the two bridges over the Petaluma River and the Napa Slough have no shoulder. The bridge over the Napa River is high, but has a decently-wide shoulder, although a rather low railing. There was some discussion of this route a couple of months ago on this forum. The nearest alternative route is CA12 to the north. While this route is somewhat more topographically interesting, it has heavy traffic and narrow shoulders. Other routes are even further to the north and more out of the way for an "around the bay" type ride. Before the new Carquinez bike path opened, one needed to ride east to Rio Vista (CA12) and Antioch (CA160) to complete a circumnavigation of the greater bay (SF, San Pablo, and Suisun). It's now a bit late this year to see the area at its best, but the route through American Canyon, Suisun City, Birds Landing and the Montezuma Hills to Rio Vista is worthwhile. While in Rio Vista don't forget to visit Foster's Bighorn on Main St. and see the appalling (or amazing, depending on your point of view) collection of stuffed animal heads. > I am also wondering whether one should go clockwise or > counterclockwise. I am thinking the latter might be easier > with the prevailing wind patterns, but maybe that's > nonsense. If you want to avoid headwinds and enjoy tailwinds, plan your route to take to the hills when you're riding toward the west or northwest and to ride closer to the bay when you're riding east or southeast. This assumes the prevailing winds are from the west and northwest. I find bay area winds are stronger and more consistent near the bay or on flat terrain than they are in the hills. > I am also debating whether it would be cheating to go over > the Dumbarton bridge. Depends on how you define cheating. If you cross the Dumbarton, you might cheat yourself out of enjoying Calaveras Rd. -- Bill Bushnell |
|
|