![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yum wrote:
> > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? I have two of the low-end eTrex and am constantly entertained by them in breadcrumb-dropping display (different scales). I have two because a temporary repair of one with electrical tape and a balled-up packing peanut is surprisingly permanent, as a button replacement. Breadcrumb-dropping makes its own local map, which changes constantly, if you repeat a route. One of them has waypoints dropped at intersections, and that has to be the local scale display; the other has only major waypoints like home and common destinations, on the large- area display scale. It's always amazing to come up on an unbreadcrumbed waypoint in the middle of nowhere, crossing some route that has long since disappeared. -- Ron Hardin rhhardin@mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <iZOdndnSGOpsYlrdRVn-hw@comcast.com>,
Yum@hotmail.com says... > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? > I think it depends on how you tour. I tend to plan my tours in advance fairly carefully using topo maps. For that I use a small basic hiking type GPS without basemaps. I plan waypoints and routes using OziExplorer and topo maps on the PC, then use that package to send the routes and waypoints to the GPS. If you want more flexibility enroute, then you need to take a PDA loaded with maps with a GPS attached, or take a GPS loaded with maps (I'm a bit out of date, but I'm not aware of any GPS units with altitude data built in, which I feel is almost essential for a cycle tour, hence the suggestion of the PDA with topo maps and attached GPS. That is my next project, a HP 2210 with OziExplorer CE for a moving map topo display. I will attach my existing small Garmin GPS so that I don't need to run the PDA all the time - no power socket on the bike!) Bruce Graham |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Yum" <Yum@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<iZOdndnSGOpsYlrdRVn-hw@comcast.com>...
> Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? I use Magellan Meridian Platinum but many will do the job just fine. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 2,778
|
Quote:
Garmin 60C 0r 60CS are worth a look. They have a handlebar mount available. The level of detail and working with the available memory and how Garmin has you select the segments will determine if they will work for you. If you have support, a PC traveling along, easy way to recharge batteries; then 60C/CS is great.
__________________
David Ornee, Western Springs, IL USA |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Ron Hardin" <rhhardin@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:40C82132.CFC@mindspring.com... > Yum wrote: > > > > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? > > I have two of the low-end eTrex and am constantly > entertained by them in breadcrumb-dropping display > (different scales). > > I have two because a temporary repair of one with > electrical tape and a balled-up packing peanut is > surprisingly permanent, as a button replacement. > > Breadcrumb-dropping makes its own local map, which changes > constantly, if you repeat a route. > > One of them has waypoints dropped at intersections, and > that has to be the local scale display; the other has only > major waypoints like home and common destinations, on the > large-area display scale. > > It's always amazing to come up on an unbreadcrumbed > waypoint in the middle of nowhere, crossing some route > that has long since disappeared. I don't get it. Can you please explain "breadcrumb- dropping"? Thanks, Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> I don't get it. Can you please explain "breadcrumb-
> dropping"? > > Thanks, > > Kyle It's a tracklog. The gps automatically records where you been. You can also save tracklogs and use them to navigate with. -- Pete Rissler http://web1.greatbasin.net/~rissler/ http://www.tccycling.com |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
I second the Magellan. I don't have a platinum tho, the standard meridian does just fine for me and I've loaded the topo maps and download the tracks to both mapsend topo and delorme topo 4 for post ride analysis of terrain. ( I use it to calculate the total climbing distance and total elevation climbed during my ride.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bruce Graham <jbgraham@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message news:<MPG.1b32d9bab8987c6989711@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> In article <iZOdndnSGOpsYlrdRVn-hw@comcast.com>, > Yum@hotmail.com says... > > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? > > > I think it depends on how you tour. I tend to plan my > tours in advance fairly carefully using topo maps. For > that I use a small basic hiking type GPS without > basemaps. I plan waypoints and routes using OziExplorer > and topo maps on the PC, then use that package to send > the routes and waypoints to the GPS. If you want more > flexibility enroute, then you need to take a PDA loaded > with maps with a GPS attached, or take a GPS loaded with > maps (I'm a bit out of date, but I'm not aware of any GPS > units with altitude data built in, which I feel is almost > essential for a cycle tour, hence the suggestion of the > PDA with topo maps and attached GPS. That is my next > project, a HP 2210 with OziExplorer CE for a moving map > topo display. I will attach my existing small Garmin GPS > so that I don't need to run the PDA all the time - no > power socket on the bike!) > Your experience/information is at least a few years out of date. There have been small GPS units with built-in compensating barometric altimeters for at least 3-4 years now. And they can accept downloadable topographic maps. I have a Garmin eTrex Vista and it has these features and that model has been around for over 3 years. There are newer models with more memory, larger displays, color displays, etc. available with the same features. And they are much more rugged and waterproof than your PDA. My Vista has been through torrential downpours without even a hiccup. My Legend, essentially the same but less memory and no altimeter, survive a hit-and-run that left me with two broken arms and much of the left side of my face and both knees scraped off on the pavement. I used the Legend for touring Italy two years ago, and for the Pacific coast last fall. The Vista will be with me in the Dolomites, Alps, and lakes of Lombardia starting next week; the map set for that region and routes are already downloaded into the unit. BTW, some balk at the cost of the downloadable Garmin mapsets, but it is no more than the registration cost for the full- feature version of OziExplorer so I do not buy the argument. - rick |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<bc2b2f85.0406100959.1f085ffc@posting.google.com>, rickwarner@earthlink.net says... > Bruce Graham <jbgraham@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message > news:<MPG.1b32d9bab8987c6989711@news.optusnet.com.au>... > > In article <iZOdndnSGOpsYlrdRVn-hw@comcast.com>, > > Yum@hotmail.com says... > > > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? > > > > > I think it depends on how you tour. I tend to plan my > > tours in advance fairly carefully using topo maps. For > > that I use a small basic hiking type GPS without > > basemaps. I plan waypoints and routes using OziExplorer > > and topo maps on the PC, then use that package to send > > the routes and waypoints to the GPS. If you want more > > flexibility enroute, then you need to take a PDA loaded > > with maps with a GPS attached, or take a GPS loaded with > > maps (I'm a bit out of date, but I'm not aware of any > > GPS units with altitude data built in, which I feel is > > almost essential for a cycle tour, hence the suggestion > > of the PDA with topo maps and attached GPS. That is my > > next project, a HP 2210 with OziExplorer CE for a moving > > map topo display. I will attach my existing small Garmin > > GPS so that I don't need to run the PDA all the time - > > no power socket on the bike!) > > > > Your experience/information is at least a few years out of > date. There have been small GPS units with built-in > compensating barometric altimeters for at least 3-4 years > now. And they can accept downloadable topographic maps. I > have a Garmin eTrex Vista and it has these features and > that model has been around for over 3 years. There are > newer models with more memory, larger displays, color > displays, etc. available with the same features. And they > are much more rugged and waterproof than your PDA. My > Vista has been through torrential downpours without even a > hiccup. My Legend, essentially the same but less memory > and no altimeter, survive a hit-and-run that left me with > two broken arms and much of the left side of my face and > both knees scraped off on the pavement. I used the Legend > for touring Italy two years ago, and for the Pacific coast > last fall. The Vista will be with me in the Dolomites, > Alps, and lakes of Lombardia starting next week; the map > set for that region and routes are already downloaded into > the unit. BTW, some balk at the cost of the downloadable > Garmin mapsets, but it is no more than the registration > cost for the full-feature version of OziExplorer so I do > not buy the argument. > > - rick > I should have mentioned that I'm in Australia and the last time I looked I could not get topo maps for a Garmin (such as your Vista) for this area. When they are available I will go that way (and I had forgotten they have been available for the US for a long time). My current set up is about five years old. A Garmin GPS12 (heavy and limited by today's standards) and an early version of OziExplorer with free upgrades and the Auslig or other raster topo maps. Sounds like you have a great trip coming up. Only time I had a French tour (2001) I had to use scanned Michelin maps. The only topo information was little chevrons showing the steep grades. Bruce |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I use a Garmin ETrex, buttttttt I just put a wireless bike
computer on my bike and if I turn on my GPS the bike computer will show 0 and does not work. As soon as I turn the GPS off the bike computer starts to work again. Does anyone else have this problem? |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had that problem if I placed the bike computer right
next to the Garmin Etrex Venture. But when I placed them on opposite sides of the stem it went away. BTW, I love my GPS. Gary Mark wrote: > I use a Garmin ETrex, buttttttt I just put a wireless bike > computer on my bike and if I turn on my GPS the bike > computer will show 0 and does not work. As soon as I turn > the GPS off the bike computer starts to work again. Does > anyone else have this problem? |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yum wrote:
> Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? > > I started a thread on this awhile back in rec.bicycles.misc. This URL should have it: http://tinyurl.com/ywayf |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is GPS without map still useful for the purpose of
navigation ? Can it replace cue sheet ? Yes, I realize the map feature is very attractive, but a GPS unit, map software, handle bar mount add up to almost $400. I just wonder how useful are GPS units like Foretrex or Geko that don't support map. Another questions is how detail are those maps you can use on handheld unit ? Are the comparable to MS S&T ? I am new to GPS and never owned myself. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Yum" <Yum@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iZOdndnSGOpsYlrdRVn-hw@comcast.com... > Which GPS do you recommend for bike touring ? I've used GPS on significant bike tours for many years. Mainly for fun and technical interest, but there are some real advantages to using one. Started with a Garmin 12CX, went to an ETrex when the 12CX got lost, now I'm using an ETrex Legend. I don't think there's a better model for cycling than one of the versions of ETrex. I think having the base map is a useful feature, but they're never at a scale that has been really useful for finding roads. Knowing which direction you're heading is very useful, but you can get the same effect with a good compass. Having an accurate speedometer is a nice feature. Not dependent on wheel size or tyre wear. Something you can't set wrongly. Being able to make a waypoint and collect them is like mentally marking our your territory, but you can also do that with a map and some coloured pins if you really want to. Personally, I collect tracks and fragment them so that I can stitch a ride together out of the fragments and know how far and its profile exactly. Together with an accurate map, knowing where you are, and really knowing where you are, makes it all worthwhile for the comfort factor on a long and possibly remote ride. When the day's ride distance is near your comfort maximum, taking an unexpected detour can be the different between arriving in good time, or struggling in late and tired. The only time a GPS saved me was on the '99 PBP. I marked the 200km during the night on the way out of Paris. On the way back in I was so dead and disorientated, that I lost my way along with a number of other people. Because of the GPS trackback feature, I could see quickly I'd diverged from the track and could get back on my way with little incident. Without it, I might still be riding around lost in rural France, not that that's a bad thing in itself. Phillip |
|
|