Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Women's Cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


WSD vs Men's bikes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-06.-2004, 01:51 AM   #1
lleenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
Question WSD vs Men's bikes

I’m new to cycling and I’ve been riding an old road bike borrowed from a friend for a couple of months. I’ve enjoyed riding so much that I think it’s about time I got a bike of my own. My question for you is how many of you ride a wsd? Is there that much difference between a wsd and a regular bike? I am only 5 feet with an inseam 29in. I’m going to a bike shop tomorrow to get properly fitted, but I wanted some feedback before I went.

I’ve talked to a couple of guys at the shop and they seem to think there really isn’t too much difference between the 2. I don’t know if they’re saying that because they don’t have any wsd’s for me to test in the store and they would have to order it. Either way I’d love your input. Thanks in advance.

-Len
lleenn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-06.-2004, 10:47 AM   #2
cuervo
Registered User
 
cuervo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
Posts: 374
Default Re: WSD vs Men's bikes

Quote:
Originally posted by lleenn
I’m new to cycling and I’ve been riding an old road bike borrowed from a friend for a couple of months. I’ve enjoyed riding so much that I think it’s about time I got a bike of my own. My question for you is how many of you ride a wsd? Is there that much difference between a wsd and a regular bike? I am only 5 feet with an inseam 29in. I’m going to a bike shop tomorrow to get properly fitted, but I wanted some feedback before I went.

I’ve talked to a couple of guys at the shop and they seem to think there really isn’t too much difference between the 2. I don’t know if they’re saying that because they don’t have any wsd’s for me to test in the store and they would have to order it. Either way I’d love your input. Thanks in advance.

-Len


I don't know, I'm a man
__________________
Sorry, English is not my primary language.

Last edited by cuervo : 15-06.-2004 at 10:56 AM.
cuervo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-06.-2004, 07:15 AM   #3
mingcat9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 70
Default Re: WSD vs Men's bikes

I don't ride a wsd. I have a long torso.
But, at your height, you'd need shorter cranks. also, the wsd models have brakes that are eaiser to reach, which is a feature that is nice to have. The main difference, often is the lenght of the toptube in relation to the seat tube. also the most popular color for wsd models are periwinkle blue, which I personally find disgusting. perwinkle is a nice color for a bedroom or bathroom, but on a bike...it looks slow, much like how red cars and bikes look fast.

so, wsd models have pros and cons, it all depends on your body type and what you like!

But, if your bike shop insists that you need something you don't want, you may need to find a new shop.

there are two in my town, the first one that I went to steered me away from road racing bikes-- that they only had one or two of-- which is what I wanted, and towards a hybrid. I ended up not liking the hybrid and selling it to my mom to get a entry level racing bike--what I really wanted, at the other bike shop in town.
so, get what you like, and want, and can afford (that last one is the hardest, after a while! ) Good Luck!
mingcat9 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-06.-2004, 09:09 AM   #4
stella
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 62
Default

Hi Len,
First off, welcome to cycling forums. I am a short rider (just under 5'3")and have the same inseam as you. Good bikes for women our size: terry cycles (georgeanna terry, the founder is barely 5 ft tall and started to make frames, handlbars, etc. to fit smaller riders); bianchi-a few women I ride with are thrilled w/their bianchi. If you're like me, you will need handlebars w/a shallow reach and drop (found on bianchi and terry, not sure of other brands). My suggestion is to get a steel frame bike if you can. At our size aluminum has a harsh ride even w/carbon seatpost and fork (believe me...I tried!)

with all that said....go to a bike shop that will listen to you, measure you-not just your inseam but your thigh, arm length etc. You may have to pay for this-some shops will give you a deal on a pro-fit if you buy a bike from them.
test ride wsd and traditional frames. DO NOT shop at a bike shop that disregards your opinion....I've been both a consumer and an employee at bike shops-the average sized person does not have to think about handlebars w/a shorter reach and drop...for some women-WSD bicycles have made all the difference.

Hope this was helpful...if you need clarification-let me know! I rambled quite a bit!
stella is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06.-2004, 05:27 AM   #5
lleenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks for all the help. I went ahead and ordered a Trek 1500 WSD 47” frame from my bike shop. They had a 51” WSD and I test rode it and I loved it… just a little big, but other than that perfect. So I’m gonna try the 47” and see if rides just a little better. I did try a lot of the ‘men’s bikes’ and didn’t feel as good in them as the WSD’s. The shorter frame was a great plus on the wsd.

-Len
lleenn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-06.-2004, 05:50 AM   #6
stella
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 62
Default

that's great! the trek 1500 wsd I also heard good things about, on this forum, as a matter of fact. keep me posted as to how the 47cm feels. I ride a 49cm but it's not wsd (I have a longer torso and my bike has a 50cm top tube w/115 stem!).
stella is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2004, 10:16 AM   #7
lleenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
Default

Stella-

I will let you know how the 47” feels as soon as I get the bike. I’m really excited… I think I’m gonna love it. Thanks again for all the help.

-Len
lleenn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2004, 12:07 PM   #8
stella
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 62
Default

Len,

Sounds great! Talk to you soon,
Stella
stella is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-06.-2004, 11:09 PM   #9
SaraBikes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Default

HI,

I just bought a Trek 5200 WSD bike the first part of April and have ridden it about 1200 miles. I LOVE IT!!! I had been riding a custom Independent Fabrication Crown Jewel bike previous to this, and I thought it too was the very best bike. It wasn't a WSD bike, but it did have a shorter top tube. the IF bike is a Renyolds 853 light-weight steel, and the Trek is Carbon Fiber. The Carbon Fiber is so LIGHT!! The only thing I don't like about my Trek WSD bike is the color. Black with some grey/silver. I love the gorgeous blue of my IF bike. Oh well, the WSD Trek is so comfortable and speedy I'm accepting the color. I'm 5'4 with 30" inseam. I rode my IF bike 2,776 miles across the USA coast to coast in 2001, and it too was very comfortable because I had a terrific bicycle shop who knows how to fit you correctly on a bike. That is the NUMBER ONE thing, getting the right fit by people who KNOW how to fit roadies.
Sara
SaraBikes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-06.-2004, 03:23 AM   #10
caligurl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Default

i just bought a specialized dolce elite. i tried some other bikes.. but i have longer legs and shorter torso.. so the WSD was a much better fit.. i'm riding the 51 and i'm 5'2"

i like that the brakes are closer/smaller and the handle bars narrower (although a few of the men's bikes i tried for size had narrower handles bars.

i actually like the color of my bike.. the comp was nice too.. lighter almost silver (they call it dream) but i couldn't justify the extra money on top of all the accessories i needed and wanted for a first bike. heck.. if they had had the sport model (the 699 version) in my size.. i probably would have left the store with that!
caligurl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07.-2004, 06:24 AM   #11
mingcat9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SaraBikes
HI,

I just bought a Trek 5200 WSD bike the first part of April and have ridden it about 1200 miles. I LOVE IT!!! I had been riding a custom Independent Fabrication Crown Jewel bike previous to this, and I thought it too was the very best bike. It wasn't a WSD bike, but it did have a shorter top tube. the IF bike is a Renyolds 853 light-weight steel, and the Trek is Carbon Fiber. The Carbon Fiber is so LIGHT!! The only thing I don't like about my Trek WSD bike is the color. Black with some grey/silver. I love the gorgeous blue of my IF bike.
Sara

I think you could have ordered a special paint job on your trek. I was looking at some dream bikes online, and noticed that trek had a program to "custom" paint their high-end bikes. and I agree that the gray paint job isn't the most stunning.
mingcat9 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07.-2004, 11:53 AM   #12
SaraBikes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mingcat9
I think you could have ordered a special paint job on your trek. I was looking at some dream bikes online, and noticed that trek had a program to "custom" paint their high-end bikes. and I agree that the gray paint job isn't the most stunning.


Thanks for the input. I go on quite a few organized bike events and often the Trek manufacture is there with a van of all their bikes and company reps to answer any questions. I'll ask them next time about having my 5200 painted sometime and what that would entail.
Sara
SaraBikes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07.-2004, 03:35 AM   #13
lisazapato
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lleenn
Thanks for all the help. I went ahead and ordered a Trek 1500 WSD 47� frame from my bike shop. They had a 51� WSD and I test rode it and I loved it� just a little big, but other than that perfect. So I�m gonna try the 47� and see if rides just a little better. I did try a lot of the �men�s bikes� and didn�t feel as good in them as the WSD�s. The shorter frame was a great plus on the wsd.

-Len


thats great!! i got a 1500WSD too, and it fits like a glove. one thing that worked for me was the fact that i'm kind of narrow shouldered, and i noticed that on the men's bike my arms were spread kinda too wide apart. plus the seat felt amazing, and instead of being either scrunched in the torso with good leg extension or scrunched in the legs with good torso position, i got the best of both!

i tried the specialized dolce elite and liked that one too, but it was not enough better than the trek to warrant the extra 200 bucks.
lisazapato is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08.-2004, 04:47 PM   #14
Oran
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: sydney
Posts: 26
Unhappy Re: WSD vs Men's bikes

Quote:
Originally Posted by lisazapato
thats great!! i got a 1500WSD too, and it fits like a glove. one thing that worked for me was the fact that i'm kind of narrow shouldered, and i noticed that on the men's bike my arms were spread kinda too wide apart. plus the seat felt amazing, and instead of being either scrunched in the torso with good leg extension or scrunched in the legs with good torso position, i got the best of both!

i tried the specialized dolce elite and liked that one too, but it was not enough better than the trek to warrant the extra 200 bucks.



I also have a trek 2300WSD its a 51cm frame. I would like to ask the question about the wheels, do you have 650 or 700 wheels because I am thinking of getting a new bike made up for me with 700 wheels. I feel left out when I ride with a group and they all have bigger wheels and it makes me feel that they can cycle faster up hill. what is your view on this for all you girls out there with 650 wheels
Oran is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08.-2004, 07:29 PM   #15
SaraBikes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Thumbs up Re: WSD vs Men's bikes

The only time I feel "left out" is when I know in my bag I'm carrying a 650cm tire tube and if I have a flat, and god forbid two flats, all my riding buddies can't loan me one of their 700cm tubes! I too thought that the smaller wheels would make a difference on the climbs -- but to my surprise I find that my climbing has much improved and I'm zooming past riders now that before riding this bike I was being dropped on the hills. I'm really pleased with how much more power I have riding a bike that "fits" me perfectly. I know this has contributed to my better riding skills, strength and pedal power transfer to my legs.
Sara
SaraBikes is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet