![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
http://news.statesmanjournal.com/article.cfm?i=82706
Mountain bikers unite to oppose wilderness plan Expanding federal wilderness would block popular trails The Associated Press June 29, 2004 MOUNT HOOD - Many mountain bikers are opposing a plan that would nearly double the size of federal wilderness on Mount Hood because it would make it illegal to ride some popular trails. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said that his plan to add 160,000 acres of new wilderness in one of the nation's most visited urban forests will meet a growing demand for backcountry recreation. But Paul Thomasberg, 41, a bike racer from Bend, said mountain bikers "aren't feeling that love." With commercial logging on federal forests diminishing, mountain bikers are becoming the most vocal critics of proposals that restrict access to public lands. They claim that the Mount Hood wilderness expansion would shut them out of at least 100 miles of trails. That not only would crowd riders onto other trails, they said, it also would counter any aspiration Oregon has of becoming the next mountain-biking mecca. Mountain bikers are the first to admit that they lack the political clout of a Sierra Club or other conservation groups. But they're learning. Members of Oregon bike clubs have gone to at least three community meetings about Mount Hood's future. They have had two sessions with staff members for Wyden and Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore. Conservation groups also have met privately with mountain- biking representatives to see whether they can agree on a wilderness plan. However, there are varying opinions about Wyden's proposal within biking groups. "I think the threat on forests from development and logging are too great to stall over a few trails here and there," said Bonnie Lynch, 47, who started mountain biking six years ago. Other mountain bikers say that Congress should consider alternatives to wilderness that would protect the forest from logging but still allow mountain biking. "The bottom line is we're not against protection," said Douglas Van Zandt, 44, a member of the Columbia Area Mountain Biking Advocates. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jerry Bone Jr wrote:
> http://news.statesmanjournal.com/article.cfm?i=82706 > > Mountain bikers unite to oppose wilderness plan > > Expanding federal wilderness would block popular trails > > The Associated Press June 29, 2004 > > MOUNT HOOD - Many mountain bikers are opposing a plan that > would nearly double the size of federal wilderness on > Mount Hood because it would make it illegal to ride some > popular trails. > Yet more bogus proposed wilderness. This slope started back in the early 70s and it's getting steeper and slippier every year. > > Other mountain bikers say that Congress should consider > alternatives to wilderness that would protect the forest > from logging but still allow mountain biking. > Either that or quit banning non-motorized vehicles from wilderness. Greg -- Destroy your safe and happy lives Before it is too late The battles we fought were long and hard Just not to be consumed by rock'n'roll |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Longer article from yesterday's Oregroanian: (You will
> have to enter your zip code, 90210 is a good one) > > http://www.oregonlive.com/search/in...ase/front_page- /1088423781141770.xml?oregonian?fpfp > > http://tinyurl.com/2uo4j I wonder how much support for Wilderness there would be if hikers were banned. -- Pete Rissler |
|
|