![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Could you provide a link to that interview with Mary Enig
you mentioned? I use a little coconut oil, but even more shredded coconut, which is much less expensive (I buy 25 pound bags, then grind it down even more, and you can then add it to all kinds of things as a flavor enhancer). The way they get away with making ridiculous claims in epidemiological studies is by using selective endpoints. For example,I saw a TV commercial for one of the most common osteoporosis drugs, and they said that this drug increases bone mass. They did not say that it prevents more fractures than taking placebo, nor did they say that it increases bone density, which is the most important thing, to my knowledge. But because the “endpoint” was determined to be only bone mass, they get away with telling people how great their product is. This sort of thing is typical – going on all around us, all the time. There’s an interesting study I mentioned in one of the two recent posts about butter being beneficial to bone growth, whereas arachidonic acid’s metabolites are inhibitors. In the case of “saturated fat,” if you classify lard as a “saturated fat,” even though it’s only 39% SFAs and highly subject to free radical degradation (due to all the unsaturated fatty acids and no significant antioxidant content), and on top of that only concern yourself with whether a food lowers or raises either total serum cholesterol or LDL (and ignore the reality that only oxidized cholesterol is the problem, so you can have high cholesterol as long as it is not oxidized, and this seems to be the healthiest of all possible situations regarding one’s cholesterol) as your “endpoint” you can claim that “saturated fat” is unhealthy. Of course, they look stupid to those who have read the studies demonstrating how healthy people are who use fresh coconut as dietary staples, but most people are unaware of these studies – our great “science journalists” seem to have someone missed this point in their rush to tell us how great a new drug that extends the life of terminally-ill cancer patients two months (18 months instead of 16, though they don’t talk of the side- effects). – that’s a true story in Newsday newspaper a week or so ago – it was hailed by the scientist interviewed as a “major victory.” I’ll take a “loss” with coconut oil (that is, higher, but non-oxidized serum cholesterol levels) and let them have as many “victories” as they want, if that’s what they define as a victory. Here’s just one of the studies that discusses how dangerous arachidonic acid can be under normal conditions in your body, if you eat more than a small amount of omega 6 PUFAs: Cell Biochemistry and Function Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 97 - 104 Published Online: 23 Apr 2003 Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Review Article Arachidonic acid cytotoxicity: can arachidonic acid be a physiological mediator of cell death? Celine Pompeia 1 *, Thais Lima 2, Rui Curi 2 Abstract: Arachidonic acid is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that mediates inflammation and the functioning of several organs and systems either directly or upon its conversion into eicosanoids. However, arachidonic acid is found to be cytotoxic in vitro at concentrations that overlap physiological ones. It is tempting therefore to speculate that arachidonic acid may be a physiological inducer of apoptosis and that such cytotoxic action may be another of its roles in vivo. Nevertheless its pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress-inducing features are characteristic of necrosis and pathological conditions. We hereby review the cytotoxic action of arachidonic acid, indicate the possible pathways that lead to cell death and contemplate the cytotoxic role of arachidonic acid in vivo. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"monty" <spamorama@spamville.net> wrote in message news:<yT5Fc.1473$Wd.6401@ord-read.news.verio.net>...
> Could you provide a link to that interview with Mary Enig > you mentioned? I use a little coconut oil, but even more > shredded coconut, which is much less expensive (I buy 25 > pound bags, then grind it down even more, and you can then > add it to all kinds of things as a flavor enhancer). The > way they get away with making ridiculous claims in > epidemiological studies is by using selective endpoints. > For example,I saw a TV commercial for one of the most > common osteoporosis drugs, and they said that this drug > increases bone mass. They did not say that it prevents > more fractures than taking placebo, nor did they say that > it increases bone density, which is the most important > thing, to my knowledge. But because the ?endpoint? was > determined to be only bone mass, they get away with > telling people how great their product is. This sort of > thing is typical ? going on all around us, all the time. > There?s an interesting study I mentioned in one of the two > recent posts about butter being beneficial to bone growth, > whereas arachidonic acid?s metabolites are inhibitors. In > the case of ?saturated fat,? if you classify lard as a > ?saturated fat,? even though it?s only 39% SFAs and highly > subject to free radical degradation (due to all the > unsaturated fatty acids and no significant antioxidant > content), and on top of that only concern yourself with > whether a food lowers or raises either total serum > cholesterol or LDL (and ignore the reality that only > oxidized cholesterol is the problem, so you can have high > cholesterol as long as it is not oxidized, and this seems > to be the healthiest of all possible situations regarding > one?s cholesterol) as your ?endpoint? you can claim that > ?saturated fat? is unhealthy. Of course, they look stupid > to those who have read the studies demonstrating how > healthy people are who use fresh coconut as dietary > staples, but most people are unaware of these studies ? > our great ?science journalists? seem to have someone > missed this point in their rush to tell us how great a new > drug that extends the life of terminally-ill cancer > patients two months (18 months instead of 16, though they > don?t talk of the side-effects). ? that?s a true story in > Newsday newspaper a week or so ago ? it was hailed by the > scientist interviewed as a ?major victory.? I?ll take a > ?loss? with coconut oil (that is, higher, but non-oxidized > serum cholesterol levels) and let them have as many > ?victories? as they want, if that?s what they define as a > victory. > > Here?s just one of the studies that discusses how > dangerous arachidonic acid can be under normal conditions > in your body, if you eat more than a small amount of omega > 6 PUFAs: > > Cell Biochemistry and Function Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages > 97 - 104 > > Published Online: 23 Apr 2003 > > Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Review Article > > Arachidonic acid cytotoxicity: can arachidonic acid be a > physiological mediator of cell death? Celine Pompeia 1 *, > Thais Lima 2, Rui Curi 2 Abstract: Arachidonic acid is a > polyunsaturated fatty acid that mediates inflammation and > the functioning of several organs and systems either > directly or upon its conversion into eicosanoids. However, > arachidonic acid is found to be cytotoxic in vitro at > concentrations that overlap physiological ones. It is > tempting therefore to speculate that arachidonic acid may > be a physiological inducer of apoptosis and that such > cytotoxic action may be another of its roles in vivo. > Nevertheless its pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress- > inducing features are characteristic of necrosis and > pathological conditions. We hereby review the cytotoxic > action of arachidonic acid, indicate the possible pathways > that lead to cell death and contemplate the cytotoxic role > of arachidonic acid in > vivo. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The interview with Mary Enig was actualy on a radio program called Your Own Heatlh and Fitness on KPFA. Its the best health program I have found with the most accurate information, actualy probably the only one with accurate information. The host is Layna Berman and she has had Mary Enig on many times as well as many other interesting people you simply do not hear much of because of their out of the mainstream views. And whenever she has someone on who has good information but is still missguided about saturated fats she always calls them on it and puts out her views. Unfortunately you would have to purchase tapes of her shows for 10 dollars. I believe the date of the Mary Enig interview I mentioned was 12/02/03 however I am not 100% sure. It is either that one or the 1/13/04. You can listen to her show every tuesday at 1pm at KPFA.org and download it for free from archives but only on that same day. Her last show was very good, concerning the dangers of statins. Her guest was former astronaut Duane Graveline MD and he talked about his horrifying experience with lipitor and his new book "Lipitor, Thief of Memory" The whole situation with statins is so dispicable and sickening. http://www.yourownhealthandfitness.com http://www.kpfa.org Also here is a fairly recent study on arachidonic acid and atherosclerosis I stumbled apon. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...?cmd=retrieve&- db=pubmed&list_uids=14702425&dopt=Abstract |