Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Cage lengths

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14-07.-2004, 08:43 PM   #1
dabac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 849
Default Cage lengths

Hi guys,

I'm looking at replacing a really old derailleur (LX, unknown length) and suddenly have the option to choose cage length. I've done a little bit of research and have come up with the following:

Long cage will allow any combination of front rings/cassettes, short cage might cause compatibility issues.

Short cage should be a bit snappier when changing gears.

Many XC riders doesn't care what they're running.

Am I missing something? Do I really need to care about what length I'm buying?

(I've found some LX and XT derailleurs at tempting prices. Most usual type of riding is XC on difficult singletracks, occasionally long rides in the mountains with heavy climbs.)
dabac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-07.-2004, 11:04 PM   #2
tyler_derden
Registered User
 
tyler_derden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kirksville, Mo.
Posts: 268
Default Re: Cage lengths

I have been slowly dialing in a bike I got in trade a while back. When I got the bike, there were gear combinations that I could not hit because the chain was too short to wrap around the biggest chainring and cog. I replaced the chain with the recommended length (using the biggest chainring + cog + one extra link method and found that the bike now hits all gears fine however, when I am on the smallest cog and smallest chainring (I know, not really a good place to be) the derailleur is not able to put any real tension on the chain and the chain coming from the bottom of the chainring rubs against the chain that is wrapped around the upper jockey wheel of the derailleur. The low tension (or lack thereof) also makes it easy for the chain to get bounced off the chainring.

There are some who would argue that I should not be able to hit all the gears and that I should put the chain back the way it was. I think that potential problems caused by attempting to shift into a combination that can't work are the more serious (muscling a shifter and pulling the cable loose under the screw at the derailleur, for one), so I will stay with the longer chain and look for a solution elsewhere.

After riding the bike for a while, I think the solution is to replace the smallest chainring with a bigger one because that ring is just too small (20 teeth). I find that it is so small that when I try to use it with the larger cogs I can't maintain enough forward momentum to keep from falling over. Maybe my poor riding technique is to blame, but I think the chainring is too small.

The reason I go into all this is to point out that the cage length you select will be a function of your cogs and chainrings and the gears you want to use.
Derailleur specs usually list a range of gears over which they will work (max/min chainring and cog sizes). I believe cage length is one of the things that affects the spec.

All that said, a longer the cage will make it easier to bend your hanger.

TD
__________________
"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."
tyler_derden is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-07.-2004, 05:39 PM   #3
markski
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3
Default Rear Mech, 8 speed/9speed

I have a XT 8 speed shifters, they dont seem to supply new 8 speed rear mechs , I have herd that 9 speed XT rear mech are compatable, can anyone advise me
markski is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-07.-2004, 09:06 PM   #4
dabac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 849
Default Re: Rear Mech, 8 speed/9speed

Quote:
Originally Posted by markski
I have a XT 8 speed shifters, they dont seem to supply new 8 speed rear mechs , I have herd that 9 speed XT rear mech are compatable, can anyone advise me

Rear derailleurs are very compatible, there's shouldn't be any problem using a 9 spd one with your old shifters. You might want to get one with the old spring direction though.
dabac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-07.-2004, 11:19 PM   #5
markski
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: Rear Mech, 8 speed/9speed

What is the old spring direction?????
markski is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07.-2004, 06:08 AM   #6
boudreaux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,151
Default Re: Rear Mech, 8 speed/9speed

Quote:
Originally Posted by markski
What is the old spring direction?????
High normal...AKA: non rapid rise.
boudreaux is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet