![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I will be changing the battery in my Norco F-3 speed and distance trip
meter. This of course will zero the internal calculations for wheel side. I have LOST the instructions, can anyone help please! Wheel size 26" (mountain style bike) Thanks a lot Robin |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <wWKcc.40504$Ig.36962@pd7tw2no>,
"Robin S" <reply@to.group.ca> wrote: > I will be changing the battery in my Norco F-3 speed and distance trip > meter. This of course will zero the internal calculations for wheel side. > I have LOST the instructions, can anyone help please! Wheel size 26" > (mountain style bike) Do you not remember how to set the clock, or just can't remember the correct wheel size? Computers typically take a wheel circumference number. My Cateye uses one in millimeters (4-digit number), some use centimetres. Cateye's chart of nominal wheel sizes and circumference numbers: http://www.cateye.com/manuals/tech_calibrate.htm You're around 2055 mm circumference, depending on the tire size. -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Ryan
I think I have figured it out, it comes up with a default 2124 number which is adjustable, that must be the mm input. Robin "Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in message news:rcousine-EF9402.22554806042004@morgoth.sfu.ca... > In article <wWKcc.40504$Ig.36962@pd7tw2no>, > "Robin S" <reply@to.group.ca> wrote: > > > I will be changing the battery in my Norco F-3 speed and distance trip > > meter. This of course will zero the internal calculations for wheel side. > > I have LOST the instructions, can anyone help please! Wheel size 26" > > (mountain style bike) > > Do you not remember how to set the clock, or just can't remember the > correct wheel size? > > Computers typically take a wheel circumference number. My Cateye uses > one in millimeters (4-digit number), some use centimetres. > > Cateye's chart of nominal wheel sizes and circumference numbers: > > http://www.cateye.com/manuals/tech_calibrate.htm > > You're around 2055 mm circumference, depending on the tire size. > -- > Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ > President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <hA%cc.47047$Ig.5621@pd7tw2no>,
"Robin S" <reply@to.group.ca> wrote: > "Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in message > > "Robin S" <reply@to.group.ca> wrote: > > > > > I will be changing the battery in my Norco F-3 speed and distance trip > > > meter. This of course will zero the internal calculations for wheel > side. > > Computers typically take a wheel circumference number. My Cateye uses > > one in millimeters (4-digit number), some use centimetres. > > > > Cateye's chart of nominal wheel sizes and circumference numbers: > > http://www.cateye.com/manuals/tech_calibrate.htm > > You're around 2055 mm circumference, depending on the tire size. > I think I have figured it out, it comes up with a default 2124 number which > is adjustable, that must be the mm input. Yes. For the most accurate possible circumference measurement, the traditional trick is to put a small dab of paint on the road, ride through it, and then measure the distance between the first and second paint dabs. Simply running a string around the bike wheel isn't quite as accurate, because the tire distorts at the contact patch, and the effective circumference is defined by that "loaded circle," or to put it another way, with the rider's weight on the bike, the effective radius is the distance from the axle to the ground. Making it too complicated, -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> Yes. For the most accurate possible circumference measurement, the > traditional trick is to put a small dab of paint on the road, ride > through it, and then measure the distance between the first and second > paint dabs. > > Simply running a string around the bike wheel isn't quite as accurate, > because the tire distorts at the contact patch, and the effective > circumference is defined by that "loaded circle," or to put it another > way, with the rider's weight on the bike, the effective radius is the > distance from the axle to the ground. > > Making it too complicated, I did something similar, but measured three revolutions instead of just one for even better accuracy. Then, of course, I found out that my computer takes circumference in centimeters for calibration. Sigh. -- Benjamin Lewis Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain |
|