Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
09-04.-2004, 02:28 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Seatpost tubing thickness (in general)
I've had no replies to my specific question on ITM posts so here's a more
general one: For the same models, do manufacturers generally use the same thickness tubing for their smaller sizes of seatposts as they do in the larger sizes? Thanks for any info. I've previously suggested that the ITM Big One and Millenium seatposts were the same things except for finish, but I'm not so sure now after buying a 27.0 Millenium. The tube wall is much thinner than the 25.0 Big One's so I'm wondering if different alloys are used after all. Millenium = 7075. ITM told me the alloys were the same (despite their website vaguely implying otherwise) but I now suspect I was given duff info. Or could the Big One use the same alloy but just more of it!? Saddle clamp material is different anyway: same design but Millenium's is slightly lighter stuff. ~PB |
|
Linear Mode
