![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
He almost sounds reasonable. From letters to CyclingNews:
Manzano The letter from Mr. Taylor troubles me. His point appears to be that in some manner Jesus Manzano must be lying about the use of drugs in a sport renown for drug dependence. Let's admit it, when someone like Jacques Anquetil can essentially laugh about drug use without response from the sport's controlling bodies it isn't likely to change. There is sufficient evidence from any number of revelations be it the books from Willy Voet or Paul Kimmage or the fact that the strategies for avoiding testing positive described by Manzano are completely logical. Would you suppose he made this entire thing up? No, drugs are a scourge upon the sport because those who could win clean feel the need to use drugs to maintain a status quo among less talented riders. And those, whose honor forbids them to use drugs, are punished by lesser performances in relation to those who use drugs without compunction. As for his Kelme vs. Cofidis comparison. Perhaps I didn't get the full story but it was my understanding that Cofidis was a problem with a rider whereas the concerns about Kelme was that the TEAM was forcing drugs upon their riders not directly but in a manner that gave them little choice in the matter. "You must listen to the doctors." Tom Kunich USA Friday, April 9, 2004 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Roubaix" <Roubaix@Corsica.com> wrote in message news:ymWfc.8715$l75.991@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > He almost sounds reasonable. From letters to CyclingNews: > > Manzano > The letter from Mr. Taylor troubles me. His point appears to be that in some > manner Jesus Manzano must be lying about the use of drugs in a sport renown > for drug dependence. Let's admit it, when someone like Jacques Anquetil can > essentially laugh about drug use without response from the sport's > controlling bodies it isn't likely to change. > > There is sufficient evidence from any number of revelations be it the books > from Willy Voet or Paul Kimmage or the fact that the strategies for avoiding > testing positive described by Manzano are completely logical. Would you > suppose he made this entire thing up? > > No, drugs are a scourge upon the sport because those who could win clean > feel the need to use drugs to maintain a status quo among less talented > riders. And those, whose honor forbids them to use drugs, are punished by > lesser performances in relation to those who use drugs without compunction. > > As for his Kelme vs. Cofidis comparison. Perhaps I didn't get the full story > but it was my understanding that Cofidis was a problem with a rider whereas > the concerns about Kelme was that the TEAM was forcing drugs upon their > riders not directly but in a manner that gave them little choice in the > matter. "You must listen to the doctors." Not bad from Tom, despite the incomplete sentence at the start of the last paragraph. Phil Holman |
|