Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > rec.bicycles.misc
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-04.-2004, 10:39 PM   #1
ShoeFly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

I don't bike much, but I do enjoy wowing people with useless
facts, so here recently when someone asked me why boys' bikes have that
horizontal bar between the seat and the handlebar, whereas girls' bikes
have a curved one, I was stumped. I tried searching on Google, but I
couldn't find any answer to this, so I figured I'd get the answer straight
from the horses mouth. Someone care to enlighten me?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 10:47 PM   #2
Elisa Francesca Roselli
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?



ShoeFly wrote:

> I don't bike much, but I do enjoy wowing people with useless
> facts, so here recently when someone asked me why boys' bikes have that
> horizontal bar between the seat and the handlebar, whereas girls' bikes
> have a curved one, I was stumped. I tried searching on Google, but I
> couldn't find any answer to this, so I figured I'd get the answer straight
> from the horses mouth. Someone care to enlighten me?


uhm, because some girls wear skirts?

EFR
Ile de France


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 10:49 PM   #3
dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

>I don't bike much, but I do enjoy wowing people with useless
>facts, so here recently when someone asked me why boys' bikes have that
>horizontal bar between the seat and the handlebar, whereas girls' bikes
>have a curved one, I was stumped. I tried searching on Google, but I
>couldn't find any answer to this, so I figured I'd get the answer straight
>from the horses mouth. Someone care to enlighten me?


We-ell... when I was a young girl, back in the dim mists of pre-history, the
reason given as why a girl's bike doesn't have a crossbar was that girls wear
skirts. Wearing of a skirt whilst cycling is made easier if the bike isn't the
traditional diamond shape.

Saying that, last summer in Germany, I saw loads of blokes riding what is
ordinarily described as a girls' bike in the UK. It didn't seem to bother them
one jot. Plus, if, to use a phrase, one has difficulty getting one's leg over,
a step-through frame will make going for a ride easier (ooh-err Missus!).

Again, personally speaking I never did like to wear a skirt when cycling and
still don't. So I use a diamond-frame "man's bike" - and have no problem
getting my leg over (ooh-err Missus!).

Cheers, helen s



--This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
to get correct one remove fame & fortune
h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

--Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--



  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 11:33 PM   #4
Curtis L. Russell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

On 20 Apr 2004 13:49:05 GMT, wafflycathcs@aol.comcomcom
(dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers) wrote:

>Saying that, last summer in Germany, I saw loads of blokes riding what is
>ordinarily described as a girls' bike in the UK. It didn't seem to bother them
>one jot. Plus, if, to use a phrase, one has difficulty getting one's leg over,
>a step-through frame will make going for a ride easier (ooh-err Missus!).


My Bike Friday Metro is a step through (to fold) and the step through
frame is often easier to use when carrying moderately heavy packages
in downtown traffic with frequent stops and starts. Don't really have
to think much of how the package is attached to the rear, as long as
it is fastened down and fairly balanced.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 11:53 PM   #5
Matt O'Toole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers wrote:

> Saying that, last summer in Germany, I saw loads of blokes riding
> what is ordinarily described as a girls' bike in the UK. It didn't
> seem to bother them one jot. Plus, if, to use a phrase, one has
> difficulty getting one's leg over, a step-through frame will make
> going for a ride easier (ooh-err Missus!).


Surfers like girls' bikes because it's easier to mount them with a surfboard
under one arm.

Matt O.


  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04.-2004, 12:00 PM   #6
Curtis L. Russell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:53:30 GMT, "Matt O'Toole" <matt@deltanet.com>
wrote:

>Surfers like girls' bikes because it's easier to mount them with a surfboard
>under one arm.


And its dangerous to mount a diamond frame in a speedo...

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04.-2004, 09:20 PM   #7
Rick Onanian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:33:21 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
<curtis@md-bicycling.org> wrote:
>My Bike Friday Metro is a step through (to fold) and the step through
>frame is often easier to use when carrying moderately heavy packages
>in downtown traffic with frequent stops and starts. Don't really have
>to think much of how the package is attached to the rear, as long as
>it is fastened down and fairly balanced.


I don't understand how the top tube affects carrying a package
rear-attached. Or are you saying that you don't have to attach it to
the rear (and hence needn't worry about it there)?
--
Rick Onanian
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04.-2004, 09:34 PM   #8
David Kerber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A question - Girls' bikes and boys' bikes - Why the difference?

In article <4kpc80d55vtdg2qvgk864s5m7c57hoe4ds@4ax.com>,
spamsink@cox.net says...
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:33:21 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
> <curtis@md-bicycling.org> wrote:
> >My Bike Friday Metro is a step through (to fold) and the step through
> >frame is often easier to use when carrying moderately heavy packages
> >in downtown traffic with frequent stops and starts. Don't really have
> >to think much of how the package is attached to the rear, as long as
> >it is fastened down and fairly balanced.

>
> I don't understand how the top tube affects carrying a package
> rear-attached. Or are you saying that you don't have to attach it to
> the rear (and hence needn't worry about it there)?


Just guessing, but maybe he means that he doesn't have to worry about
how high the package goes behind the seat, because he doesn't have to
lift his leg over it?

--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com