Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Bike comparison

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-03.-2003, 10:47 PM   #1
Jeremy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Default Bike comparison

I've been looking into buying a bike and I'm after a bit of advice.
I'm mainly going to use it for riding around the city, but every now and then I'll be doing a bit of off road riding, but nothing too rough.
Some that I've had recomended to me from a couple of local shops are:
Marin Bolinas http://www.marinbikes.com/2002bikes...ew-bolinas.html
Giant Rincon http://www.giant-bicycles.com/au/03...n=8783&range=31
They are both the same price (the Marin one was much higher but it is on sale). What would you recomend? I havn't heard much of marin before but they offer a lifetime warrenty so I guess they must be ok.
Are there any other models that I should look at? I'm hoping to not spend more than $700 australian.
Thanks.
Jeremy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-03.-2003, 03:19 AM   #2
MtnBikerChk
Community Team
 
MtnBikerChk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 291
Send a message via AIM to MtnBikerChk
Default

I'm a huge Giant fan (sounds funny, doesn't it?).

I don't have a lot of experience with Marin - but I have a Giant road bike and love it.

Giant is known for giving you the most bang for your buck.

Which one feels right?
MtnBikerChk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-03.-2003, 05:15 PM   #3
Lazy legs
Registered User
 
Lazy legs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 299
Send a message via AIM to Lazy legs Send a message via Yahoo to Lazy legs
Default

Hi Jeremy, do you want to start a war on this site. Everyone around here ownes the BEST bike, just ask them one at a time.
Have you considdered trying a Hybrid? Best of both worlds, or so they say. I know that Trek has some good ones. try this link-
http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2003/citybike/index.jsp
Good luck.
__________________
Mike

FAILURE
It lies in the perception
Not in the situation.
Lazy legs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04.-2003, 10:20 AM   #4
Chi
Junior Member
 
Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7
Send a message via AIM to Chi Send a message via Yahoo to Chi
Default

Marin designs their cables on the downtube, making them susceptible to mud and other crap that may ruin good shifting. Giant and many other makers design their cables on the top tube, putting them out of the way of mud, etc.

Marins are also made in Taiwan, whereas Giants are made in China. I don't think there's much difference in quality.

What I like about Marins over Giants is their tube designs. Instead of making large diameter tubes, they use bends in their tubes, making them look less circular and more rectangular. This is supposed to make the bikes lighter, but I think it's more of a cosmetic touch than anything else.

I'm also in the market for a similarly priced bike, and I'm looking into Trek or Giant.
__________________
Save gas, ride a bike!
Chi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04.-2003, 09:58 PM   #5
Allo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 27
Default

If the Marin was more expensive, it's likely to have better components. This is the most important thing in a bike at this price point, the frames will be very similar in quality.

Don't listen to the top tube cable routing crap. In fact, some argue that BB routed cables attract less problems. The horizontal position of the rear cable stop means you don't get water straight in the end of that final loop, which is alwars the section that goes first. I subscribe to this view, but I think in the long run it makes very little difference. Cannondales use under the BB routing, so it can't be too bad. I've had both designs over the years, and found both still get worn cables over time no matter what.
Allo is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet