Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
27-07.-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,667
|
Lance's successor
So the '04 tour has come and gone with Lance dominating.
Looking towards future tour winners, there doesn't really seem to be anyone on the immediate horizon with Lance's skills as both a climber and a time trialler. If the future crop can only have one of these, which is better? Do you think it is better to start as a good climber and then train yourself to be able time trial? eg Cunego, Basso, Mayo. Or, is it better to be a good time trialler and then train yourself to climb? eg Popovych, Gontchar, McGee, Rogers (okay, I am Australian!) |
|
|
Linear Mode
