![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 78
|
Who do you think is the best rider never to have won the Tour?. Obviously Raymond Poulidor springs to mind but riders such as Sean Kelly and Tony Rominger also. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
Rominger Bugno Breukink Zuelle Chiappucci Berzin Virenque Tonkov Hampsten |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
|
I'll try and think of some more.....
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
|
Mottet
Lejaretta Bernard |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
|
Are we talking about Tour contenders never to win the Tour, or just riders never to win the Tour? Because names like Van Looy, De Vlaeminck, and Van Steenbergen come to mind, but they never contended. If only contenders, then there are the obvious names like Poulidor, Kelly, and perhaps Jalabert (as well as many, many others).
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 83
|
Raymond Poullider for me.
If Vinokourov never wins one, I will put him in the list. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 259
|
Ulrich *almost* qualifies for this list ;0
Damn well feels like he's never won at times anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Another vote for Sean Kelly. He was a class act. It was great when he won the Vuelta. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 8
|
Am new to biking, but I have heard a lot about Chipolinni (spelled wrong). Would he qualify.
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
|
Cipollini? He's too one dimensional. The day he wins Liege-Bastogne-Liege (or some such hilly race) he'll merit inclusion in this list.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 259
|
He's a sprinter at the end of his career.
He could qualify in the >best riders never to have 'finished' the Tour< but has never ,ever been a contender even for a podium place.If the road goes vertical for more than a mile he usually climb off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
|
I'd say Rominger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
I am very very tempted to tell you what Cippollini would qualify for but it would be moderated Let's just say, it certainly wouldn't be the best rider never to have won a Tour ! For to be considered for the question - the rider has to finish the Tour, Cippo hasn't even managed to do that ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
It's a great question, Phil. I think Sean Kelly has to be considered (world no I rated cyclist 1984-1989). Poulidor too. Jalabert. The french cyclist from the 1950's Gemiani (have I spelt that correctly ?) was a great three Tour a season rider. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 91
|
I agree with Rominger and Kelly and Jalabert.
Chiapucci is up there (even though I didn't like him much). Jean-Francois Bernard could have won if he had more heart. How about Andy Hampsten? I hope we never have to add Tyler Hamilton to this list...
__________________
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. |
|
|
|