Female cyclists.

half_pint

Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
of positionl awareness?

I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|

I had better not post this actually.

regards

galf_pint.

garryb59

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:21:57 GMT, "half_pint" <me123@privacy.net>
wrote:

>Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
>do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
>of positionl awareness?

Sheesh man....you could always have your back to the mattress for a
change. Must be a Government directive out there somewhere...


Garry

Peter Clinch

half_pint wrote:
> Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
> do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
> of positionl awareness?
>
> I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|
>
> I had better not post this actually.

Actually, I'm glad you did. It's taken you from the point where I was
only 99% sure you were a troll rather than just a naturally clueless
phenomenon of utter wrongness up to the magic 100% mark, so now I can
safely ignore you.

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

Helen Deborah Vecht

Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk>typed


> half_pint wrote:
> > Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
> > do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
> > of positionl awareness?
> >
> > I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|
> >
> > I had better not post this actually.

> Actually, I'm glad you did. It's taken you from the point where I was
> only 99% sure you were a troll rather than just a naturally clueless
> phenomenon of utter wrongness up to the magic 100% mark, so now I can
> safely ignore you.

Half_pint isn't just a troll; he writes three paragraphs with so much
internal logical inconsistency that I doubt I'll have any fun playing
with him.

Nul points.

--
Helen D. Vecht: helenvecht@zetnet.co.uk
Edgware.

dkahn400

Peter Clinch wrote:
> half_pint wrote:

> > I had better not post this actually.
>
> Actually, I'm glad you did. It's taken you from the point where I
> was only 99% sure you were a troll rather than just a naturally
> clueless phenomenon of utter wrongness up to the magic 100% mark,
> so now I can safely ignore you.

Beat me to it. I wasn't quite as sure; there seemed a real possibility
he was merely suffering from a personality disorder. This calculated
troll removes that doubt.

--
Dave...

Jon

"half_pint" <me123@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:VS6ud.1499$4b2.831@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
> Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
> do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
> of positionl awareness?
>
> I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|
>
> I had better not post this actually.
>
> regards
>
> galf_pint.
>
>
I am totally for female. cyclists!

Following a nice, fit female cyclist in her lycra is always guaranteed to
put another 1 or 2 mph on my average!

:-)

Eiron

Jon wrote:


> I am totally for female. cyclists!
>
> Following a nice, fit female cyclist in her lycra is always guaranteed to
> put another 1 or 2 mph on my average!

Round here they all look like Margaret Rutherford in tweed suits,
their bicycles have wicker baskets, and they are still faster than me!

--
Eiron.

Dave Larrington

Peter Clinch wrote:

> Actually, I'm glad you did. It's taken you from the point where I was
> only 99% sure you were a troll rather than just a naturally clueless
> phenomenon of utter wrongness up to the magic 100% mark, so now I can
> safely ignore you.

I suspect that this may be someone else pretending to be half_wit for the
purposes of joke comedy trolling. /Why/ anyone should want to be mistaken
for the original half_wit, however, is a question best considered while
drunk.

--

Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
World Domination?
Just find a world that's into that kind of thing, then chain to the
floor and walk up and down on it in high heels. (Mr. Sunshine)

Tim

In article <VS6ud.1499$4b2.831@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>, half_pint wrote:
> Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
> do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
> of positionl awareness?
>
> I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|
>
> I had better not post this actually.
>
> regards
>
> galf_pint.
>
>

I dare you to say that withing hearing (and punishment) range of
any of the female cyclists I know. They tend to have excellent spatial
and positional awareness.
--
Tim.

David Martin

On 10/12/04 10:47 am, in article slrncrivlr.qjc.tim@dot.spiny-norman.net,
"Tim" <tim@spiny-norman.net> wrote:

> In article <VS6ud.1499$4b2.831@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>, half_pint wrote:
>> Whilst I agree ,in genera,l the females are (on average) lovely people
>> do we really need them clogging up our highways with their lack
>> of positionl awareness?
>>
>> I post this as an open question, I have no view either way myself :O|
>>
>> I had better not post this actually.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> galf_pint.
>>
>>
>
> I dare you to say that withing hearing (and punishment) range of
> any of the female cyclists I know. They tend to have excellent spatial
> and positional awareness.

And an ability to heave paving slabs with uncanny accuracy!

...d

JohnB

David Martin wrote:
>

> > I dare you to say that withing hearing (and punishment) range of
> > any of the female cyclists I know. They tend to have excellent spatial
> > and positional awareness.
>
> And an ability to heave paving slabs with uncanny accuracy!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

John B

Alan Braggins

In article <31tddeF3egk1iU2@individual.net>, Dave Larrington wrote:
>Peter Clinch wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm glad you did. It's taken you from the point where I was
>> only 99% sure you were a troll rather than just a naturally clueless
>> phenomenon of utter wrongness up to the magic 100% mark, so now I can
>> safely ignore you.
>
>I suspect that this may be someone else pretending to be half_wit for the
>purposes of joke comedy trolling. /Why/ anyone should want to be mistaken
>for the original half_wit, however, is a question best considered while
>drunk.

He has changed newfeed and address, but it does seem to be the same half_wit.
(As for "why would anyone pretend to be him", I suspect the answer would be
to provoke more people into killfiling him and ignoring him, instead of
responding to him.)