Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling > uk.rec.cycling arch
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-12.-2004, 06:57 PM   #1
michaeld121@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes



I'm hoping that Santa is going to bring me a child seat this year, but
I need to make sure that I put the right one on my Christmas list.

I was going to go for the Rhodes Co-Pilot but my local bike shop
recommended the Hamax Sleepy on the grounds that it's cheaper, just as
good and you don't need a special rack for it (which makes using
panniers & using the seat on other bikes easier).

Has anyone got one of these Hamax seats & are they any good? The only
people I know who've got child seats have got the Rhodes so I was
wondering if the Hamax has any pitfalls?

Thanks,

Michael

 
Old 11-12.-2004, 08:07 PM   #2
Paul Rudin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes

michaeld121@hotmail.com writes:

> I'm hoping that Santa is going to bring me a child seat this year, but
> I need to make sure that I put the right one on my Christmas list.
>
> I was going to go for the Rhodes Co-Pilot but my local bike shop
> recommended the Hamax Sleepy on the grounds that it's cheaper, just as
> good and you don't need a special rack for it (which makes using
> panniers & using the seat on other bikes easier).
>
> Has anyone got one of these Hamax seats & are they any good? The only
> people I know who've got child seats have got the Rhodes so I was
> wondering if the Hamax has any pitfalls?


I've used both brands - although perhaps not the exact models you're
interested in. One of the drawback I had with the Hammax was that
the sides were not deep - so if the kid fell asleep then there wasn't
really anything to lean against.
 
Old 11-12.-2004, 09:49 PM   #3
Roger F
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes


michaeld121@hotmail.com wrote:
> I'm hoping that Santa is going to bring me a child seat this year,

but
> I need to make sure that I put the right one on my Christmas list.
>
> I was going to go for the Rhodes Co-Pilot but my local bike shop
> recommended the Hamax Sleepy on the grounds that it's cheaper, just

as
> good and you don't need a special rack for it (which makes using
> panniers & using the seat on other bikes easier).
>
> Has anyone got one of these Hamax seats & are they any good? The

only
> people I know who've got child seats have got the Rhodes so I was
> wondering if the Hamax has any pitfalls?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael


We have used two Rhodes on our bikes and we have carried our two
little'uns all over the place. Most of the time they fall asleep so I
liked the fact that they were held in well. Also, if you fall off the
child is well protected all round. I did come off once with my son in
the seat and he suffered no ill effects whatsoever. I liked the quick
slid-on slide off of the Rhodes too. I have not seen the Hamax but can
recommend the Rhodes.

 
Old 12-12.-2004, 02:05 AM   #4
David Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes

michaeld121@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm hoping that Santa is going to bring me a child seat this year, but
> I need to make sure that I put the right one on my Christmas list.
>
> I was going to go for the Rhodes Co-Pilot but my local bike shop
> recommended the Hamax Sleepy on the grounds that it's cheaper, just as
> good and you don't need a special rack for it (which makes using
> panniers & using the seat on other bikes easier).
>
> Has anyone got one of these Hamax seats & are they any good? The only
> people I know who've got child seats have got the Rhodes so I was
> wondering if the Hamax has any pitfalls?


I haven't got the sleepy but I do have a normal one. Great seat. Been
using it for over five years now. Kids love it. The only mod (apart from
sticking loads of reflectors on the back) was to change the foot straps
for some short velcro tie down straps when the foot straps broke.

Otherwise, great seat, and I use panniers on the same bike, but not at
the same time.

...d
 
Old 12-12.-2004, 05:07 AM   #5
Marc Brett
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes

On 11 Dec 2004 00:57:33 -0800, michaeld121@hotmail.com wrote:


>I was going to go for the Rhodes Co-Pilot but my local bike shop
>recommended the Hamax Sleepy on the grounds that it's cheaper, just as
>good and you don't need a special rack for it (which makes using
>panniers & using the seat on other bikes easier).
>
>Has anyone got one of these Hamax seats & are they any good? The only
>people I know who've got child seats have got the Rhodes so I was
>wondering if the Hamax has any pitfalls?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Michael


I have a Hamax, and people are right about the sleepy thing -- when sonandheir
falls asleep, he leans outboard in a fashion that seems precarious and
uncomfortable. It doesn't seem to "cocoon" him for crashing (in both senses),
but I've never collision-tested it. When he's awake, it's fine, seems comfy,
and is easy to get on and off the bike.

In the Hamax's favour, it does seem to grow well with the child. It still works
for him at 5 years old because of the long adjustable footrests. (He's got a
bike of his own, but he isn't up to city-centre riding just yet.) His
identically-sized friend in a Co-Pilot is doubled-up like a pretzel.

 
Old 14-12.-2004, 02:23 AM   #6
michaeld121@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Child Seat: Hamax vs Rhodes


Thanks for the replies. Does anyone know if there's any way (apart
from having a good look at them) of working out which is the safer.
I'm thinking of things like safety standards or ratings.

Michael

 
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com