Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
15-12.-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Helmets revisited
After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY accidident
that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. I even had a CAT scan. All accidents are unique. But in my case, wearing a helmet helped. I think. Regards, A cyclist but who won't cycle until this concussion is gone. Jeff |
|
15-12.-2004, 05:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
Jeff A wrote:
> After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY accidident > that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. How do you know that? Tony |
|
15-12.-2004, 09:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
Tony Raven wrote:
> Jeff A wrote: >> After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY >> accidident that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. > > How do you know that? > > Tony Hence my writing "little doubt". There may be some. Regards Jeff. |
|
15-12.-2004, 09:33 PM
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
Jeff A wrote:
>>>After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY >>>accidident that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. >> >>How do you know that? > > Hence my writing "little doubt". There may be some. I think what Tony was asking was (and certainly the question I'm asking is :-), how do you know it reduced a more serious injury? Not the level of confidence of your knowledge. R. |
|
15-12.-2004, 11:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
Richard wrote:
> Jeff A wrote: > >>>> After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY >>>> accidident that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. >>> >>> How do you know that? >> >> Hence my writing "little doubt". There may be some. > > I think what Tony was asking was (and certainly the question I'm > asking is :-), how do you know it reduced a more serious injury? Not > the level of confidence of your knowledge. > > R. :-) TBH I don't know. Maybe a gash to the head could be better than a helmet absorbing the full blow. Cheers and regards Jeff |
|
15-12.-2004, 11:40 PM
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
On 15/12/04 1:25 pm, in article 32as9hF3jpts8U1@individual.net, "Jeff A"
<jackerley@lineone.net> wrote: > Richard wrote: >> Jeff A wrote: >> >>>>> After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY >>>>> accidident that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. >>>> >>>> How do you know that? >>> >>> Hence my writing "little doubt". There may be some. >> >> I think what Tony was asking was (and certainly the question I'm >> asking is :-), how do you know it reduced a more serious injury? Not >> the level of confidence of your knowledge. >> >> R. > > :-) TBH I don't know. Maybe a gash to the head could be better than a helmet > absorbing the full blow. The pooint being made is that rotational injury (which helmets can exacerbate) is far more damaging than linear impacts. When you hit the corner, was it pretty much head on or did it twist your head? if it was head on, then it probably would have helped. ...d |
|
15-12.-2004, 11:44 PM
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Helmets revisited
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:25:07 -0000, "Jeff A" <jackerley@lineone.net>
wrote: >Richard wrote: >> Jeff A wrote: >> >>>>> After fainting again I went upto A&E. There is little doubt in MY >>>>> accidident that wearing a helmet reduced a more severe injury. >>>> >>>> How do you know that? >>> >>> Hence my writing "little doubt". There may be some. >> >> I think what Tony was asking was (and certainly the question I'm >> asking is :-), how do you know it reduced a more serious injury? Not >> the level of confidence of your knowledge. >> >> R. > > TBH I don't know. Maybe a gash to the head could be better than a helmet >absorbing the full blow. > Cuts to the scalp would certainly be preferable to a head injury that causes concussion and delayed loss of conciousness as you describe. Depending on the type of blow, it's quite possible that you have traded cuts and grazes (which helmets prevent) for rotational brain injuries (which helmets can cause). |
Linear Mode
