![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Rich vaguely muttered something like ...
> "I can't understand why all these cyclists insist on riding on the road > when there is a perfectly good shared use path" I think many, not all, 'Cycling Officers' are there more by the chance that they have a cycle, and the councils have to appoint a 'Cycling Officer', rather than they're actually interested and enthusiastic cyclists. If all you deal with in your working life are Local Council structures and Highway Engineering Departments, your outlook is likely to be coloured somewhat. It is possibly also the case, it is in my council anyway, that cyclists views are expressed more from a car drivers viewpoint purely because enthusiastic, knowledgable and cyclists who are interested in campaigning for and changing views, don't work for councils, and especially don't work for small councils. > and these were cycling officers! No wonder it's such hard work > campaigning for cycling. It's easy enough campaigning, the hard bit is getting them to listen and understand. -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." (8(|) Homer Rules !!! |
|